한국산학기술학회논문지 (Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society)

  • 제12권8호
  • /
  • Pages.3532-3540
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 1975-4701(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-4688(eISSN)
한국산학기술학회 (The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

PTMSP/PDMS-PEI 복합막을 이용한 폐수중의 휘발성 유기화합물 제거에 관한 연구

Studies on the Removal of Volatile Organic Compounds in Wastewater using PTMSP/PDMS-PEI Composite Membrane by Pervaporation

  • 권창오 (김천대학교 임상병리학과) ;
  • 백귀찬 (상명대학교 자연과학대학 공업화학과) ;
  • 전경수 (경원대학교 자연과학대학 화학과)
  • Kweon, Chang-Oh (Dept. of Biomedical Laboratory Science, Gimcheon University) ;
  • Paik, Gwi-Chan (Dept. of Industrial Chemistry, College of Natural Science, Sangmyung University) ;
  • Chun, Kyung-Soo (Dept. of Chemistry, College of Natural Science, Kyungwon University)
  • 투고 : 2011.06.10
  • 심사 : 2011.08.11
  • 발행 : 2011.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Poly(1-trimethylsilyl-1-propyne)/poly(dimethylsiloxane)-polyetherimide (PTMSP/PDMS-PEI) 복합막을 상전환법과 dip coating에 의해 제조하여 PTMSP/PDMS 균질 치밀막의 투과유량을 향상시키고자 하였다. 균질 치밀막과 복합막을 이용하여 투과증발법에 의해 수중에 용해된 미량의 perchloroethylene(PCE), trichloroethylene (TCE), chloroform, 1,1,1-trichloroethane 등의 휘발성 유기화합물 제거 실험을 통해 투과증발 특성을 상호 비교하였다. PTMSP/PDMS 균질 치밀막의 선택도는 216.2에서 2394.4범위의 값을 나타냈으며 투과유량은 244.3g/$m^2.h$에서 428.2g/$m^2.h$ 사이였으며, PTMSP/PDMS-PEI 복합막의 선택도는 215.5에서 2404.2범위였고 투과유량은 390.4g/$m^2.h$에서 728.6g/$m^2.h$ 값을 보여 이 복합막의 투과특성을 균질 치밀막과 비교할 때 선택도에는 큰 차이가 없었으나 투과유량은 상당히 증대되었다. PTMSP/PDMS-PEI 복합막은 분리대상 용질 중 PCE의 분리에서 가장 우수한 투과특성을 나타냈으며 균질 치밀막보다 내구성과 기계적강도가 좋아 물속에 용해되어 있는 휘발성 유기화합물을 제거하는데 유용함을 알 수 있었다.

In order to improve flux of PTMSP/PDMS dense membrane, PTMSP/PDMS-PEI composite membrane with PEI support was prepared by phase inversion process and dip coating. These membranes were evaluated in terms of the removal of volatile organic compounds such as PCE, TCE, chloroform, 1,1,1-trichloroethane from wastewater by pervaporation. The selectivity and flux of PTMSP/PDMS dense membranes was in the range of 216.2 to 2394.4 and 244.3 to 428.2g/m2h, respectively. And pervaporation property of PTMSP/PDMS-PEI composite membrane was in the range of 215.5 to 2404.2 and 390.4 to 728.6g/m2h, respectively. PTMSP/PDMS-PEI composite membrane has remarkably greater flux than dense membranes with similar selectivity. It was possible for polymeric membranes used in this study to remove PCE selectively which is dissolved small quantity in water among other separable solutes. PTMSP/PDMS-PEI composite membrane showed the best performances among the silicone polymeric membranes, and has better durability and mechanical strength than dense membranes. PTMSP/PDMS-PEI composite membrane should be a useful candidate for the removal of volatile organic compounds dissolved in wastewater.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. R. E. Kesting, "Synthetic Polymeric Membrane", 479, John Wiley, 1985
  2. S. Borisov, V. S. Khotimsky, A. I. Revrov, et.al., J. Membrane Sci. 125, 319, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(96)00254-2
  3. K. C. T. Wright and D. R. Paul, J. Membrane Sci. 124, 161, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(96)00215-3
  4. C. Vauclair, H. Tarjus and P. Schaetzel, J. Membrane Sci. 125, 293, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(96)00233-5
  5. X. Feng and R. Y. M. Huang, J. Membrane Sci., 84, 15, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(93)85047-Z
  6. T. Masuda, E. Isobe and T. Higashimura, Macromolecules, 18, 841, 1985 https://doi.org/10.1021/ma00147a003
  7. T. Masuda, E. Isobe and T. Higashimura, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 105, 7473, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00363a061
  8. L. M. Robeson, and M. Langsam, Separation Science and Technology, 27, 1245, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1080/01496399208019423
  9. S. C. Pesek, and W. J. Koros, J. Membrane Sci., 88, 1, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(93)E0150-I
  10. H. Hachisuka, T. Ohara, and K. Ikeda, J. Membrane Sci., 116, 265, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(96)00048-8
  11. C. Barth, M. C. Goncalves, A. T. N. Pires, J. Roeder, and B. A. Wolf, J. Membrane Sci., 169, 287, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(99)00344-0
  12. J. F. M. Pennings, and B. Bosman, Colloid & Polymer Sci., 257, 720, 1979 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01474100
  13. A. W. Neumann, R. J. Good, C. J. Hope, and M. Sejpal, J. Colloid and Interface Sci., 49(2), 291, 1974 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(74)90365-8
  14. Y. Nagase, K. Ishihara, and K. Matsui, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Phys. Ed., 28, 377, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.1990.090280309
  15. Y. M. Lee, D. Bourgeois, and G. Belfort, J. Membrane Sci., 44(2), 161, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(00)83350-5
  16. J. P. Brun, C. Larchet, G. Bulvestre, and B. Auclair, J. Membrane Sci., 25, 55 , 1985 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(00)83003-3
  17. 大矢晴彦, 佐藤亨久, 松本幹治, 原 達也, 根岸洋一: 水道協會雜誌, 59(8), 2 (1990).
  18. B. K. Oh, S. Y. Ha, S. T. Ha, and Y. M. Lee, Membrane J., 4(1), 57 (1994).
  19. P. J. Hickey, F. P. Juricic, and C. S. Slater, Separation Science and Technology, 27(7), 843, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1080/01496399208019729