DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of light illumination and camera moving speed on soil image quality

조명 및 카메라 이동속도가 토양 영상에 미치는 영향

  • Chung, Sun-Ok (Department of Biosystems Machinery Engineering, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Cho, Ki-Hyun (Department of Biosystems Machinery Engineering, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Jung, Ki-Yuol (Department of Functional Crop, National Academy of Crop Science)
  • 정선옥 (충남대학교 바이오시스템기계공학과) ;
  • 조기현 (충남대학교 바이오시스템기계공학과) ;
  • 정기열 (국립식량과학원 기능성작물부 기능성잡곡과)
  • Received : 2012.05.29
  • Accepted : 2012.09.26
  • Published : 2012.09.30

Abstract

Soil texture has an important influence on agriculture such as crop selection, movement of nutrient and water, soil electrical conductivity, and crop growth. Conventionally, soil texture has been determined in the laboratory using pipette and hydrometer methods requiring significant amount of time, labor, and cost. Recently, in-situ soil texture classification systems using optical diffuse reflectometry or mechanical resistance have been reported, especially for precision agriculture that needs more data than conventional agriculture. This paper is a part of overall research to develop an in-situ soil texture classification system using image processing. Issues investigated in this study were effects of sensor travel speed and light source and intensity on image quality. When travel speed of image sensor increased from 0 to 10 mm/s, travel distance and number of pixel were increased to 3.30 mm and 9.4, respectively. This travel distances were not negligible even at a speed of 2 mm/s (i.e., 0.66 mm and 1.4), and image degradation was significant. Tests for effects of illumination intensity showed that 7 to 11 Lux seemed a good condition minimizing shade and reflection. When soil water content increased, illumination intensity should be greater to compensate decrease in brightness. Results of the paper would be useful for construction, test, and application of the sensor.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae SG, Yeon IK, Park SD, Kang CK, Zakaullah K. 2004. Effects of soil texture by soil addition on the growth and quality of oriental melon (Cucumis melo L. var. makuwa Mak.) under protected cultivation. Journal of Bio-Environment Control 13(3): 156-161. [in Korean]
  2. Breul P, Gourves R. 2006. In field soil characterization: approach based on texture image analysis. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 132(1): 102-107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:1(102)
  3. Hur BK. 1993. Effect of tillage methods on rice yield and soil properties under different soil textures. Korean Journal of Crop Science 38(3): 290-295. [in Korean]
  4. Hyun BK, Kim MS, Eom KC, Jo IS. 2000. A more simplified hydrometer method for soil texture analysis. Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer 33(3): 153-159. [in Korean]
  5. Kim DY, Choe YS. 2004. PSNR comparison of DCT-domain image resizing methods. The Journal of the Korean Institute of Communication Sciences 29(10C): 1484-1489. [in Korean]
  6. Lee SM, Kim SS, Park DS, Hur JH. 2005. Mobility of pesticides in different soil textures and gravel contents under soil column. The Korean Journal of Pesticide Science 9(4): 330-337. [in Korean]
  7. Lim DH. 2003. Development of a fruit sorting system using statistical image processing. Korean Journal of Applied Statistics 16(1): 129-140. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.5351/KJAS.2003.16.1.129
  8. Starr GC, Barak P, Lowery B, Avila-segura M. 2000. Soil particle concentrations and size analysis using a dielectric method. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64: 858-866. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2000.643858x
  9. Yoon CR, Cho MS. 2000. Illuminant estimation method of a color image using rgb chromaticity. Conference Proceedings of the Korea Information Science Society 27(2-II): 419-421. [in Korean]
  10. Zuo Y, Erbach DC, Marley SJ. 2000. Soil structure evaluation by using a fiber-optic sensor. Transactions of the ASAE 43(6): 1317-1322. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.3028