한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제32권8호
  • /
  • Pages.1295-1317
  • /
  • 2012
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Can Definitions Contribute to Alternative Conceptions?: A Meta-Study Approach

  • 투고 : 2012.07.31
  • 심사 : 2012.09.07
  • 발행 : 2012.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

There has been disagreement on the importance of definitions in science education. Yager (1983) believes that one crisis in science education was due to the considerable emphasis upon the learning of definitions. Hobson (2004) disagrees with physics textbooks that do not provide general definition on energy. Some textbooks explain that "there is no completely satisfactory definition of energy" or they can only "struggle to define it." In general, imprecise definitions in textbooks (Bauman, 1992) and inaccuracies in definition provided by teachers (Galili & Lehavi, 2006) may cause alternative conceptions. Besides, there are at least four challenges in defining physical concepts: precision, circularity, context and completeness in knowledge. These definitional problems that have been discussed in The Feynman Lectures, may impede the learning of physical concepts. A meta-study approach is employed to examine about five hundreds journal papers that may discuss definitions in physics, problems in defining physical concepts and how they may result in alternative conceptions. These journal papers are mainly selected from journals such as American Journal of Physics, International Journal of Science Education, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Physics Education, The Physics Teachers, and so on. There are also comparisons of definitions with definitions from textbooks, Dictionaries of Physics, and English Dictionaries. To understand the nature of alternative conception, Lee et al. (2010) have suggested a theoretical framework to describe the learning issues by synthesizing cognitive psychology and science education approaches. Taking it a step further, this study incorporates the challenges in semantics and epistemology, proposes that there are at least four variants of alternative conceptions. We may coin the term, 'alternative definitions', to refer to the commonly available definitions, which have these four problems in defining physics concepts. Based on this study, alternative definitions may result in at least four variants of alternative conceptions. Note that these four definitional problems or challenges in definitions cannot be easily resolved. Educators should be cognizant of the four variants of alternative conceptions which can arise from alternative definitions. The concepts of alternative definitions can be useful and possibly generalized to science education and beyond.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Alexander, (1939). Concepts and Definitions of Electromotive Force. American Journal of Physics, 7(1), 23-28. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1991390
  2. Alvegard, C., Anderberg, E., Svensson, L. & Johansson, T. (2010). The Interplay between Content, Expressions and Their Meaning when Expressing Understanding. Science & Education, 19(3), 283-303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-009-9207-5
  3. Aristotle (1934). Physics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  4. Arnold, M. & Millar, R. (1994). Children's and lay adults'views about thermal equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 16(4), 405-419. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069940160403
  5. Arons, A. B. (1999). Development of energy concepts in introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 67(12), 1063-1067. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19182
  6. Bacon, F. (1620/1898). Novum Organum. London: George Bell & Sons.
  7. Baierlein, R. (1994). Entropy and the second law: A pedagogical alternative. American Journal of Physics, 62(1), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17732
  8. Balamuth, L., Wolfe, H. C. & Zemansky, M. W. (1941). The temperature concept from the macroscopic point of view. American Journal of Physics, 9(8), 199-203. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1991676
  9. Bauman, R. P. (1992). Physics that textbook writers usually get wrong: II Heat and Energy. The Physics Teacher, 30(9), 353-6. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2343574
  10. Bazire, M., & Bre、zillon, P. (2005). Understanding Context Before Using It. (Dey, A., Kokinov B., Leake, D. & Turner, R. Eds.) Modeling and Using Context, 3554, 29-40. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/11508373_3
  11. Berg, B. L. (2009). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  12. Beynon, J. (1994). A few thoughts on energy and mass. Physics Education, 29(2), 86. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/29/2/006
  13. Bierman, J. & Kincanon, E. (2003). The Physics Teacher, 41(6), 340-344. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1607804
  14. Bishop, R. (1999). Weight - An Accurate, Upto-Date, Layman's Definition. The Physics Teacher, 37(4), 238-9.
  15. Black, J. (1775). The supposed effect of boiling upon water in disposing it to freeze more readily. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A, 65, 124-128. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1775.0014
  16. Breithaupt, J. (1995). Understanding Physics for Advanced Level (3th ed.). Cheltenham: Stanley Thorne.
  17. Brookes, D. & Etkina, E. (2009). Force, ontology and language. Physical Review, Special Topics, Physics Education Research, 5(1), 010110.
  18. Brooks, M. (2009). Seven things that don't make sense about gravity. New Scientist. 202, 28-32.
  19. Brown, R. (1999). Weight Don't use the word at all. The Physics Teacher, 37(4), 241. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.880241
  20. Carlton, K. (2000). Teaching about heat and temperature. Physics Education, 35(5), 101-5. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/35/2/304
  21. Carnot, S. (1824/1988). Reflections on the Motive Power of Fire. edited E Mendoza. Mineola, New York: Dover.
  22. Chi, M. T. H., Slotta, J. D. & deLeeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 27-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90017-5
  23. Clement, J. (1982). Students'preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50(1), 66-71. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.12989
  24. Coelho, R. L. (2012). Conceptual Problems in the Foundations of Mechanics. Science & Education. 21(9), 1337-1356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9336-x
  25. Crew, H. (1929). General Physics. Macmillan.
  26. Crundell, M. (2001). AS/A Level Physics. Oxfordshire: Philip Allan Updates.
  27. de Berg K. C. (2008). The Concepts of Heat and Temperature: The Problem of Determining the Content for the Construction of an Historical Case Study which is Sensitive to Nature of Science Issues and Teaching-Learning Issues. Science & Education, 17(1), 75-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9040-z
  28. Deeson, E. (2007). Collins internet-linked dictionary of Physics. London: HarperCollins.
  29. Dictionary of Physics (2005). London: Constable & Robinson.
  30. Driver, R. & Warrington, L. (1985). Students use of the principle of energy conservation in problem situations. Physics Education, 20(4), 171-176. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/20/4/308
  31. Einstein, A. (1905). On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies. Annalen der Physik, 17(10), 891-921.
  32. Ferguson-Hessler, M. G. M. & de Jong, T. (1987). On the quality of knowledge in the field of electricity and magnetism. American Journal of Physics, 55(6), 492-497. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.15101
  33. Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B. & Sands, M. L. (1963). The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol 1. Redwood City: Addison Wesley.
  34. Feynman, R. P. (1969). What is Science? The Physics Teacher, 7(6), 313-320. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2351388
  35. Feynman, R. P. (1998). The Meaning of It All. Massachusetts: Addison Wesley.
  36. French, A. P. (1968). Special relativity. New York: W W Norton.
  37. French, A. P. (2000). Is Maxwell's Displacement Current a Current? The Physics Teacher, 38(5), 274-6. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.880530
  38. Galili, I. (1993). Weight and Gravity: teachers'ambiguity and students'confusion about the concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 15(1), 149-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069930150204
  39. Galili, I. & Kaplan, D. (1996). Students' Operation with the Concept of Weight. Science Education, 80(4), 457-487. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199607)80:4<457::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-C
  40. Galili, I. & Lehavi Y. (2006). Definitions of Physical Concepts: A study of physics teachers' knowledge and views. International Journal of Science Education, 28(5), 521-541. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500338847
  41. Gao, L. B. (1998). Cultural Context of School Science Teaching and Learning in the People's Republic of China. Science Education, 82(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199801)82:1<1::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-L
  42. Giordano, N. J. (2010). College Physics: Reasoning and Relationships. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning.
  43. Gomez, E. J. & Duran, E. F. (1998). Didactic Problems in the Concept of Electric Potential Difference and an Analysis of its Philogenesis. Science & Education, 7(2), 129-141. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008670631398
  44. Grayson, D. J. (2004). Concept substitution: A teaching strategy for helping students disentangle related physics concepts. American Journal of Physics, 72(8), 1126-1133. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1764564
  45. Gunstone, R. F. & White, R. T. (1981). Understanding of gravity. Science Education, 65(3), 291-299. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730650308
  46. Halliday, D., Resnick, R. & Walker, J. (2005). Fundamentals of Physics (7th ed.). New York: Wiley.
  47. Halloun, I. A. & Hestenes, D. (1985). Common sense concepts about motion. American Journal of Physics, 53(11), 1056-1065. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.14031
  48. Harper, J. (2003). Archimedes'Principle and the FCI. The Physics Teacher, 41(9), 510. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1631615
  49. Harris, J. (1969). Temperature - its meaning and measurement. Physics Education, 4(4), 204-6. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/4/4/303
  50. Hatsopoulos, G. N. & Keenan, J. H. (1965). Principles of General Thermodynamics. Chichester: John Wiley.
  51. Hayakawa, S. I. & Hayakawa, A. R. (1990). Language in thought and action, 5th edition. Harcourt Brace.
  52. Hecht, E. (2003). Physics: Algebra/Trig (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove: Thomson Learning.
  53. Hecht, E. (2006). There is No Really Good Definition of Mass. The Physics Teacher, 44(1), 40-45. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2150758
  54. Heisenberg, W. (1967). Nonlinear problems in physics. Physics Today, 20(5), 27-33.
  55. Helsdon, R. M. (1976). Teaching thermodynamics. Physics Education, 11(4), 261-2. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/11/4/101
  56. Hestenes, D., Wells, M. & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30(3), 141-158. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2343497
  57. Hewitt, P. (2006). Conceptual Physics (10th ed.). San Francisco: Addison Wesley.
  58. Hobson, A. (2003). Physics: Concepts and Connections (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  59. Hobson, A. (2004). Energy and work. The Physics Teacher, 42(5), 260.
  60. Hudson, R. C. & Munley, F. (1996). Re-score the Force Concept Inventory! The Physics Teacher, 34(5), 261. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2344431
  61. Iona, M. (1973). Energy is the Ability to do Work. The Physics Teacher, 11(5), 259. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2349994
  62. Iona, M. (1975). The Meaning of Weight. The Physics Teacher, 13(5), 263-274. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2339145
  63. Iona, M. (1987). Weightlessness is Real. The Physics Teacher, 25(7), 418.
  64. Iona, M. (1999). Weight An Official Definition. The Physics Teacher, 37(4), 238.
  65. Itza-Ortiz, S. F., Rebello N. S., Zollman D. A. & Rodriguez-Achach M. (2003). The Vocabulary of Introductory Physics and its implications for learning physics. The Physics Teacher, 41(9), 330-336. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1607802
  66. Johnson K., Hewett S., Holt, S. & Miller, J. (2000). Advanced Physics for You. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes.
  67. Karplus, R. (2003). Introductory Physics: A Model Approach (2nd ed.). Buzzards Bay: Captain's Engineering Services.
  68. Keyes, O. B. (1973). The concept of temperature again. Physics Education, 8(1), 60.
  69. Kruger, C. J., Summers, M. K. & Palacio, D. J. (1990). An investigation of some English primary school teachers'understanding. British Educational Research Journal, 16(4), 383-397. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192900160406
  70. Kurnaz, M. A. & Saǧlam-Arslan, A. (2011). A Thematic Review of Some Studies Investigating Students'Alternative Conceptions about Energy. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 3(1), 51-74.
  71. Langsberg, G. S. (1971/2000). Textbook of Elementary Physics, Volume 1. Honolulu, Hawaii: University Press of the Pacific.
  72. Lederman, N. G. & O'Malley, M. (1990). Students'perceptions of tentativeness in science: Development, use, and sources of change. Science Education, 74(2), 225-239. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730740207
  73. Lee, G., Shin, J., Park, J., Song, S., Kim, Y. & Bao, L. (2005a). An Integrated Theoretical Structure of Mental Models in Science Education: Students'ideas of the circular motion. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education. 25(6), 698-709.
  74. Lee, G., Shin, J., Park, J., Song, S., Kim, Y. & Bao, L. (2005b). Alternative conceptions, memory, & mental models in physics education. 2004 Physics Education Research Conference. 1ed. Sacramento, California (USA): AIP. 165-168.
  75. Leff, H. S. (2007). Entropy, Its Language, and Interpretation. Foundations of Physics, 37(12), 1744-1766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-007-9163-3
  76. Lindsay, R. B. (1937). A Critique of Operationalism in Physics. Philosophy of Science, 4(4), 456-470. https://doi.org/10.1086/286477
  77. Mach, E. (1883/1989). The science of mechanics. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
  78. Mayer, J. R. (1842). Bemerkungen umber die Krafte der unbelebten Natur. Annalen der Chemie und Pharmacie. In J. R. Mayer (Ed.), Die Mechanik der Warme: Samtliche Schriften (Vol. 42, pp. 233-240). HP Munzenmayer, Stadtarchiv Heilbronn, Stadtarchiv Heilbronn, Heilbronn.
  79. Mendelson, K. S. (2003). Physical and colloquial meanings of the term "work". American Journal of Physics, 71(3), 279-281. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1522707
  80. Moore, G. S. M. (1993). General, restricted and misleading forms of the First law of thermodynamics. Physics Education, 28(4), 228-237. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/28/4/007
  81. Moore, T. A. (2003). Six Ideas That Shaped Physics. Unit C: Conservation Laws Constrain Interactions (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  82. Mullet, E. & Gervais, H. (1990). Distinction between the concept of weight and mass in high school students. International Journal of Science Education, 12(2), 217-226. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069900120210
  83. Mungan, C. (2005). Work and Energy. American Journal of Physics, 73(3), 197-198.
  84. Newburgh, R. (2009). Carnot to Clausius: caloric to entropy. Europe Journal of Physics, 30(4), 713-728. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/30/4/006
  85. Newton, I. (1687/1999). Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  86. Noce, G., Torosantucci, G. & Vincentini, M. (1988). The floating of objects on the moon: prediction from a theory or experimental facts? International Journal of Science Education, 10(1), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069880100106
  87. Okun, L. B. (1989). The concept of mass (Mass, Energy, Relativity). Sov. Phys. Usp., 32(7), 629-638. https://doi.org/10.1070/PU1989v032n07ABEH002739
  88. Palmer, D. (2001). Students'alternative conceptions and scientifically acceptable conceptions about gravity. International Journal of Science Education, 23(7), 691-706. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690010006527
  89. Papadouris, N. & Constantinou, C. P. (2011). A Philosophically Informed Teaching Proposal on the Topic of Energy for Students Aged 11-14. Science & Education. 20(10), 961-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9305-4
  90. Parton, C. G. (1975). Weight and mass. Physics Education, 10(1), 58.
  91. Paterson, B. L., Thorne, S. E., Canam, C., & Jillings, C. (2001). Meta-study of qualitative health research: A practical guide to metaanalysis and meta-synthesis. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
  92. Piaget, J. (1974). Understanding causality. New York: Norton.
  93. Redish, E. F. (2003). Teaching Physics with the Physics Suite. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  94. Redish, E. F. (2004). A Theoretical Framework for Physics Education Research: Modeling student thinking, in Proceedings of the International School of Physics, -Enrico Fermi Course CLVI, Redish, E. F. & Vicentini, M. (eds.) Amsterdam: IOS.
  95. Rickheit, G. & Sichelschmidt, L. (1999). "Mental Models: Some Answers, Some Questions, Some Suggestions" in Mental Models in Discourse Processing and Reasoning, edited by Rickheit G. & Habel C., North-Holland: Elsevier, pp. 9-40.
  96. Robertson, B. (2008). Science 101: Do balance and scales determine an object's mass or its weight? Science and Children, 45(7), 68-71.
  97. Roche, J. (1971). Teaching heat using the joule. Physics Education, 6(2), 125. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/6/2/114
  98. Roche, J. (1989). Applying the history of electricity in the classroom: a reconstruction of the concept of 'Potential'In "Teaching the History of Science ed Michael Shortland & Andrew Warwick". Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 168-184.
  99. Rogers, E. H. (1981). Methodology for metaresearch. Presidential address at the conference of the International Communication Association.
  100. Romer, R. H. (2001). Heat is not a noun. American Journal of Physics, 69(2), 107-9. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1341254
  101. Rossing, T. D. (1995). Magnetic forces and fields: A note on terminology, definitions, and pedagogy. American Journal of Physics, 63(10), 957-958. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18041
  102. Ruggiero, S., Cartelli, A., Dupre, F. & Vincentini-Missoni, M. (1985). Weight, gravity and air pressure: mental representations by Italian middle school pupils. European Journal of Science Education, 7(2), 181-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528850070209
  103. Scherr, R. E., Shaffer, P. S. & Vokos, S. (2001). Student understanding of time in special relativity: Simultaneity and reference frames. American Journal of Physics, 69(7), S24-S35. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1371254
  104. Sears, F. W. (1950). Mechanics, Heat and Sound. Addison-Wesley.
  105. Serway, & Faughn J. S. (2003). College physics (6th ed). California: Thomson Learning.
  106. Sexl, R. U. (1981). Some observations concerning the teaching of energy concept. European Journal of Science Education, 3(3), 285-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528810030305
  107. Shaffer, P. S. & McDermott, L. C. (1992). Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity. Part II: Design of instructional strategies. American Journal of Physics, 60(11), 1003-1013. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.16979
  108. Shaw, R. E. M. (1969). A question of heat. Physics Education, 4(4), 251-2. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/4/4/120
  109. Slisko, J. J. & Dykstra D. I. (1997). The Role of Scientific Terminology in Research and Teaching: Is Something Important Missing? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(6), 655-660. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199708)34:6<655::AID-TEA7>3.0.CO;2-M
  110. Smith, P. L. & Ragan, T. J. (1999). Instructional design. USA: John Wiley & Sons. Soter, S. (2007). What is a Planet? Scientific American, 296(1), 34-41.
  111. Spalding, D. B. & Cole, E. H. (1966). Engineering Thermodynamics. London: Edward Arnold.
  112. Stuart, M. C. (1938). Use and Meaning of the Term Heat. American Journal of Physics, 6(2), 40.
  113. Suzuki, M. (2005). Social Metaphorical Mapping of the Concept of Force "CHI-KA-RA" in apanese. International Journal of Science Education, 27(15,16), 1773-1804. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500206507
  114. Swartz, C. E. & Miner, T. (1996). Teaching Introductory Physics: A Sourcebook. New York: AIP Press.
  115. Swendsen, R. H. (2011). How physicists disagree on the meaning of entropy. American Journal of Physics, 79(4), 342-8. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3536633
  116. Taber, K. S. (2000). Finding the optimum level of simplification: the case of teaching about heat and temperature. Physics Education, 35(5), 320-5. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/35/5/301
  117. Thomaz, M. F., Malaquias, I. M., Valente, M. C. & Antunes, M. J. (1995). An attempt to overcome alternative conceptions related to heat and temperature. Physics Education, 30(1), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/30/1/004
  118. Tipler, P. A. & Mosca, G. (2004). Physics for Scientists and Engineers (5th ed.). New York: W.H. Freeman & Company.
  119. Tribus, M. & McIrvine, E. C. (1971). Energy and information (thermodynamics and information theory). Scientific American, 225(9), 179-188. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0971-179
  120. Trowbridge D. E. & McDermott, L. C. (1981). Investigation of student understanding of the concept of acceleration in one dimension. American Journal of Physics, 49(3), 242-253. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.12525
  121. Van Camp, M., Camelbeeck, T. & Richard, P. (2003). The FG5 absolute gravimeter: metrology and geophysics. Physicalia Magazine, Journal of the Belgian Society, 25(3), 161-174.
  122. Warren, J. W. (1972). The teaching of the concept of heat. Physics Education, 7(1), 41-4. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/7/1/309
  123. Warren, J. W. (1983). Energy and its carriers: a critical analysis. Physics Education, 18(5), 209-212. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/18/5/306
  124. Whelan, P. M. & Hodgson, M. J. (1989). Essential Principles of Physics (2nd ed.). John Murray.
  125. Wilczek, F. (2005). Whence the Force of F = ma? 2: Rationalization. Physics Today, 58(12), 10-11.
  126. Wilczek, F. (2008). The Lightness of Being. New York: Basic Books.
  127. Williams, H. T. (1999). Semantics in teaching introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 67(8), 670-680. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19351
  128. Wilson, J. D., Buffa, A. J. & Lou, B. (2007). College Physics (6th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson.
  129. Wong, C. L. & Yap, K. C. (2010). In Search of a Framework to facilitate Statements of Definitions in Physics: Is Feynman's Lectures on Physics a good Guide? Paper presented at Global Chinese Conference on Science Education, 2010.
  130. Yager, R. E. (1983). The importance of terminology in teaching K 12 Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(6), 577-588. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660200610
  131. Yates, J. (1985). The content of awareness is a model of the world. Psychological Review, 92(2), 249-284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.2.249
  132. Yeo, S. & Zadnik, M. (2001). Introductory thermal concept evaluation: Assessing students' understanding. The Physics Teacher, 39(8), 496-504. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1424603
  133. Young, H. D. & Freedman (2004). Sears and Zemansky's University Physics (11th ed.). California: Addison Wesley.
  134. Zemansky, M. W. (1970). The use and misuse of the word "heat"in physics teaching. The Physics Teacher, 8(6), 295-300. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2351512

피인용 문헌

  1. vol.36, pp.15, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.893594
  2. An Analysis of the Descriptions of Chemical Element in Textbooks - Focusing on Differentiating from the Atom - vol.18, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2014.18.4.1239
  3. A categorisation of the terminological sources of student difficulties when learning chemistry vol.55, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2019.1694792