Breast Cancer Screening with MRI

유방암 스크리닝 자기공명영상

  • Cho, Nariya (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Moon, Woo-Kyung (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital)
  • 조나리야 (서울대학교병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 문우경 (서울대학교병원 영상의학과)
  • Received : 2012.04.14
  • Accepted : 2012.04.24
  • Published : 2012.04.30

Abstract

Breast MRI is the most accurate adjunctive to the mammography for the screening of breast cancer. Despite lack of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of MRI screening, it is now recommended for the women at high risk for breast cancer by the American Cancer Society and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network based on several prospective observational studies. In Korea, a retrospective study reported that preoperative MRI screening of the contralateral breast in women with unilateral breast cancer was associated with reduced metachronous cancer incidence. To introduce breast MRI as a supplemental modality to screening mammography in Korea, standardization and education of interpretation, establishment of MR-guided biopsy and adequate indication, and evaluation of cost-effectiveness and should be preceded.

유방 MRI는 유방암의 유방촬영 스크리닝법에 대한 가장 정확한 보완 검사법이다. 아직까지 MRI 스크리닝의 효과에 대한 무작위 대조군연구가 없음에도 불구하고, 현재 미국암학회와 국립 종합암네트워크 (NCCN)에서는 MRI 스크리닝을 유방암 고위험여성에서 권고하고 있다. 국내에서는, 한 후향적 연구에서 유방암 환자의 반대쪽 유방암에 대한 MRI 스크리닝법이 유방촬영술과 초음파에서 발견하지 못한 암을 발견하고 이는 이후 유방암 발병을 감소시킴을 보고하고 있다. 국내에 유방촬영 스크리닝법의 보완법으로 MRI를 도입하기 위해서는 판독의 표준화와 교육, MR 유도하 조직검사법과 적절한 적응증의 확립, 비용-효용성에 대한 평가가 선결되어야 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Gotzsche PC, Nielsen M. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;1:CD001877
  2. Otto SJ, Fracheboud J, Looman CW, et al. Initiation of population-based mammography screening in Dutch municipalities and effect on breast-cancer mortality: a systematic review. Lancet 2003;361:1411-1417
  3. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1773-1783
  4. Kuhl CK. The "coming of age" of nonmammographic screening for breast cancer. JAMA 2008;299:2203-2205
  5. Gordon PB, Goldenberg SL. Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound. Cancer 1995;76:626-630
  6. Buchberger W, Niehoff A, Obrist A, DeKoekkoek-Doll M, Dunser M. Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions: detection and classifi cation with high-resolution sonography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2000;21:325-336
  7. Kaplan SS. Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology 2001;221:641-649
  8. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that infl uence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 2002;225:165-175
  9. 육지현, 김은경. 유방초음파의 최근 동향. 대한초음파의학회지 2012;31:1-10
  10. 신희정, 김학희, 차주희. 자동유방초음파. 대한초음파의학회지 2011;30:157-162
  11. 김현성, 강봉주, 이재희 등. 7개 병원 검진센터에서 1년간 시행된 선별유방촬영술과 초음파검사의 민감도와 특이도 조사. 대한초음파의학회지 2010;29:1-5
  12. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 2008;299:2151-2163
  13. Feig SA. Current status of screening US. In: Feig SA, ed. 2005 Syllabus: categorical course in diagnostic radiology-breast imaging. Oak Brook, IL: Radiological Society of North America, 2005;143-154
  14. Berg WA, Zhang Z, Lehrer D, et al. Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA 2012;307:1394-1404
  15. Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Panizza P, et al. Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:1149-1157
  16. Warner E, Messersmith H, Causer P, Eisen A, Shumak R, Plewes D. Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 2008;148:671-679
  17. Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA, et al. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 2004; 292:1317-1325
  18. Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, et al. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 2004;351:427-437
  19. Leach MO, Boggis CR, Dixon AK, et al. Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). Lancet 2005;365:1769-1778
  20. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC, et al. Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:8469-8476
  21. Hagen AI, Kvistad KA, Maehle L, et al. Sensitivity of MRI versus conventional screening in the diagnosis of BRCA-associated breast cancer in a national prospective series. Breast 2007;16:367-374
  22. Riedl CC, Ponhold L, Flory D, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast improves detection of invasive cancer, preinvasive cancer, and premalignant lesions during surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:6144-6152
  23. Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1295-1303
  24. Sickles EA. The use of breast imaging to screen women at high risk for cancer. Radiol Clin N Am 2010;48:859-878
  25. Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57:75-89
  26. Lehman CD, Smith RA. The role of MRI in breast cancer screening. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2009;7:1109-1115
  27. Kim JY, Cho N, Moon WK, et al. Bilateral preoperative MR examinations in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients: initial and long-term impact on contralateral breast cancer diagnosis. In: Programs and abstracts of the 97th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America. Chicago,