DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Morphological Measurements of Anatomic Landmarks in Human Mandibular Molar Pulp Chambers - An in vivo Study

  • Lokade, Joyti (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Sharad Pawar Dental College, DMIMS) ;
  • Rawlani, Shivlal (Department of Oral Medicine & Radiology, Sharad Pawar Dental College, DMIMS) ;
  • Baheti, Rakhi (Chandak) (Department of Oral Medicine & Radiology, Sharad Pawar Dental College, DMIMS) ;
  • Roy, Shelly (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Sharad Pawar Dental College, DMIMS) ;
  • Chandak, Manoj (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Sharad Pawar Dental College, DMIMS) ;
  • Lohe, Vidya (Department of Oral Medicine & Radiology, Sharad Pawar Dental College, DMIMS)
  • 투고 : 2011.01.12
  • 심사 : 2011.04.14
  • 발행 : 2011.06.30

초록

Purpose: Exact knowledge of the location and dimension of the pulp chamber help to maintain the pulp healthy during operative procedure and also reduces the risk of perforation of pulp chamber during root canal treatment. This in-vivo study was carried out to measure critical morphology of pulp chamber of mandibular molar using intra-oral periapical radiograph. Materials and Methods: Mandibular molar teeth of 56 patients were evaluated. The mandibular molar teeth whose pulp chamber was not violated by caries, restoration, fracture crown and those having closed apex were included in the study. The intraoral periapical radiographs were taken with paralleling angle technique using radio-opaque grid with 1 mm space. This grid was placed directly on the film. Results: In 94% of the mandibular first molars specimens the pulp chamber ceiling was at the level of the cemento-enamel junction. The measurements showing the lowest percentage variance were buccal cusp to furcation (approximately 11%) and buccal cusp to pulp chamber ceiling (approximately 15%). The distance from the cusp tip to pulp chamber ceiling height was approximately 6.0 mm, the distance from the pulpal floor to the furcation was approximately 3.0 mm, and the average height of a pulp chamber was 1.5 to 2.0 mm. Conclusion: The exact knowledge of distances of pulp chamber from various anatomical landmarks helps in proper assessment of root canals and ultimately avoids the failure of root canal treatment.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bhaskar SN: Orban's oral histology and embryology, 11th ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1991: p.178.
  2. Aguirre R, elDeeb ME, elDeeb ME. Evaluation of the repair of mechanical furcation perforations using amalgam, gutta-percha, or indium foil. J Endod. 1986; 12: 249-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(86)80256-4
  3. Christie WH, Thompson GK. The importance of endodontic access in locating maxillary and mandibular molar canals. J Can Dent Assoc. 1994; 60: 527-32, 535-6.
  4. Alhadainy HA. Root perforations, a review of literature. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol. 1994; 78: 368-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(94)90070-1
  5. Goon WW, Lundergan WP. Redemption of a perforated furcation with a multidisciplinary treatment approach. J Endod. 1995; 21: 576-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80989-1
  6. Sterrett JD, Pelletier H, Russell CM. Tooth thickness at the furcation entrance of lower molars. J Clin Periodontol. 1996; 23: 621-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1996.tb00585.x
  7. Majzoub Z, Kon S. Tooth morphology following root resection procedures in maxillary first molars. J Periodontol. 1992; 63: 290-6. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1992.63.4.290
  8. Philippas GC. Influence of occlusal wear and age on formation of dentin and size of pulp chamber. J Dent Res. 1961; 40: 1186-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345610400061301
  9. Shaw L, Jones AD. Morphological considerations of the dental pulp chamber from radiographs of molar and premolar teeth. J Dent. 1984; 12: 139-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(84)90048-4
  10. Tidmarsh BG. Micromorphology of pulp chambers in human molar teeth. Int Endod J. 1980; 13: 69-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1980.tb00871.x
  11. Scotti R, Villa L, Carossa S. Clinical applicability of the radiographic method for determining the thickness of calcified crown tissues. J Prosthet Dent. 1991; 65: 65-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90050-7
  12. Deutsch AS,Musikant BL. Morphological measurement of anatomic landmarks in human maxillary and mandibular molar pulp chambers. J Endod. 2004; 30: 388-90. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200406000-00003
  13. Khojastepour L, Rahimizadeh N, Khayat A. Morphologic measurement of anatomic landmarks in pulp chambers of human first molar: a study of bitewing radiographs. Iranian Endod J. 2008; 1: 147-51.
  14. Velmurugan N, Venkateshbabu N, Abarajithan M, Kandaswamy D. Evaluation of the pulp chamber size of human maxillary first molars: an institution based in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2008; 19: 92-4. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.40459
  15. Tsesis I, Shifman A, Kaufman AY. Taurodontism, an endodontic challenge: report of a case. J Endod. 2003; 29: 353-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200305000-00009