Journal of the Korean Society for Railway (한국철도학회논문집)

The Korean Society for Railway (한국철도학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study on a 2-Dimensional Dynamic Modeling Technique to Analyze the Overriding Phenomena of Rollingstock

열차의 타고오름 해석을 위한 2차원 충돌동역학 모델링 기법 연구

  • 김거영 (서울과학기술대학교 철도전문대학원) ;
  • 구정서 (서울과학기술대학교 철도전문대학원) ;
  • 권태수 (한국철도기술연구원)
  • Received : 2010.11.16
  • Accepted : 2011.01.12
  • Published : 2011.02.26
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper proposed a new 2-D multi-body dynamic modeling technique to analyze overriding behaviors taking place during train collision. This dynamic model is composed of nonlinear springs, dampers and masses by considering the deformable characteristics of carbodies as well as energy absorbing structures and components. By solving this dynamic model for rollingstock, energy absorbing capacities of collision elements, accelerations of passenger sections, impact forces applied to interconnecting devices, and overriding displacements can be well estimated. For a case study, we chose KHST (Korean High Speed Train), obtained crush characteristic data of each carbody section from 3-D finite element analysis, and established a 2-D multi-body dynamic model. This 2-D dynamic model was simulated under the train-to-train collision scenarios, and evaluated with 3-D virtual testing model. It was founded from the simulation results that this 2-D dynamic model could well predict overriding behaviors, and the modeling technique of carbody deformation was very important in overriding estimation.

본 논문은 열차의 타고오름 해석을 위한 새로운 2차원 다물체 동역학 모델링 방법을 제안하였다. 본 동역학 모델은 에너지 흡수구조/부품뿐만 아니라 차체의 변형도 고려하여 비선형 스프링, 댐퍼, 질량으로 구성되며 철도차량의 충돌에너지흡수량, 승객구간의 가속도, 연결 장치의 충격력, 차량간 타고오름 변위 등을 잘 예측할 수 있다. 제안된 방법으로 한국형고속열차를 차체 각 부분의 압괴 특성을 구하고 2차원 다물체 충돌동역학 모델을 구성하였다. 열차 대 열차 충돌 시나리오조건으로 2차원 동역학 모델을 시뮬레이션하고 3차원 가상시험 모델로 평가하였다. 그 결과 2차원 동역학 모델은 타고오름 거동을 잘 예측하였으며 차체변형을 고려한 모델링 기법이 타고오름 평가에 중요함을 확인하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. J.P. Dias, M.S. Pereira (2004) Optimization methods for crash-worthiness design using multibody models, Computers and Structures, 82, pp. 1371-1380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.03.032
  2. K. Jacobsen, D. Tyrell, B. Perlman (2004) Impact tests of crash energy management passenger rail cars: Analysis and structural measurements, ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress, November 13-19.
  3. J.F. Milho, J.A.C. Ambrosio, M.F.O.S. Pereira, I.J. Crash (2003) Validated multibody model for train crash analysis, 8(4), pp. 339-352. https://doi.org/10.1533/ijcr.2003.0242
  4. K.J. Severson, D.C. Tyrell, A.B. Perlman (2003) Collision safety comparison of conventional and crash energy management passenger rail car designs, ASME/IEEE Joint Railroad Conference, April 22-24.
  5. D. Tyrell, K. Jacobsen, D. Parent, A.B. Perlman (2005) Preparations for a Train-to-Train Impact Test of Crash-Energy Management Passenger Rail Equipment, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp. IMECE2005-70045.
  6. D. Tyrell, K. Severson, A.B. Perlman, R. Rancatore (2002) Train-to-Train Impact Tests: Analysis of Structural Measurements, Proceedings of IMECE, the 2002 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress, and Exposition, November 17-22, New Orleans, Louisiana
  7. National Transportation Safety Board (2003) Head-On Collision Between BNSF and Metrolink Trains, and Subsequent Derailment, in Placentia, California on April 23, 2002: Factual Report, Survival Factors Issues. DCA-02-MR-004, 2/20/2003
  8. National Transportation Safety Board (2002) Collision of Burlington Northern Santa Fe Freight Train with Metrolink Passenger Train Placentia, California, Railroad Accident Report NTSB/RAR-03/04. Washington, DC. April 23.
  9. H.S. Han and J.S. Koo (2003) Simulation of train crashes, Vehicle System Dynamics, 40(6), pp. 435-450. https://doi.org/10.1076/vesd.40.6.435.17906
  10. Jorge Ambrosio (2005) Crash analysis and dynamical behavior of light road and rail vehicles, Vehicle System Dynamics, 43(6), pp. 385-411. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423110500151788
  11. C. Oyan (1998) Dynamic simulation of Taipei EMU train, Vehicle System Dynamics, 30, pp. 143-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423119808969441
  12. Brite/Euram III (2001) Train Crashworthiness for Europe:BE-3092, SAFETRAIN Final Report, 10/30/2001
  13. G.Y. Kim, H.J. Cho, J.S. Koo(2008) A Study on Conceptual Design for Crashworthiness of the Next Generation High-speed EMU, Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, 11(3), pp. 300-310.
  14. J.S. Koo, S.H. Park, Y.H. Youn, D.S. Kim (1999) Crashworthiness on the full rake of KHST, Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, Autumn Conference, Korea, pp. 526-533.
  15. D. Tyrell, E. Martinez, K. Jacobsen (2007) Passenger Cab Car Grade Crossing Impact Test Report, U. S. Department of Transportation, DOT/FRA/ORD-07/24.I, October

Cited by

  1. Study on Computational Simulation of a Metro Collision Accident and Improvement of Passive Safety vol.39, pp.9, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3795/KSME-A.2015.39.9.885
  2. Study on 3-D Simulation for Overriding Evaluation of Urban Train vol.39, pp.10, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3795/KSME-A.2015.39.10.1063
  3. A Study on Prediction of Overriding Behavior Leading Vehicle in Train Collision vol.40, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3795/KSME-A.2016.40.8.711