DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Coagulation Control of High Turbid Water Samples Using a Streaming Current Control System

유동흐름 전류계를 이용한 정수장 고탁도 유입수 응집 제어 방법에 대한 연구

  • Nam, Seung-Woo (Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Seoul National University) ;
  • Jo, Byung-Il (Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Won-Kyong (Sam Bo Scientific Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Zoh, Kyung-Duk (Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Seoul National University)
  • 남승우 (서울대학교 보건대학원 환경보건학과) ;
  • 조병일 (서울대학교 보건대학원 환경보건학과) ;
  • 김원경 (삼보과학) ;
  • 조경덕 (서울대학교 보건대학원 환경보건학과)
  • Received : 2012.03.29
  • Accepted : 2012.04.12
  • Published : 2012.04.30

Abstract

Objectives: This study was aimed at determining the optimum coagulation dosage in a high turbid kaolin water sample using streaming current detection (SCD) as an alternative to the jar test. Methods: SCD is able to optimize coagulant dosing by titration of negatively charged particles. Kaolin particles were used to mimic highly turbid water ranging from 50 to 600 NTU, and polyaluminum chloride (PAC, 17%) was applied as a titrant and coagulant. The coagulation consisted of rapid stirring (5 min at 140 rpm), reduced stirring (20 min at 70 rpm), and settling (60 min). To confirm the coagulation effect, a jar test was also compared with the SCD titration results. Results: SCD titration of kaolin water samples showed that the dose of PAC increased as the pH rose. However, supernatant turbidity less than 1 NTU after coagulation was not achieved for high turbid water by SCD titration. Instead, a conversion factor was used to calculate the optimum PAC dosage for high turbid water by correlating a jar test result with that from an SCD titration. Using this approach, we were able to successfully achieve less than 1 NTU in treated water. Conclusions: For high turbid water influent in a water treatment plant, particularly during summer, the application of SCD control by applying a conversion factor can be more useful than a jar test due to the rapid calculation of coagulation dosage. Also, the interpolation of converted PAC dose could successfully achieve turbidity in the treated water of less than 1 NTU. This result indicates that an SCD system can be effectively used in a water treatment plant even for high turbid water during the rainy season.

Keywords

References

  1. Yang ZH, Huang J, Zeng GM, Ruan M, Zhou CS, Li L, et al. Optimization of flocculation conditions for kaolin suspension using the composite flocculant of MBFGA1 and PAC by response surface methodology. Bioresour. Technol. 2009; 100(18): 4233-4239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.033
  2. Campbell A. The potential role of aluminium in Alzheimer's disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002; 17(suppl 2): 17-20. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/17.suppl_2.17
  3. Xia S, Li X, Zhang Q, Xu B, Li G. Ultrafiltration of surface water with coagulation pretreatment by streaming current control. Desalination. 2007; 204(1-3): 351-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2006.03.544
  4. Wu GD, Lo SL. Effects of data normalization and inherent-factor on decision of optimal coagulant dosage in water treatment by artificial neural network. Expert Syst Appl. 2010; 37(7): 4974-4983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.12.016
  5. Khayet M, Zahrim AY, Hial N. Modelling and optimization of coagulation of highly concentrated industrial grade leather dye by response surface methodology. Chem Eng J. 2011; 167(1): 77-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.11.108
  6. Lin JL, Huang C, Pan JR, Wang D. Effect of Al(III) speciation on coagulation of highly turbid water. Chemosphere. 2008; 72(2): 189-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.01.062
  7. The Martin hubbe's streaming current definitions and concepts. Available from: http://www4.ncsu.edu/ -hubbe/Defnitns/SteamCur.htm/. [accessed 1 March 2010].
  8. The Martin hubbe's plane of shear definitions and concepts. Available from: http://www4.ncsu.edu/-hubbe/Defnitns/ShearPln.htm/. [accessed 1 March 2010].
  9. Kweon JH, Hur HW, Seo GT, Jang TR, Park JH, Choi KY, et al. Evaluation of coagulation and PAC adsorption pretreatments on membrane filtration for a surface water in Korea: A pilot study. Desalination. 2009; 249(1): 212-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.08.014
  10. Di bernardo D. Performance of two-stage filtration system for treating high turbidity water. J Water Supply Res Technol-Aqua. 2006; 55(7-8): 499-515. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2006.042
  11. Zong D, Zhang X, Zhang G. Variation of streaming current along water treatment process. Environ Sci Technol. 2008; 11: 86-88.
  12. Dentel SK, Thomas AV, Kingery KM. Evaluation of the streaming current detector-I. use in jar tests. Water Res. 1989; 23(4): 413-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(89)90132-2
  13. Dentel SK, Thomas AV, Kingery KM. Evaluation of the streaming current detector-II. continuous flow tests. Water Res. 1989; 23(4), 423-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(89)90133-4
  14. Henneberry YK, Kraus TEC, Fleck JA, Krabbenhoft DP, Bachand PM, Horwath WR. Removal of inorganic mercury and methylmercury from surface waters following coagulation of dissolved organic matter with metal-based salts. Sci Total Environ. 2011; 409(3): 631-637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.10.030
  15. Chen J. Dependency of polyelectrolyte complex stoichiometry on the order of addition. 1. effect of salt concentration during streaming current titrations with strong poly-acid and poly-base. Colloids Surf A. 2003; 223(1-3): 215-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(03)00222-X
  16. Song ZX, Song Z, Zhao Y, Liu C. Research on predictive control of coagulant dosage based on neural network. IEEE. 2011; 1: 217-221.
  17. Bachand PAM, Bachand SM, Lopus SE, Heyvaert A, Werner I. Treatment with chemical coagulants at different dosing levels changes ecotoxicity of stormwater from the Tahoe basin, California, USA. J Environ Sci Health, Part A. 2010; 45(2): 137-154.
  18. Zaucha M, Adamczyk Z, Barbasz J. Zeta potential of particle bilayers on mica: a streaming potential study. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2011; In Press.
  19. Chae SH. Monitoring and automatic control of coagulation process by streaming current detector. J Kor Soc Water and Wastewater, 2001; 15(6): 542- 550.
  20. Lee BB, Choo KH, Chang D, Choi SJ. Optimizing the coagulant dose to control membrane fouling in combined coagulation/ultrafiltration systems for textile wastewater reclamation. Chem Eng J. 2009; 155(1-2): 101-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.07.014
  21. Lee H, Lee CH, Jung CG, Lee YJ. Improving coagulation performance with ph preadjustment in drinking water treatment. Kor J Environ Health Sci. 2003; 29(2): 1-6.
  22. Kim JK, Ko YS, Nam SH. A removal of heavy metals through conventional water treatment processes. Kor J Environ Health Sci. 1994; 20(4): 36- 44.
  23. Trinh TK, Kang LS. Response surface methodological approach to optimize the coagulation-flocculation process in drinking water treatment. Chem Eng Res Des. 2011; 89(7): 1126-1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2010.12.004
  24. Gregory J, Duan J. Hydrolyzing metal salts as coagulants. Pure Appl Chem. 2001; 73(12): 2017-2026. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac200173122017
  25. Zembala M, Dejardin P. Streaming potential measurements related to fibrinogen adsorption onto silica capillaries. Colloids Surf B. 1994; 3(1): 119-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-7765(93)01119-C
  26. Shin JY, Spinette RF, O-Melia, CR. Stoichiometry of coagulation revisited. Environ Sci Technol. 2008; 42(7): 2582-2589. https://doi.org/10.1021/es071536o
  27. Tadros T. Interparticle interactions in concentrated suspensions and their bulk (Rheological) properties. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2011; 168(1-2): 263- 277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2011.05.003
  28. Walker CA, Kirby JT, Dentel SK. The streaming current detector: a quantitative model. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1996; 182(1): 71-81. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1996.0438