DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of dietary inuloprebuotics on thiobarbituric acid reactive substances of chicken meat

닭고기의 지방산패도에 미치는 이눌로프리바이오틱스 급여효과

  • Park, Byung-Sung (Department of Animal Biotechnology, College of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University)
  • 박병성 (강원대학교 동물생명과학대학 동물생명공학과)
  • Received : 2011.04.06
  • Accepted : 2011.04.23
  • Published : 2011.06.30

Abstract

The author previously reported that the addition of inuloprebiotics to broiler diets produces growth performance that is superior to antibiotic supplementation. The present study furthered this work by evaluating the quality with thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) of the meat from chickens fed inuloprebiotics produced using Korean Jerusalem artichoke. Male Ross 308 broilers (n=240) were randomly allotted to a 35 day regimen of dietary control (no supplementation), dietary antibiotics supplementation (8 mg avilamycin/kg diet), or dietary inuloprebiotic supplementation (450 mg inuloprebiotics/kg diet). The pH, water holding capacity, L*value (lightness), and b*value (yellowness) of the chicken meat weres ignificantly higher in the inuloprebiotic group. The TBARS value of chicken meat stored at low temperature tended to increase according to the length of storage, and was significantly lower in the inuloprebiotics group. The sensory scores of the cooked chicken meat were significantly higher in the inuloprebiotics group. The results indicate that the addition of inuloprebiotics as anantimicrobial agent to broiler diets can greatly improve the quality and self-life with reducing TBARS of chicken meat.

Keywords

References

  1. J. J. Dibner and J. D. Richards, Antibiotic growth promoters in agriculture: History and mode of action, Poult. Sci., 84, 634(2005). https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.4.634
  2. M. B. Roberfroid, J. A. E. van Loo, and G. R. Gibson, The bifidogenic nature of chicory inulin and its hydrolysis products, J. Nutr., 128, 11(1998). https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/128.1.11
  3. G. R. Gibson and R. A. Rastall, Prebiotics: Development and application, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., USA (2006).
  4. J. A. Patterson and K. M. Burkholder, Application of prebiotics in poultry production, Poult.Sci.,82,627(2003). https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.4.627
  5. V. D. Rada, M. Duskova, and J. Petr, Enrichment of Bifidobacteria in the hen caeca by dietary inulin, Folia Microbiol., 46, 73(2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02825891
  6. Z. R. Xu, C. H. Hu, and M. O. Wang, Effects of fructooligosaccharide on conversion of L-tryptophan to skatole and indole by mixed populations of pig fecal bacteria, J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol., 48, 83(2002). https://doi.org/10.2323/jgam.48.83
  7. W. F. Zhang, D. F. Li, W. Q. Lu, and G. F. Yi, Effects of isomalto-oilgosaccharides on broiler performance and intestinal microflora, Poult. Sci., 82, 657(2003). https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.4.657
  8. F. Hernandez, J. Madrid, V. Garcia, J. Orengo, and M. D. Megias, Influence of two plant extracts on broilers performance, digestibility, and digestive organ size, Poult. Sci., 83, 169(2004). https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.2.169
  9. L. M. Dorotea and D. N. M. Maris, Molecular properties and prebiotic effect of inulin obtained from artichoke(Cynara scolymus L.), Phytochemistry., 66, 1476(2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2005.04.003
  10. B. S. Park, Bifidogenic effects of inuloprebiotics in broiler chickens, J. Life. Sci., 18, 1693 (2008). https://doi.org/10.5352/JLS.2008.18.12.1693
  11. Effects of inulin and enzyme complex, individually or in combination, on growth performance, intestinal microflora, cecal fermentation characteristics, and jejunal histomorphology in broiler chickens fed a wheat- and barley-based diet, Poult. Sci., 89, 276(2010). https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00336
  12. H. Rehman, P. Hellweg, D. Taras, and J. Zentek, Effects of dietary inulin on the intestinal short chain fatty acids and microbial ecology in broiler chickens as revealed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, Poult. Sci., 87, 783(2008). https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00271
  13. P. Holownia, B. Jaworska-Luczak, and I. Wisniewska, The benefits and potential health hazards posed by the prebiotic inulin-a review, Polish J. Food Nutr. Sci., 60, 201(2010).
  14. R. Jianming, L. Jingli, F. Dong, and G. Zhanyong, Highly efficient synthesis and antioxidant activity of O-(aminoethyl) inulin, Carbohydrate Polymers., 83, 1240 (2010).
  15. T. Mitsuoka, Bifidobacteria and their role in human health, J. Induct. Micro., 6, 263(1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01575871
  16. H. W. Modler, R. C. McKellar, and M. Yaguchi, Bifidobacteria and bifidogenic factors-review, Can. Inst. Food Sci. Technol. J. .23, 29(1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0315-5463(90)70197-6
  17. B. S. Park and D. H. Son, Feed composition for replacing antibiotic comprising inulin originated from jerusalem artichoke. WIPO Patent Application WO/2008/075878 (2008).
  18. S.O. Park and B. S. Park, Effect of dietary inuloprebiotics on performance, serum immunoglobulin and caecal microflora in broiler chickens, Kor. J. Organic Agric., 17, 539(2009).
  19. A. D. French, Chemical and physical properties of fructans, Plant Physiol., 134, 125(1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(89)80044-6
  20. Scot PIL training manual, Glasgow Univ. UK (1994).
  21. National Research Council, Nutrients requirements of poultry. 9th rev. National Academy Press, Washington DC. USA (1994).
  22. B. Close, K. Banister, V. Baumans, E. M. Bernoth, N. Bromage, J. Bunyan, W. Erhardt, P. Flecknell, N. Gregory, H. Hackbarth, D. Morton, and C. Warwick, Recommendations for euthanasia of experimental animals, Part 2. Laboratory animals., 31,1-32(1997).
  23. C. Berri, J. Besnard, and C. Relandeau, Increasing dietary lysine increases final pH and decreases drip loss of broiler breast meat, Poult. Sci., 87, 480(2008). https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00226
  24. K. O. Honikel, Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat, Meat Sci., 49, 447(1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00034-5
  25. CIE, Iternational Commission on Illumination, Recommendations on uniform colour spaces, colour difference equations, psychometric colour terms. CIE Publication(15E-1.31) 1971/TO-1.3) Suppl. 15. Bureau Central de la CIE, Paris (1978).
  26. J. A. Burge and J. D. Aust, Microsomal lipid peroxidation, Methods Enzymol., 52, 302(1978).
  27. SAS, Statistical Analysis System, InstituteInc. JMP. Statistical Discovery. V.6.0(2005).
  28. R. L. Van Laack, J. M. C. H Liu, M. O. Smith, and H. D. Loveday, Characteristics of pale, soft, exudative broiler breast meat, Poult.Sci., 79, 1057 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.7.1057
  29. O. A. Young, J. West, A. L. Hart, and F. F. H. Van Otterdijk, A method for early determination of meat ultimate pH, MeatSci., 66, 493 (2004).
  30. E. J. Briskey and W. Pedersen, Biochemistry of pork muscle structure, I. Rate of anaerobic glycolysis and temperature change versus the apparent structure of muscle tissue, J. Food Sci., 26, 296 (1961).
  31. J. F. Young, J. Stasted, S. K. Jensen, A. H. Karlsson, and P. Henckel, Ascorbic acid, ${\alpha}-tocopherol$, and oregano supplements reduce stress-induced deterioration of chicken meat quality, Poult. Sci., 82, 1343(2003). https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.8.1343
  32. P. M. Nissen, and J. F. Young, Creatine monohydrate and glucose supplementation to slow- and fast-growing chickens changes the postmortem pH in pectoralis major, Poult. Sci., 85, 1038 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.6.1038
  33. G. Tian, and B. Yu, Recent advances in flavour of chicken quality, Chin. Sichuan Anim. Sci, Vet. Med., 28, 54 (2001).
  34. S. Barbut, Problem of pale soft exudative meat in broiler chickens, Br. Poult. Sci., 75, 505(1997).
  35. S. Raharjo and J. N. Sofos, Methodology of measuring malonylaldehyde as a product of lipid peroxidation in muscle tissues: a review, MeatSci., 35, 145 (1993).
  36. J. A. Dickens, M. E. Berrang, and N. A. Cox, Efficacy of an herbal extract on the microbiological quality of broiler carcass during a simulated chill, Poult. Sci., 79, 1200 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.8.1200