DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Keratinase on Performance, Nutrient Utilization, Intestinal Morphology, Intestinal Ecology and Inflammatory Response of Weaned Piglets Fed Diets with Different Levels of Crude Protein

  • Wang, D. (Ministry of Agriculture Feed Industry Centre, State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Piao, X.S. (Ministry of Agriculture Feed Industry Centre, State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Zeng, Z.K. (Ministry of Agriculture Feed Industry Centre, State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Lu, T. (Ministry of Agriculture Feed Industry Centre, State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Zhang, Q. (Ministry of Agriculture Feed Industry Centre, State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Li, P.F. (Ministry of Agriculture Feed Industry Centre, State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Xue, L.F. (Ministry of Agriculture Feed Industry Centre, State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Kim, S.W. (Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University)
  • 투고 : 2011.05.06
  • 심사 : 2011.06.10
  • 발행 : 2011.12.01

초록

Two experiments were conducted to investigate the in vitro ability of keratinase to hydrolyze soybean glycinin and ${\beta}$-conglycinin and to evaluate the in vivo effects of keratinase when included in corn-soybean diets with different levels of crude protein and fed to nursery pigs. In experiment 1, a saturated keratinase solution (1 ml) was added to two blank controls of either glycinin or ${\beta}$-conglycinin resulting in the hydrolysis of 94.74% glycinin and 88.89% ${\beta}$-conglycinin. In experiment 2, 190 pigs (8.3${\pm}$0.63 kg BW) were allotted to one of four treatments in a 2${\times}$2 factorial arrangement on the basis of body weight, and sex was balanced among the pens. The effects of crude protein (19 vs. 22%) and keratinase (0 vs. 0.05%) were studied. Each treatment was applied to six pens with seven (two pens) or eight pigs per pen. Pigs were fed the experimental diets for 21 d. Weight gain and feed conversion ratio were improved (p<0.05) with keratinase supplementation while feed intake was reduced (p<0.05). Keratinase supplementation increased (p<0.05) the apparent total tract digestibility of dry matter, energy, crude protein and phosphorus. Keratinase supplementation also increased n-butyric acid in the cecum and colon, lactobacilli and total anaerobe counts in the colon as well as the ratio of villus height to crypt depth in the ileum. Additionally, fecal score, ammonia nitrogen and branch chain volatile fatty acids in the colon, E. coli and total aerobe counts in the colon, crypt depth in the jejunum and ileum as well as serum interleukin-1 and interleukin-6 concentrations were also decreased (p<0.05) by keratinase supplementation. A reduction in dietary crude protein decreased (p<0.05) colon ammonia nitrogen concentration and cecal propionic acid and branch chain volatile fatty acid concentrations. In addition, cecal E. coli counts, colon total anaerobe counts, ileal crypt depth, and serum interleukin-1 and interleukin-6 concentrations were also decreased (p<0.05) with the reduction of dietary crude protein. With the exception of fecal scores, there were no significant interactions between crude protein and keratinase. This study provides evidence that dietary keratinase supplementation improved nursery pig performance by improving intestinal morphology and ecology, thus improving nutrient digestibility and alleviating the inflammatory response.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. AOAC. 2000. Official methods of analysis, 17th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA.
  2. Bockle, B., B. Galunsky and R. Muller. 1995. Characterization of a keratinolytic serine proteinase from Streptomyces pactum DSM 40530. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:3705-3710.
  3. Brandom, D. L. and M. Friedman. 2002. Immunoassays of soy proteins. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50:6635-6642. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf020186g
  4. Braude, R., R. J. Fulford and A. G. Low. 1976. Studies on digestion and absorption in the intestines of growing pigs. Br. J. Nutr. 36:497-510. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19760104
  5. Fan, M. Z. and W. C. Sauer. 2002. Determination of true ileal amino acid digestibility and the endogenous amino acid outputs associated with barley samples for growing-finishing pigs by the regression analysis technique. J. Anim. Sci. 80:1593-1605.
  6. Gaskins, H. R. 2000. Intestinal bacteria and their influence on swine growth. In: Swine Nutrition (Ed. A. J. Lewis and L. L. Southern). CRC Press, New York, pp. 585-608.
  7. Golubovic, M., S. H. van Hateren, M. Ottens, G. J. Witkamp and L. A. M. van der Wielen. 2005. Novel method for the production of pure glycinin from soybeans. J. Agric. Food Chem. 53:5265-5269. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0478206
  8. Gradisar, H., S. Kern and J. Friedrich. 2000. Keratinase of Doratomyces microspores. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 53:196-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530050008
  9. Gradisar, H., J. Friedrich, I. Krizaj and R. Jerala. 2005. Similarities and specificities of fungal keratinolytic proteases: Comparison of keratinases of Paecilomyces marquandii and Doratomyces microsporus to some known proteases. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 71:3420-3426.
  10. Gupta, R. and P. Ramnani. 2006. Microbial keratinases and their prospective applications: An overview. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 70:21-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-005-0239-8
  11. Hou, D. H. and S. K. C. Chang. 2004. Structural characteristics of purified glycinin from soybeans stored under various conditions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 52:3792-3800. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf035072z
  12. Htoo, J. K., B. A. Araiza, W. C. Sauer, M. Rademacher, Y. Zhang, M. Cervantes and R. T. Zijlstra. 2007. Effect of dietary protein content on ileal amino acid digestibility, growth performance, and formation of microbial metabolites in ileal and cecal digesta of early-weaned pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 85:3303-3312. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0105
  13. Kim, W. K. and P. H. Patterson. 2000. Nutritional value of enzyme or sodium hydroxide treated feathers from dead hens. Poult. Sci. 79:528-534. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.4.528
  14. Kong, X. F., Y. L. Yin, Q. H. He, F. G. Yin, H. J. Liu, T. J. Li, R. L. Huang, M. M. Geng, Z. Ruan, Z. Y. Deng, M. Y. Xie and G. Wu. 2009. Dietary supplementation with Chinese herbal powder enhances ileal digestibilities and serum concentrations of amino acids in young pigs. Amino Acids 37:573-582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-008-0176-9
  15. Le Bellego, L. and J. Noblet. 2002. Performance and utilization of dietary energy and amino acids in piglets fed low protein diets. Livest. Prod. Sci. 76:45-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00008-8
  16. Le, P. D., A. J. A. Aarnink, A. W. Jongbloed, C. M. C. van der Peet-Schwering, N. W. M. Ogink and M. W. A. Verstegen. 2007. Interactive effects of dietary crude protein and fermentable carbohydrate levels on odour from pig manure. Livest. Sci. 114:48-61.
  17. Li, D. F., J. L. Nelssen, P. G. Reddy, F. Blecha, R. D. Klemm, D. W. Giesting, J. D. Hancock, G. L. Allee and R. D. Goodband. 1991. Measuring suitability of soybean products for early-weaned pigs with immunological criteria. J. Anim. Sci. 69:3299-3307.
  18. Li, P. F., X. S. Piao, Z. K. Zeng, D. Wang, L. F. Xue, R. F. Zhang, B. Dong and S. W. Kim. 2011. Effects of the standard ileal digestible lysine to metabolizable energy ratio on performance, nutrient digestibility, and plasma parameters of 10 to 28 kg pigs. J. Anim. Sci. Biotech. 2:35-43.
  19. Lin, X., J. C. H. Shih and H. E. Swaisgood. 1996. Hydrolysis of feather keratin by immobilized keratinase. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:4273-4275.
  20. McDonnell, P., C. O'Shea, S. Figat and J. V. O'Doherty. 2010. Influence of incrementally substituting dietary soya bean meal for rapeseed meal on nutrient digestibility, nitrogen excretion, growth performance and ammonia emissions from growing-finishing pigs. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 64:412-424. https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2010.496947
  21. Montagne, L., J. R. Pluske and D. J. Hampson. 2003. A review of interactions between dietary fibre and the intestinal mucosa, and their consequences on digestive health in young non-ruminant animals. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 108:95-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(03)00163-9
  22. NRC. 1998. Nutrient requirements of swine 10th rev. ed. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC, USA.
  23. Nyachoti, C. M., F. O. Omogbenigun, M. Rademacher and G. Blank. 2006. Performance responses and indicators of gastrointestinal health in early-weaned pigs fed low-protein amino acid-supplemented diets. J. Anim. Sci. 84:125-134.
  24. Odetallah, N. H., J. J. Wang, J. D. Garlich and J. C. H. Shih. 2003. Ketatinase in starter diets improves growth of broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 82:664-670. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.4.664
  25. Odetallah, N. H., J. J. Wang, J. D. Garlich and J. C. H. Shih. 2005. Versazyme supplementation of broiler diets improves market growth performance. Poult. Sci. 84:858-864. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.6.858
  26. Panda, A. K., S. V. Rama Rao, M. V. L. N. Raju and G. Shyam Sunder. 2009. Effect of butyric acid on performance, gastrointestinal tract health and carcass characteristics in broiler chickens. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 22:1026-1031. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2009.80298
  27. Pierce, K. M., J. J. Callan, P. McCarthy and J. V. O'Doherty. 2005. Performance of weanling pigs offered low or high lactose diets supplemented with avilamycin or inulin. Anim. Sci. 80:313-318.
  28. Qiao, S. Y., D. F. Li, J. Y. Jiang, H. J. Zhou, J. S. Li and P. A. Thacker. 2003. Effect of moist extruded full-fat soybeans on gut morphology and mucosal cell turnover rate (Time) of weanling pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 16:63-69. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2003.63
  29. Shen, Y. B., X. S. Piao, S. W. Kim, L. Wang, P. Liu, I. Yoon and Y. G. Zhen. 2009. Effects of yeast culture supplementation on growth performance, intestinal health, and immune response of nursery pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 87:2614-2624. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1512
  30. Spurlock, M. E. 1997. Regulation of metabolism and growth during immune challenge: An overview of cytokine function. J. Anim. Sci. 75:1773-1783.
  31. Sun, P., D. F. Li, Z. J. Li, B. Dong and F. L. Wang. 2007. Effects of glycinin on IgE-mediated increase of mast cell numbers and histamine release in the small intestine. J. Nutr. Biochem. 19:627-633.
  32. Swick, R. A. 2007. Selecting soy protein for animal feed. 15th Annual ASAIM Southeast Asian Feed Technology and Nutrition Workshop, Bali, Indonesia.
  33. Tu, G. Q., Y. J. Ye, B. Zhang, M. J. Guo and Y. H. Sun. 1998. Studies on the biomechanism of keratin decomposed by streptomyces. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis 20:1-5.
  34. Wang, H. Y. 2007. Effects of enzyme supplementation on broiler chicks fed different type diets and the underlying mechanism. Ph.D. Thesis, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
  35. Wang, H. Y., Y. M. Guo and J. C. H. Shih. 2008. Effects of dietary supplementation of keratinase on growth performance, nitrogen retention and intestinal morphology of broiler chickens fed diets with soybean and cottonseed meals. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 140:376-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.04.003
  36. Wang, J. J. and J. Shih. 1999. Fermentation production of keratinase from Bacillus licheniformis PWD-l and a recombinant B. subtillis FDB-29. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biothnol. 22:608-616. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jim.2900667
  37. Wang, J. J., J. D. Garlich and J. C. H. Shih. 2006. Beneficial effects of versazyme, a keratinase feed additive, on body weight, feed conversion, and breast yield of broiler chickens. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 15:544-550. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/15.4.544
  38. Williams, C. H., D. J. David and O. Iismaa. 1962. The determination of chromic oxide in faeces sample by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. J. Agric. Sci. 59:381-385. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185960001546X
  39. Yi, G. F., A. M. Gaines, B. W. Ratliff, P. Srichana, G. L. Allee, K. R. Perryman and C. D. Knight. 2006. Estimation of the true ileal digestible lysine and sulfur amino acid requirement and comparison of the bioefficacy of 2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio) butanoic acid and DL-methionine in eleven to twenty six-kilogram nursery pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 84:1709-1721. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2005-465
  40. Yoo, J. S., H. D. Jang, J. H. Lee and I. H. Kim. 2009. Effect of fermented soy bean protein on nitrogen balance and apparent fecal and ileal digestibility in weaned pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 22:1167-1173. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2009.80274
  41. Yu, R. J., J. Ragot and F. Blank. 1972. Keratinases: Hydrolysis of keratinous substrates by three enzymes of Trichophyton mentagrophytes. Experimentia 28:1512-1513. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01957886

피인용 문헌

  1. Effects of essential oil supplementation of a low-energy diet on performance, intestinal morphology and microflora, immune properties and antioxidant activities in weaned pigs vol.86, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12277
  2. Effects of Coated Compound Proteases on Apparent Total Tract Digestibility of Nutrients and Apparent Ileal Digestibility of Amino Acids for Pigs vol.29, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.16.0041
  3. Performance Responses, Nutrient Digestibility, Blood Characteristics, and Measures of Gastrointestinal Health in Weanling Pigs Fed Protease Enzyme vol.29, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0886
  4. Interactive effects of dietary protein concentration, a mono-component exogenous protease and ascorbic acid on broiler performance, nutritional status and gut health vol.57, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15740
  5. Effects of dietary supplementation with a protease on the apparent ileal digestibility of the weaned piglet vol.90, pp.suppl_4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.53835
  6. Effects of dietary supplementation of multi-enzyme on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, small intestinal digestive enzyme activities, and large intestinal selected microbiota in weanling pigs1 vol.92, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-6672
  7. Influence of a cocktail of protease and xylanase in different energy densities of corn- and soybean-meal-based diet on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, carcass quality, and gas emission in broilers vol.98, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2017-0091
  8. Meeting Global Feed Protein Demand: Challenge, Opportunity, and Strategy vol.7, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-030117-014838
  9. Effects of dietary supplementation with Bacillus licheniformis derived-protease on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and fecal microbial shedding in post-weaned growing pigs vol.47, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2019.1626240
  10. The Effects of Partially or Completely Substituted Dietary Zinc Sulfate by Lower Levels of Zinc Methionine on Growth Performance, Apparent Total Tract Digestibility, Immune Function, and Visceral Indi vol.9, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9050236
  11. Effects of protease supplementation on growth performance, blood constituents, and carcass characteristics of growing-finishing pigs vol.61, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2019.61.4.234
  12. Effects of dietary mixture of protease and probiotics on growth performance, blood constituents, and carcass characteristics of growing-finishing pigs vol.61, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2019.61.5.272
  13. Dietary supplementation of xylanase and protease on growth performance, digesta viscosity, nutrient digestibility, immune and oxidative stress status, and gut health of newly weaned pigs vol.5, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2019.04.005
  14. Effect of supplemental serine-protease from Bacillus licheniformis on growth performance and physiological change of broiler chickens vol.48, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2020.1732986
  15. Effects of different levels of crude protein and protease on nitrogen utilization, nutrient digestibility, and growth performance in growing pigs vol.62, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2020.62.5.659
  16. Effect of Folic Acid Supplementation and Dietary Protein Level on Growth Performance, Serum Chemistry and Immune Response in Weanling Piglets Fed Differing Concentrations of Aflatoxin vol.12, pp.10, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12100651
  17. Effects of maternal 25-hydroxycholecalciferol during the last week of gestation and lactation on serum parameters, intestinal morphology and microbiota in suckling piglets vol.74, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039x.2020.1822710
  18. Intestinal Health of Pigs Upon Weaning: Challenges and Nutritional Intervention vol.8, pp.None, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.628258
  19. Comparative Effects of Compound Enzyme and Antibiotics on Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, Blood Biochemical Index, and Intestinal Health in Weaned Pigs vol.12, pp.None, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.768767
  20. Effects of feeding corn distillers dried grains with solubles diets without or with supplemental enzymes on growth performance of pigs: a meta-analysis vol.5, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab029
  21. Oral Vaccination against Lawsoniaintracellularis Changes the Intestinal Microbiome in Weaned Piglets vol.11, pp.7, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11072082