Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics (한국항공운항학회지)

The Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics (한국항공운항학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Experience Emotion on Pilot's Risk Perception: Interaction Effects of Emotion Regulation

경험정서가 조종사의 위험인식에 미치는 영향: 정서조절의 상호작용 효과

  • 엄태근 (한국경영경제연구원) ;
  • 한태영 (광운대학교 사회과학대학 산업심리학과)
  • Received : 2012.11.20
  • Accepted : 2012.12.21
  • Published : 2012.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify the effect of experience emotion (i.e., happy, proud, sad, fear) on the risk perception. This study also examined interaction effects of emotion regulation (i.e., reappraisal strategy, problem focused strategy) between experience emotion and risk perception. The study collected data from 168 flight crew members in Korean commercial airlines, using an online research in which an experiment of emotion manipulation and a survey were included. The results of the study found the positive effect of happiness emotion on the risk perception regarding cases 1(these cases have high possibility of negative result and low circumstance control) and the positive effect of sadness emotion on the risk perception regarding cases 2(these cases have low possibility of negative result and high circumstance control). This study also found the interaction effect of reappraisal emotion regulation strategy between the relationship of happiness and risk perception regarding cases 2. From these results, the study provided that theoretical and practical implication that happiness and sadness emotion contribute risk perception and reappraisal strategy has a moderating role in the relationship between happy emotion and risk perception. Finally, based on these results, the limitations of this study and future research were discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. 김칠영 (1993). 조종사의 의사결정에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구. 한국항공운항학회지, Vol. 1, No-, 95-132.
  2. 김칠영, 송병흠 (1994). 조종사의 의사결정에 영향을 미치는 인적 요인에 관한 연구. The collected theses of Hankuk Aviation Uni. Journal, Vol 32, 187-202.
  3. 박수애, 손영우, 김경태 (2007). 관제사의 운항 위험평가에 관한 인지과제분석. 한국심리학회지:산업 및 조직, Vol. 20, No. 2, 177-195.
  4. 설재욱, 손영우, 박수애 (2005). 정서와 정서지능이 상황인식에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지:산업 및 조직, Vol. 18, No. 1, 79-96.
  5. 손영우, 박수애, 김용석, 김찬, (2007). 민간항공 조종사의 비정상 운항 상황에 대한 위험 지각. 한국항공운항학회, Vol. 15, No. 3, 52-62.
  6. 옥수정 (2001). 억압적 성격 성향자의 정서적 특성과 정서 조절 방략. 서울대학교 석사학위논문.
  7. 이경수 (2010). 정상 상황과 비정상 상황에서 조종사의 수행을 예측하는 요인. 한국항공운항학회지, Vol. 18, No. 4, 92-99.
  8. 이다원, 이선희. (2011). 정서노동 전략과 상태정서가 직무탈진과 이직의도에 미치는 영향. 인간연구, Vol. -, No. 21, 111-139.
  9. 이영애, 이나경, (2005). 위험지각에 대한 한국인의 심리적 구조. 위험지각의 심리적 메카니즘, Vol 2005, No.-, 1-12.
  10. 이정모, 김민식, 감기택, 김정오, 박태진, 김성일, 이광오, 김영진, 이광오, 김영진, 이재호, 신현정, 도경수, 이영애, 박주용, 조은경, 관호완, 박창 호, 이재식, 이건효 (2003). 인지심리학. 학지사.
  11. 이주일 (2003). 조직 장면에서의 분노, 불안, 우울 정서- 정서 간 유발상황과 대처방식의 차이 및 정서의 조절과 심리적 안녕, 직무효과 간의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, Vol. 16, No. 3, 19-58.
  12. 이주일, 민경환 (1995). 기업 구성원의 조직 시민행동에 미치는 인지, 정서 및 성격의 효과. 심리과학, 4(2). 47 - 66.
  13. 조재한, 한태영 (2008). 평가정확성에 대한 평가자 훈련 유형의 영향: 책임석과 평가자 기분(mood)의 상호작용 효과. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, Vol. 21, No. 4, 745-768.
  14. 홍석진 (2002). 항공안전 측면의 인적요인과 조직문화에 대한 연구. 항공산업연구, Vol. 62, No -, 88-100.
  15. Ashkanasy, N. M., Zerbe, W. J., & Hartel, C. E. (2005). Research on emotion in organizations, Vol. 1: Affect and its effects in organizational settings, Oxford, UK: Elsevier/JAI Press.
  16. David Watson., & Lee Anna Clark. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule - Expanded Form. The University of Iowa.
  17. Ekmann, P., & Frieson, W. (1975). Unmasking the face. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-hall.
  18. Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotion ?. Review of General Psychology, 2, 300-319. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300
  19. Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotion. American Psychology, 56, 218-266. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218
  20. Fredrickson, B. L., Joiner, T. (2002). Positive emotions trigger upward spirals toward emotional well-being. American Psychological Society. Vol. 13, No. 2
  21. Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  22. Goh, J. & Wiegmann, D. (2002). Visual flight rules (VFR) flight in to instrument metelogical conditions (IMC): A review of the accident data. Paper presented at the 11th. Interantional Symposium of Aviation Psychology, Columbus, Ohio.
  23. Gross, J. J. (1988). The Emerging Field of Emotion Regulation: An Integrative Reciew. Review of General Psychology, Vol. 2, No. 3, 271-299.
  24. Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation in adulthood: Timing is everything. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 214-219.
  25. Gross, J. J., & Johnson O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationship, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348-362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348
  26. Hunter, D. R. (2002). Risk perception and risk tolerance in aircraft pilots. Technical report, Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aerospace Medicine, Washington, DC.
  27. James, W. K., Michelle N., & Shiota. (2007). 정서 심리학. 민경환, 이옥경, 김지현, 김민희, 김수안 역. 시그마 프레스.
  28. Johnson, E. J., & Tversky, A. (1983). Affect, generation, and the perception of risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 20-31. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.20
  29. KASI, (2011). 교관승무원 Crew Resource Management 특별과정. 교관승무원 교육 교재.
  30. Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2000). Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influence on judgement and choice. Cognition and Emotion, 14 (4), 473-493. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999300402763
  31. Morris, J. A., & Reilly, N. P. (1987). Toward the self-regulation of mood: Theory and research. Motivation and Emotion 11: 215-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01001412
  32. Rika Hohotasi, & Kyoko Imai-Matsumura. (2011). Emotional experience, expression, and regualtion of high-quality Japanese elementary school teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 1039-1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.03.010
  33. Robert, Plutchik. (1982). Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Volume 5, Issue 01, March 1982, pp 21-22 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0001027X
  34. Schmidt, S., Levine, L. J., Testa S., & Tinti, C. (2010). Appraisals, emotions and emotion regulation: An integrative approach. Motivation and Emotion, 34:63-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-010-9155-z
  35. Simon, H. A. (1957). Model of man. New York. p 198.
  36. Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, Vol. 236, No. 4799, 280-285. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3563507
  37. Slovic, P. (2000). The perception of risk. Earthscan, London, UK.
  38. Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Pattern of Cognitive Appraisal in Emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol 48, No. 4, 813-838. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.4.813
  39. Thayer, R. E., Newman, j. R., & McClain, T. M. (1994). Self-regulation of mood: Strategies for changing a bad mood, raising energy, and reducing tension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68: 1092-1107.
  40. Wiegmann, D. A. & Shappell, S. A. (2003). A human error approach to aviation accident analysis: The human factors analysis and classification system. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
  41. Yates, J. F. (1992). Risk-taking Behavior. Chichester: Wiley. 1992.