DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

호박꽃과실파리 성충의 수명과 생명표분석

Adult Longevity and Life table analysis of Striped fruit fly, Bactrocera scutellata (Hendel) (Diptera:Tephritidae)

  • Jeon, Sung-Wook (Horticultural & Herbal Crop Environment Division, National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kang, Teak-Jun (Horticultural & Herbal Crop Environment Division, National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science, RDA) ;
  • Cho, Myoung-Rae (Horticultural & Herbal Crop Environment Division, National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Kwang-Ho (Crop Protection Division, Department of Agriculture Biology, National Academy of Agricultural Science, RDA) ;
  • Lee, Sang Guei (Crop Protection Division, Department of Agriculture Biology, National Academy of Agricultural Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Ji Soo (Muju Agricultural Technology Center) ;
  • Park, Hae Woong (Horticultural & Herbal Crop Environment Division, National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science, RDA)
  • 투고 : 2012.09.19
  • 심사 : 2012.11.17
  • 발행 : 2012.12.01

초록

호박꽃과실파리(Bactrocera scutellata Hendel)의 성충 수명과 산란수를 7개 온도(15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, $33{\pm}1.0^{\circ}C$, RH $65{\pm}5%$, 14L : 10D)에서 조사하여 생명표를 작성하였다. 온도별 성충수명은 $21^{\circ}C$에서 수컷이 138.0일 암컷이 131.2일로 가장 오래 살았으며, $21^{\circ}C$를 기준으로 저온부와 고온부로 갈수록 수명이 급격히 감소하였다. 온도별 암컷은 $18^{\circ}C$이하의 온도에서 산란을 하지 않았으며, $33^{\circ}C$에서는 짝짓기가 가능한 시기까지 살지 못하고 모두 사망하였다. 짝짓기한 암컷의 총 산란수는 111.4개, 일일 산란수는 1.0개로 $24^{\circ}C$에서 가장 많은 산란수를 보였고 순증가율($R_o$)은 $21^{\circ}C$에서 52.27로 가장 높은 수치를 나타냈다. 내적자연증가율($r_m$)은 $27^{\circ}C$에서 0.07을 보였으며, 배수기간(${\lambda}$)은 $27^{\circ}C$에서 10.02로 가장 짧았다. 기간증가율($D_t$)은 $27^{\circ}C$에서 1.07로 가장 큰 값을 보였고, 평균세대기간(T)은 $27^{\circ}C$에서 50.39였다.

The life table of the Striped Fruit Fly, Bactrocera scutellata, was analyzed by using adult longevity and fecundity of B. scutellata at seven constant temperatures (15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, $33{\pm}1.0^{\circ}C$) with 65% RH and 16L:8D in the laboratory. The highest values of longevity were observed at $21^{\circ}C$ with the values of 138.0 days for male and 131.2 days for female, respectively. Females of B. scutellata did not oviposit under $18^{\circ}C$ and larvae of B. scutellata could not survive to adulthood over $33^{\circ}C$. The highest value of total fecundity was observed at $24^{\circ}C$ (111.4 eggs) and daily fecundity per female was observed at approximately 1.0. The parameters of the life table were calculated by using the data from eggs to adults of B. scutellata at 4 different temperatures. Net reproduction rate ($R_o$) was highest at $21^{\circ}C$ (52.27). The intrinsic rate of increase ($r_m$) and the finite rate of increase per day (${\lambda}$) were highest at $27^{\circ}C$ (0.07 and 1.07), respectively. The doubling time ($D_t$) was shortest at $27^{\circ}C$ (with 10.02). The mean generation time (T) was shortest at $27^{\circ}C$(50.39).

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Fletcher, B.S., 1987. The biology of Dacine fruit flies. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 32, 115-144. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.32.010187.000555
  2. Han, H.Y., Kwon, Y.J., 2000. Economic Insects of Korea 3. National institute of agricultural science and technology Suwon, Korea.
  3. Han, M.J., Lee, S.H., Ahn, S.B., Choi, J.Y., Choi, K.M., 1994. Distribution, damage and host plants of pumpkin fruit fly, Paradacus depressua (Shiraki). RDA. J. Agri. Sci. 36, 346-350.
  4. Jeon, S.W. 2008. Biological characteristics of Bactrocera (Paradacus) depressa (Shiraki). M. S. Thesis, Chonbuk National Univ. press, Korea.
  5. Jeon, S.W., Cho, M.R., Kim, Y.P., Lee, S.G., Lee, J.J., Kim, S.H., Yu, J., Hwang, C.Y., 2011. Temperature-dependent development model of the Striped fruit fly, Bactrocera scutellata (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae) Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 50, 373-378. https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2011.50.4.373
  6. Jung, H.K., 1994. Check list of insects from Korea, 1st ed., Kon-kuk Univ. press, Korea.
  7. Kim, J.S., 1999. Distribution and life cycle of Bactrocera (Paradacus) depressa (Shiraki) in Chonbuk Province. M. S. Thesis, Chonbuk National Univ. press, Korea.
  8. Kim, J.I., Chang, K.S., 1982. On the summer seasonal insects from the group of Soan island, Wando - kun. Report on the survey of natural environment in Korea, 2, 161-184.
  9. Kim, Y.P., Jeon, S.W., Lee, S.G., Choi, N.J., Hwang, C.H., 2010. Seasonal occurrence and damage of Bactrocera scutellata (Diptera : Tephritidae) in Jeonbuk province. Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 49, 299-304. https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2010.49.4.299
  10. Liu, X, Ye, H., 2009. Effect of temperature on development and survival of Bactrocera correcta (Diptera : Tephritidae). Sci. Res. Essay 4, 467-472.
  11. Meyer, J.S., Igersoll, C.G., MacDonald, L.L., Boyce, M.S., 1986. Estimating uncertainty in population growth rates: Jackknife vs bootstrap techniques. Ecology 67, 1156-1166. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938671
  12. Miyatake, T., Kuba, H., Yukawa, J., 2000. Seasonal occurrence of Bactrocera scutellata (Diptera : Tephritidae), a cecidophage of stem galls produced by Lasioptera sp.(Diptera : Cecidomyiidae) on wild gourds (Cucurbitaceae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 93, 1274-1279. https://doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2000)093[1274:SOOBSD]2.0.CO;2
  13. SAS Institute, 1999. SAS version 9.1, SAS, Institute Cary, N.C.
  14. Shiraki, T., 1968. Fruit flies of the Ryukyu islands. Smithsonian institution museum bulletin 263, Washington D.C. pp.12-14.
  15. Sugimoto, S., Kanda, M., Tanaka, K., Tao, M., 1988. Some biological note on Dacus scutellatus (HENDEL). Res. Bull. Pl. Prot. AFFRIT 24, 49-51.
  16. White, I.M., Elson-Harris, M.M., 1992. Fruit flies of economic significance: Their Identification and Bionomics. 1st ed., CABI, London.
  17. Yang, P., 1988. Status of fruit fly research in China. Res. Ins. Entomol. Zhongshan (Sun Yatsen) Univ. press, Guangzhou.

피인용 문헌

  1. Integrated Pest Management Against Bactrocera Fruit Flies 2016, https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2016.10.0.026
  2. Taxonomy of Korean Bactrocera (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae) with review of their biology 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2017.09.011
  3. : Electrophysiological and behavioral study pp.07394462, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/arch.21510