정보관리학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society for information Management)

  • 제29권1호
  • /
  • Pages.395-404
  • /
  • 2012
  • /
  • 1013-0799(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2586-2073(eISSN)
한국정보관리학회 (Korean Society for Information Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

도서관 관종구분의 기준에 대한 고찰

A Suggestion of Criteria for Categorizing Libraries into Types: Linking between Library and Information

  • Kim, Gi-Yeong (Dept. Library and Information Science, Yonsei University) ;
  • Choi, Yoon-Hee (Dept. Library and Information Science, Yonsei University)
  • 투고 : 2012.03.24
  • 심사 : 2012.03.27
  • 발행 : 2012.03.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

도서관의 관종 구분은 도서관의 개념에 대한 이해 및 도서관 경영실무에서 각 도서관의 역할, 임무, 사명 및 업무 수행의 틀을 제공하는 데에 의의가 있다. 역사적으로 공공, 대학, 학교, 전문으로의 관종의 사구분법이 가장 일반적이나, 각 관종의 정의는 귀납적이고 열거적으로 내려져, 관종간 구분의 명확성이 떨어지고, 새로운 환경에서의 관종구분 적용을 곤란하게 하는 단점이 있다. 본 개념적 논문에서는 정보요구의 특성을 이용하여 도서관 관종의 사구분법에 대한 연역적인 기준을 제시한다. 또한 제시된 기준에 의한 사구분법의 도서관경영에 있어서의 의미를 제시하고, 특히 이해관계자(stakeholders)의 존재 및 도서관경영에 있어서의 영향을 논의한다. 추가로, 본 논문은 도서관 실무와 정보학영역을 개념적으로 연결하여 문헌정보학 내의 세부영역간 관련성을 강화하는 시도로서도 그 의미를 가진다.

The categorization of libraries into several types supports an understanding of the concept of library and also provides a framework for the practice of library management, such as planning and management. Although a 4-type categorization with public, academic, special, and school libraries is the most traditional and general approach to categorization, the definition of each type has been set enumeratively and inductively, so that it has weaknesses in its clarity between categories and in its applicability to a new environment. In this conceptual paper, deductive and analytical criteria for the 4-type categorization are suggested based on characteristics of information needs. Implications of the suggestions about library management, and especially, the meaning and impact of stakeholders on library management are discussed. Additionally, this paper attempts to put forth a conceptual link between library and information.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ashworth, W. (1979). Special librarianship. London: Clive Bingley.
  2. Atkinson, F. (1974). Librarianship: An introduction to the profession. Hamden, CT: Linnet Books & Clive Bingley.
  3. Boaz, M. Ed. (1979). Current concepts in library management. Littleton, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
  4. Byström, K., & Hansen, P. (2005). Conceptual framework for tasks in information studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56 (10), 1050-1061. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20197
  5. Case, D. O. (2007). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior (2nd Ed). London, UK: Academic Press.
  6. Chernik, B. E. (1992). Introduction to library services. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
  7. Choo, C., & Auster, E. (1993). Environmental scanning: Acquisition and use of information by managers. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 28, 279-314.
  8. Chowdhury, G. G., Burton, P. F., McMenemy, D., & Poulter, A. (2008). Librarianship: An introduction. London, UK: Facet Publishing.
  9. Curran, C., & Miller, L. (2005). Guide to library and information agency management. Lanham, MD: The Scarecrow Press.
  10. Feather, J. & Sturges, P. Ed. (1997). International encyclopedia of information and library science. New York, NY: Routledge.
  11. Gross, M. (2001). Imposed information seeking in public libraries and school library media centres: A common behavior? Information Research, 6(2). Downloaded from http://informationr.net/ir/6-2/paper100.html
  12. Kim, Giyeong (2008). A theoretical study on the concept of 'customer' as a replaced term with user. Journal of Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 42(2), 235-253. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2008.42.2.235
  13. Li, Y., & Belkin, N.J. (2008). A faceted approach to conceptualizing tasks in information seeking. Information Processing and Management, 44, 1822-1837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2008.07.005
  14. Limberg, L. (2007). Learning assignment as task in information seeking research. Information Research, 12(1). Available at: http://InformationR.net/ir/12-1/colis/colis28.html
  15. McCook, K. de la P. (2004). Introduction to public librarianship. New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers, Inc.
  16. Prytherch, R. (2005). Harrod's librarians' glossary and reference book (Tenth ed.). Ashgate Publishing.
  17. Reitz, J. M. (2004). Dictionary for library and information science. Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited.
  18. Rubin, R. E. (2004). Foundations of library and information science. New York, NY: Neal-Schuman Publishers.
  19. Shuman, B. A. (1992). Foundations and issues in library and information science. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
  20. Wikipedia (2010a). Public library. Available at: http://en/wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_library
  21. Wikipedia (2010b). Academic library. Available at: http://en/wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_libraries
  22. Wikipedia (2010c). Special library. Available at: http://en/wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_library
  23. Wikipedia (2010d). Library. Available at: http://en/wikipedia.org/wiki/Library

피인용 문헌

  1. A Study on Performance and Prediction Factors in College and University Libraries using Statistical Analyses vol.25, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2014.25.3.191