KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research (대한토목학회논문집)

Korean Society of Civil Engeneers (대한토목학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Ground-Structure Seismic Interaction-Induced Rocking Behavior and the Uplift Behavior of Underground Hollow Structure

지반-구조물 동적 상호작용에 의한 Rocking현상과 그에 따른 지하 중공구조물의 부상거동

  • Kang, Gi-Chun (Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology)
  • Received : 2011.07.27
  • Accepted : 2012.04.26
  • Published : 2012.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper described a centrifuge study in order to investigate ground-underground hollow structure interaction-induced rocking behavior in liquefied ground. Uplift of the underground hollow structures is initiated due to liquefaction in sandy grounds when the ground is exposed to a strong shaking during earthquakes because the apparent unit weight of these structures is smaller than that of the liquefied soil. In order to evaluate the dynamic behavior of the underground hollow structure and the effects of original subsoil during the uplifting, model tests were performed by changing the relative density of the original subsoil and installing an acrylic box as a trench. The results of the present study show that rocking behavior of the underground hollow structure due to shear deformation of the surrounding subsoil or lateral movement from the original subsoil contributed to large magnitude of the uplift due to strong shaking.

본 논문은 액상화 지반에서의 지반-지하 중공구조물 상호작용에 따른 구조물의 rocking현상을 조사하기 위해서 수행한 원심모형실험에 관하여 서술하고 있다. 지진이 발생하였을 때 지반이 강한 진동에 노출되면 상대밀도가 낮은 느슨한 모래지반에서는 액상화가 발생하며, 액상화된 지반보다 작은 단위중량을 가진 지하 중공구조물은 부상한다. 지하 중공구조물이 부상하는 동안에 구조물의 동적 거동과 구조물의 부상량에 대한 원지반의 영향을 평가하기 위하여 원지반의 상대밀도를 다르게 모델지반을 제작하였고, 아크릴 박스를 이용하여 트랜치를 제작하여 모형실험을 수행하였다. 실험결과, 액상화된 원지반의 측방유동 및 주변지반의 전단변형에 의해 야기되는 지하 중공구조물의 rocking현상이 지하 중공구조물의 부상량의 규모에 크게 기여하는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. 강기천(2011) 지진발생시 과잉간극수압비의 증가에 따른 지중 지하구조물의 거동, 한국지반공학회논문집, 한국지반공학회, 제27호 제12호, pp. 27-37.
  2. ASCE (1974) Earthquake damage evaluation and design considerations for underground structures, February, American Society of Civil Engineers, Los Angeles Section.
  3. Cheuk, C. Y., White, D. J., and Bolton, M. D. (2008) Uplift mechanisms of pipes buried in sand, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 134, No. 2, pp. 154-163. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:2(154)
  4. Chin, E. L., Craig, W. H., and Cruickshank, M. (2006) Uplift resistance of pipelines buried in cohesionless soil, Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics. Ng, Zhang, and Wang, eds., Vol. 1, Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp. 723-728.
  5. Dewoolkar, M.M., Ko, H.-Y., Stadler, A.T . and Astaneh, S. M. F. (1999) A substitute pore fluid for seismic centrifuge modeling, Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 196-210. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11111J
  6. Dowding, C. H. and Rozen, A. (1978) Damage to rock tunnels from earthquake shaking, Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, Vol. 104, GT2, pp. 175-191.
  7. Iai, S., Tobita, T., and Imai, J. (2005) Centrifuge model tests of uplift behavior of manhole in liquefiable deposit, Proc. 28th JSCE Earthquake Engineering Symposium, JSCE, Tokyo, Japan, paper No.04.
  8. Kiku, H., Fukunaga, R., Kimura, M., Takahashi, M. and Matsumoto, M. (2007) Shaking table test on mechanism of uplift of manhole due to liquefaction, The 42nd Japan National Conference on Geotechnical Engineering, JGS, Nagoya, Japan, pp. 1887-1888.
  9. Konishi, Y., Tobita, T., Takahashi, K., and Takeuchi, M. (2008) Estimation of uplift displacement and evaluation of countermeasure against uplift of a sewage manhole, Journal of Japan Sewage Works Association, Vol. 45, No. 553, pp. 99-111
  10. Koseki, J., Matsuo, O., Ninomiya, Y., and Yoshida, T. (1997) Uplift of sewer manhole during the 1993 Kushiro-Oki earthquake, Soils and Foundations, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 109-121. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.37.109
  11. Koseki, J., Matsuo, O., and Shuji, T. (1998) Uplift of sewer pipes caused by earthquake-induced liquefaction of surrounding soil, Soils and Foundations, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 75-87. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.38.3_75
  12. Ling, H.I., Mohri, Y.,Kawabata, T., Liu, H., Burke, C., and Sun, L. (2003) Centrifugal modeling of seismic behavior of largediameter pipe in liquefiable soil, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 129, No. 12, pp. 1092-1101. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:12(1092)
  13. Matsushima, O., Meguro, R., Matsuda, K., Nakata, U., and Matsuo, M. (2007) Research on Countermeasures to Prevent Uplift of Sewage Manholes (WIDE Safety Pipe method), Annuals of Japan Institute of Wastewater Engineering Technology.
  14. Ng, C. W. W. and Springman, S. M. (1994) Uplift resistance of buried pipelines in granular materials, Centrifuge 94, Leung, Lee, and Tan, eds., pp. 753-758.
  15. Orense, R. P., Morimoto, I., Yamamoto, Y., Yumiyama, T., Yamamoto, H., and Sugawara K. (2003) Study on wall-type gravel drains as liquefaction countermeasure for underground structures, Soil Dynamic and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 19-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00152-5
  16. Owen, G. N. and Scholl, R. E. (1981) Earthquake engineering of large underground structures, Federal Highway Administration and National Science Foundation, Report no. FHWA/RD-80/195
  17. Sharma, S. and Judd, W. R. (1991) Underground opening damage from earthquakes, Engineering Geology, Vol. 30, pp. 263-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(91)90063-Q
  18. Shin-Etsu Chemical Co. (1997) Metolose Brochure, Cellulose Dept., 6-1, Ohtemachi 2-chome, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
  19. Stevens, P. R. (1977) A review of the effects of earthquakes on underground mines, United States Geological Survey Open File Report, US Energy Research and Development Administration, Reston, pp. 77-313.
  20. Venden Berghe, J. F., Cathie, D., and Ballard, J. C. (2005) Pipeline uplift mechanisms using finite element analysis, Proc., 16th Int. Conf. of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Osaka, Japan, pp. 1801-1804.
  21. Wang, L. R. L., Shim, J. S., Ishibashi, I. and Wang, Y. (1990) Dynamic responses of buried pipelines during a liquefaction process, Soil Dynamic and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 44-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(09)90009-4
  22. White, D. J., Barefoot, A. J., and Bolton, M. D. (2001) Centrifuge modeling of upheaval buckling in sand, Int. J. Physical Modeling in Geotechnics, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 19-28.
  23. Yasuda, S. (2003) Relationship between SPT N value and liquefaction by an earthquake, Foundation Practice, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 50-53.
  24. Yasuda, S. and Kiku, H. (2006) Uplift of sewage manholes and pipes during the 2004 Niigataken-Chuetsu earthquake, Soils and Foundations, Vol. 46, No. 6, pp. 885-894. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.46.885
  25. Yoshida, M., Tonoo, M., Miyajima, M., and Kitaura, M. (2006) Experimental study on countermeasure against liquefactioninduced floatation of manhole using recycled materials pecked in sandbag, The 42nd Japan National Conference on Geotechnical Engineering, JGS, Nagoya, Japan, pp. 1945-1956.