DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Pork Preference for Consumers in China, Japan and South Korea

  • Oh, S.H. (North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University) ;
  • See, M.T. (North Carolina State University)
  • 투고 : 2011.10.14
  • 심사 : 2011.11.20
  • 발행 : 2012.01.01

초록

Competition in global pork markets has increased as trade barriers have opened as a result of free trade agreements. Japanese prefer both loin and Boston butt, while Chinese prefer pork offal. Frozen pork has increased in terms of imports into China. Japanese consumers consider pork meat origin along with pork price when making purchase decisions. While the Chinese prefer a strong tasting pork product, South Korean consumers show very strong preferences to pork that is higher in fat. Therefore, South Korean consumers have a higher demand for pork belly and Boston butt. Consequently, the supply and demand of pork in Korea is hardly met, which means that importation of high fat parts is inevitable. In Korea there is lower preference toward low fat parts such as loin, picnic shoulder, and ham. During the economic depression in South Korea there have been observable changes in consumer preferences. There remains steep competition among the pork exporting countries in terms of gaining share in the international pork market. If specific consumer preferences would be considered carefully, there is the possibility to increase the amount of pork exported to these countries.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Amponsah, W. A., X. D. Qin and X. Peng. 2003. China as a potential market for US pork exports. Review of Agricultural Economics. 25(1):259-269. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9353.00058
  2. China's Pork Industry: Recent Trends and Implications for World Meat Trade and Grains Trade. 2008. Informa Economics.
  3. Cho, S., B. Park, T. Ngapo, J. Kim, E. Dransfield, I. Hwang. 2007. Effect of meat appearance on South Korean consumers' choice of pork chops determined by image methodology. J. Sens. Stud. 22:99-114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.2007.00098.x
  4. Economic Review - The South Korean-EU Free Trade Agreement Negotiations: Some Observations. 2009. Bank of Tokyo - Mitsubishi UFJ.
  5. Felt, M., J. Gervais and B. Larue. 2011. Market power and import bans: the case of Japanese pork imports. Agribusiness. 27(1):47-61. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.20249
  6. Fukase, M. 2007. The basic consideration of our country pork distribution. Japanese meat trade institute.
  7. Hoshino, T. 2006. Research report of commodity export industries in Latin America. Asia Economy Institute.
  8. Kim, M. K., J. S. Park and K. S. Jeong. 2007. The Price Effect Analysis of Generic Pork Advertisement. Korean Journal of Agricultural Management and Policy. 34(2):389-401.
  9. Korea Meat Trade Association. 2010. http://www.kmta.or.kr.
  10. Korea Swine Association. 2009-2010. http://www.koreapork.or.kr.
  11. Inside China Pork Trade. 2009. Canada
  12. International food supply and demand report. 2009. Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries.
  13. Japan meat information service center. 2009. http://www.jmi.or.jp/info/survey_files/file0/46.pdf
  14. Livestock and Poultry: World Markets and Trade. 2011. USDA.
  15. Makise, K. 2002. Maintaining and expanding pork export to Japan. Advances in Pork Production. 13:5-15.
  16. Manger, M. 2005. Competition and bilateralism in trade policy: The Case of Japan's Free Trade Agreements. Review of International Political Economy 12(5):804-828. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290500339800
  17. Ngapo, T. M., J.-F. Martin and E. Dransfield. 2007. International preferences for pork appearance: I. Consumer choices. Food Qual. Prefer. 18:26-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.07.001
  18. Ortega, D., H. Wang and L. Wu. 2009. Assessing consumer preferences and attitudes toward imported pork in Urban China. International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference, Beijing, China.
  19. PIC. 2006. PIC worldwide survey. PIC company.
  20. Quick Facts: The Pork Industry at a Glance. 2009. Pork checkoff.
  21. Swine production report. 2009. Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries.
  22. The Chinese Market for US Pork Exports. 1997. Iowa State University.
  23. Ubilava, D., K. A. Foster, J. L. Lusk and T. Nilsson. 2011. Differences in consumer preferences when facing branded versus non-branded choices. J. Consumer. Behav. 10:61-70. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.349
  24. Vonada, M. L., B. S. Bidner, K. E. Belk, F. K. McKeith, W. R. Lloyd, M. E. O'Connor, and G. C. Smith. 2000. Quantification of pork belly and Boston butt quality attribute preferences of South Korean customers. J. Anim. Sci. 78:2608-2614.
  25. Wang, Q., F. Fuller, D. Hayes and C. Halbrendt. 1998. Chinese consumer dem and for animal products and implications for US Pork and poultry exports. J. Agricultural and Applied Economics. 30:127-140.

피인용 문헌

  1. Effects of Increasing Market Weight of Finishing Pigs on Backfat Thickness, Incidence of the 'Caky-fatty' Belly, Carcass Grade, and Carcass Quality Traits vol.55, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2013.55.3.195
  2. Establishment of reference conditions for nutrients in an intensive agricultural watershed, Eastern China vol.21, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-2166-z
  3. Effects of Partial Substitution of Lean Meat with Pork Backfat or Canola Oil on Sensory Properties of Korean Traditional Meat Patties (Tteokgalbi) vol.34, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2014.34.4.496
  4. Antimicrobial use in Chinese swine and broiler poultry production vol.4, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-015-0050-y
  5. Characteristics of pork belly consumption in South Korea and their health implication vol.57, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40781-015-0057-1
  6. Application of AutoFom III equipment for prediction of primal and commercial cut weight of Korean pig carcasses vol.31, pp.10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0240
  7. Russian and Chinese consumers' acceptability of boar meat patties depending on their sensitivity to androstenone and skatole vol.121, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.06.003
  8. Antecedents of Turnover Intention : Focused on Employees of Corporation Including Distribution in China, Japan and Korea vol.16, pp.9, 2012, https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.16.9.201809.13
  9. Quality characteristics and flavor compounds of pork meat as a function of carcass quality grade vol.32, pp.9, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0965
  10. Transcriptome Profiling Associated with Carcass Quality of Loin Muscles in Crossbred Pigs vol.10, pp.8, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10081279
  11. Single-Step Genomic Evaluation for Meat Quality Traits, Sensory Characteristics, and Fatty-Acid Composition in Duroc Pigs vol.11, pp.9, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11091062
  12. Comparison of Quality Characteristics and Palatability between Sous-Vide Cooked Pork Loin Patties with Different Searing Treatments vol.41, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2020.e90
  13. Investigation of Physicochemical and Sensory Quality Differences in Pork Belly and Shoulder Butt Cuts with Different Quality Grades vol.41, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2020.e91
  14. Analysis on difference of consumer's evaluation on visual features of pork cuts vol.63, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2021.e58
  15. Meat quality characteristics of pork bellies in relation to fat level vol.34, pp.10, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.20.0612