DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Self-controlled Feedback on Proprioception in Elbow Flexion of Healthy Subjects

정상성인의 팔굽 굽힘 시 자기통제 피드백이 고유수용성감각에 미치는 영향

  • Yoon, Jung-Gyu (Department of Physical Therapy, Namseoul University)
  • 윤정규 (남서울대학교 물리치료학과)
  • Received : 2012.08.30
  • Accepted : 2012.10.16
  • Published : 2012.11.30

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate effect of self-controlled feedback on proprioception in elbow flexion. METHODS: Thirty young adult volunteered to participate and were randomly assigned to one of three groups (self-controlled, yoked, control). Power and velocity in elbow flexion was measured by PRIMUS RS (BTE Tech., Hanover, U.S.A). Statistical analysis was used multivariate ANOVA to know effect of self-controlled feedback on proprioception in elbow flexion. Post hoc was used Scheffe. RESULTS: In acquisition phase to practice effect, variable errors in self-controlled group was significantly low scored more than yoked and control group. In retention phase to learning effect, variable errors in self-controlled group was significantly low scored more than yoked and control group. CONCLUSION: Self-controlled feedback was more effective on movement control when the learner could make a decision about receiving feedback after the trial. This seems to support the view that self-controlled feedback benefits learning, because learners can make a decision about feedback based on their performance on a given trial.

Keywords

References

  1. Adler SS, Beckers D & Buck M. PNF in practice: an illustrated guide. Hong Kong. Springer-Verlag. 1994.
  2. Butler MS, Reeve TG & Fischman MG. Effects of the instructional set in the bandwidth feedback paradigm on motor skill acquisition. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1996;67(3):355-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1996.10607964
  3. Carnahan H, Vandervoort AA & Swanson LR. The influence of summary knowledge of results and aging on motor learning. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1996;67(3):280-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1996.10607955
  4. Chiviacowsky S & Wulf G. Self-controlled feedback: does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it? Res Q Exerc Sport. 2002;73(4):408-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2002.10609040
  5. Chiviacowsky S & Wulf G. Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner's performance. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2005;76(1):42-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2005.10599260
  6. Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G, de Medeiros FL et al. Self-controlled feedback in 10-year-old children: higher feedback frequencies enhance learning. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2008;79(1):122-7.
  7. Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G, Lewthwaite R et al. Motor learning benefits of self-controlled practice in persons with Parkinson's disease. Gait Posture. 2012;35(4):601-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.12.003
  8. Huet M, Jacobs DM, Camachon C et al. Self-controlled concurrent feedback facilitates the learning of the final approach phase in a fixed-base flight simulator. Hum Factors. 2009;51(6):858-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720809357343
  9. Janelle CM, Barba DA, Frehlich SG et al. Maximizing performance effectiveness through videotape replay and a self-controlled learning environment. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1997;68(4):269-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1997.10608008
  10. Kim SJ. Motor learning and control. Seoul. Daehanmedia. 2001.
  11. Kim WC. How the self-controlled feedback affects in the kind of Serial skills' practice and learning. Kyungpook National Univ. Graduate School of Education. Master's thesis. 2011.
  12. Lee HW, Kim SG & Yook DW. Comparison of learning effect between self-control feedback and intermittent feedback. Journal of P. E Sport Leisure Studies. 2000;7(1):149-65.
  13. Lee TD & Maraj BK. Effects of bandwidth goals and bandwidth knowledge of results on motor learning. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1994;65(3):244-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1994.10607625
  14. McNevin NH, Wulf G & Carlson C. Effects of attentional focus, self-control, and dyad training on motor learning : implications for physical rehabilitation. Phys Ther. 2000;80(4):373-85. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/80.4.373
  15. Patterson JT, Carter M & Sanli E. Decreasing the proportion of self-control trials during the acquisition period does not compromise the learning advantages in a self-controlled context. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2011;82(4):624-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2011.10599799
  16. Schmidt RA & Lee TD. Motor control and learning. 3rd ed. Champaign. Human Kinetics. 2005.
  17. Schmidt RA, Young DE, Swinnen S et al. Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: support for the guidance hypothesis. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1989;15(2):352-9. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.15.2.352
  18. Sheaves EG, Snodgrass SJ & Rivett DA. Learning lumbar spine mobilization: the effects of frequency and self-control of feedback. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42(2): 114-24. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2012.3691
  19. Widrick JJ, Norenberg KM, Romatowski JG et al. Forcevelocity-power and force-pCa relationships of human soleus fibers after 17 days of bed rest. J Appl Physiol. 1998;85(5):1949-56. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1998.85.5.1949
  20. Winstein CJ. Knowledge of results and motor learning--implications for physical therapy. Phys Ther. 1991;71(2):140-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/71.2.140
  21. Winstein CJ & Schmidt RA. Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1990;16(4):677-91. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.4.677
  22. Wulf G, Clauss A, Shea CH et al. Benefits of self-control in dyad practice. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2001;72(3):299-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2001.10608964
  23. Yoon JG, Kim MH & Yook DW. The effects of self-controlled learning on balance in hemiplegics. Journal of the Korean Academy of University Trained Physical Therapists. 2005;12(1):36-44.

Cited by

  1. 근피로 유발 시 개인 성향과 음악형식에 따른 무릎 폄근의 최대수의적수축력, 일률 간 상관분석 vol.8, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2013.8.4.593
  2. 전기자극방법이 앞십자인대 재건술환자의 근력과 통증, 관절가동범위 및 공포-회피반응에 미치는 영향 vol.18, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2017.18.6.538
  3. 탄력성 테이핑이 근 피로를 적용한 넙다리곧은근의 파워오차와 속도오차에 미치는 영향 vol.6, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.15268/ksim.2018.6.1.001