Journal of Fashion Business (패션비즈니스)

The Korean Society of Fashion Business (한국패션비즈니스학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Size between direct-measurement and 3D body scanning

중국 성인여성의 직접계측과 3D Body scanning 치수 비교 연구

  • Cha, Su-Joung (Dept. of Beauty Design, Major of Fashion, Woosong Univ.)
  • 차수정 (우송대학교 뷰티디자인학과 패션전공)
  • Received : 2012.01.25
  • Accepted : 2012.02.15
  • Published : 2012.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study intend to analyze differences between 3D body scanning sizes and direct measurement sizes of same subjects. The subjects of study are female students of university in China. 3D data analyze as a 3D Body Measurement Soft System. The conclusion found is as below: In case of circumferences, error between direct-measurement size and 3D body scanning size is from 4.9mm to 62.2mm. The neck circumference size of directmeasurement is bigger than 3D body scanning size. The height error range is from 0.6mm to 51mm. Height of underbust, waist and hip are that direct-measurement sizes are higher than 3D body scanning sizes. Gap of width is from 3.8mm to 21.9mm. The gap range is too narrow relatively to others. Only direct-measurement size of neck width is wider than 3D body scanning size. Error range of length is from 0.3mm to 41.8mm. 3D body scanning sizes of lateral neck to waistline, upperarm length, arm length, neck shoulder point to breast point, shoulder center point to breast point, lateral shoulder to breast point are longer than direct-measurement sizes. They have a negative margin of error. I intend to set up same measurement point between direct-measurement and 3D body scanning but they have some errors because direct-measurement point is applied by a person. 3D body scanning measurement point is settled by automatic system. A measurement point of direct-measurement and 3D body scanning isn't unite. So we need to make a standard of setting up measurement points.

Keywords

References

  1. Certain, A., Stuetzle, W. (1999), "Automatic Body Measurement for Mass Customization of Garments". IEEE, pp.405-412.
  2. Mckinnon, L., & Istook, C. L., (2002), "Body scanning", Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 6(2), pp.103-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/13612020210429458
  3. 한현숙, 남윤자(2009), "3차원 스캔측정치와 직접치수 간 차이의 성별 비교", 한국의류학회지, 33(8), pp.1190-1202.
  4. 백경자, 이정란(2008), "3차원 바디 스캐너를 이용한 남성 상반신 인체측정", 한국의류학회지, 32(1), p.25.
  5. M. A. Brunsman, H. Daanen, and K. M. Rovinette(1997), "Optimal Postures and positioning for Human body Scanning", Proceeding of International Conference on Recent Advanced in 3-D Digital Maping and Modeling , IEEE, Los Alamitos; Computer Society Press.
  6. 백경자, 이정란(2008), "3차원 바디 스캐너를 이용한 남성 상반신 인체측정", 한국의류학회지, 32(1), pp.32-34.
  7. 한현숙, 남윤자(2009), "3차원 스캔측정치와 직접치수 간 차이의 성별 비교", 한국의류학회지, 33(8), pp.1190-1202.
  8. Mckinnon, L., & Istook, C.L.(2001), "Comparative analysis of the image twin system and the 3T6 body scanner". Journal of Textile and Apparel Technology and Management, 1(2), pp.1-7.
  9. Robinette, K.M., & Daanen, H.A.(2006), "Precision of the CAESAR scan-extracted measurements". Applied Ergonomics, 37(3), pp.259-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2005.07.009
  10. 차수정(2008), "중국 성인여성용 브래지어 원형 개발 연구: 상해지역 20대 전반 여성을 중심으로", 숙명여자대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
  11. 산업자원부 기술표준원, 인체측정표준용어집, 2003.
  12. www.popularmechnics.com
  13. www.tc2.com
  14. 이정임, 주소령, Susan P. Ashdown(2004), "노년 여성 체형의 표준화된 3차원 측정 데이터 추출을 위한 기초 연구", 한국의류학회지, 28(2), pp.344-353.
  15. 백경자, 이정란(2008), "3차원 바디 스캐너를 이용한 남성 상반신 인체측정", 한국의류학회지, 32(1), pp.29-33.

Cited by

  1. Lower-body figure analysis of Chinese adult women vol.22, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7741/rjcc.2014.22.6.965
  2. A Comparison of Chinese Women's Lower Body Features in Shanghai and Hong Kong vol.17, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12940/jfb.2013.17.6.141