Analysis of Sexed Sperm by Flow Cytometry in Hanwoo (Korean Native Cattle)

  • Yoo, Han-Jun (Developmental Biotechnology Laboratory, Myung-poom Hanwoo Consulting) ;
  • Lee, Kyung-Jin (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Lee, Yong-Seung (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Yoon, Pil-Sang (Developmental Biotechnology Laboratory, Myung-poom Hanwoo Consulting) ;
  • Park, Joung-Jun (Developmental Biotechnology Laboratory, Myung-poom Hanwoo Consulting) ;
  • Kim, Hyeong-Cheol (Hanwoo Experiment Station, National Livestock Research Institute) ;
  • Park, Choon-Keun (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University)
  • Received : 2012.01.19
  • Accepted : 2012.03.26
  • Published : 2012.03.31

Abstract

This study evaluated a sexed sperm ability to produce embryos by flow cytometer. Hanwoo bulls sperm were separated to X and Y sperm via Hoechst 33342 stained with near UV laser or performed the pre-sorted without near UV laser beam in flow cytometry. Pre-sorted sperm had significantly higher viability ($84{\pm}1.15%$, $p$<0.05) compared to other sorted groups in frozen-thawed semen. For fresh semen, pre-sorted sperm had the higher viability ($79{\pm}3%$, $p$<0.05) than those of the X and Y sperm ($44.7{\pm}1.67$ and $41.7{\pm}1.2%$) separated by differences of DNA content. On the other hand, pre-sorted and X sperm sorted according to differences in DNA content had significantly higher viabilities ($24.3{\pm}1.2$ and $25.7{\pm}0.9%$, $p$<0.05) compared to that of the sorted Y sperm ($13.7{\pm}1.2%$) in the hypoosmotic swelling test. The proportion acrosome reaction in the sorted X sperm was higher ($55.0{\pm}1.7$ and $45.0{\pm}1.5%$) than those of the sorted Y-sperm ($32.3{\pm}0.9%$, $p$<0.05). However, the sperm morphologies of the sorted groups were not significantly differences. In conclusion, the sex-sorting procedure by flow cytometry affected some characteristics of Hanwoo sperm. Further study is needed to determine the optimal procedures to enhance male and female embryos and sorting accuracy.

Keywords

References

  1. Blondin P, Beaulieu M, Fournier V, Morin N, Crawford L, Madan P, King WA (2009): Analysis of bovine sexed sperm for IVF from sorting to the embryo. Theriogenology 71(1):30-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.09.017
  2. Bodmer M, Janett F, Hassig M, den Daas N, Reichert P, Thun R (2005): Fertility in heifers and cows after low dose insemination with sex-sorted and nonsorted sperm under field conditions. Theriogenology 64(7):1647-1655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.04.011
  3. Buchanan BR, Seidel GE Jr, McCue PM, Schenk JL, Herickhoff LA, Squires EL (2000): Insemination of mares with low numbers of either unsexed or sexed spermatozoa. Theriogenology 53(6):1333-1344. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00276-4
  4. Buss H (2005): Improvement of the freezability of sex-sorted stallion spermatozoa. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 89:315-318.
  5. Chen MJ, Bongso A (1999): Comparative evaluation of two density gradient preparations for sperm separation for medically assisted conception. Hum Reprod 14(3):759-764. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/14.3.759
  6. Drevius LO, Eriksson H (1966): Osmotic swelling of mammalian spermatozoa. Exp Cell Res 42(1):136-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(66)90327-2
  7. Garner DL (2006): Flow cytometric sexing of mammalian sperm. Theriogenology 65(5):943-957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.09.009
  8. Hollinshead FK, Gillan L, O'Brien JK, Evans G, Maxwell WMC (2003): In vitro and in vivo assessment of functional capacity of flow cytometrically sorted ram spermatozoa after freezing and thawing. Reprod Fertil Dev 15(6):351-359. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD03060
  9. Jeyendran RS, van der Ven HH, Perez-Pelaez M, Crabo BG, Zaneveld LJ (1984): Development of an assay to assess the functional integrity of the human sperm membrane and its relationship to the other sperm characteristics. J Reprod Fertil 70(1):219-228. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0700219
  10. Johnson LA, Flook JP, Look MV (1987): Flow cytometry of X and Y chromosome-bearing sperm for DNA using an improved preparation method and staining with Hoechst 33342. Gamete Res 17(3):203-212. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1120170303
  11. Johnson LA, Flook JP, Hawk HW (1989): Sex preselection in rabbits: Live births from X and Y sperm separated by DNA and cell sorting. Biol Reprod 41(2):199-203. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod41.2.199
  12. Johnson LA (1995): Sex preselection by flow cytometric separation of X and Y chromosome-bearing sperm based on DNA difference: a review. Reprod Fertil Dev 7(4):893-903. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD9950893
  13. Johnson LA, Cran DG, Welch GR, Polge C (1996): Gender preselection in mammals. In: RH Miller, VG Pursel and HD Norman, Editors, Beltsville Symposium XX. Biotechnology's Role in the Genetic Improvement of Farm Animals, USDA, Beltsville 151-164.
  14. Johnson LA, Welch GR (1999): Sex preselection: high-speed flow cytometric sorting of X and Y sperm for maximum efficiency. Theriogenology 52(8):1323-1341. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00220-4
  15. Maxwell WMC, Johnson LA (1999): Physiology of spermatozoa at high dilution rates: the influence of seminal plasma. Theriogenology 52(8):1353-1362. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00222-8
  16. Moce E, Graham JK, Schenk JL (2006): Effect of sexsorting on the ability of fresh and cryopreserved bull sperm to undergo an acrosome reaction. Theriogenology 66(4):929-936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.01.063
  17. Moller CC, Bleil J, Kinloch RA, Wassarman PM (1990): Structural and functional relationships between mouse and hamster zona pellucid glycoproteins. Dev Biol 137(2):276-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-1606(90)90254-G
  18. Mousset-Simeon N, Rives N, Masse L, Chevallier F, Mace B (2004): Comparison of six density gradient media for selection of cryopreserved donor spermatozoa. J Androl 25(6):881-884. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.2004.tb03157.x
  19. Palma GA, Olivier NS, Neumüller Ch, Sinowatz F (2008): Effects of sex-sorted spermatozoa on the efficiency of in vitro fertilization and ultrastructure of in vitro produced bovine blastocysts. Anat Histol Embryol 37(1):67-73.
  20. Rath D, Johnson LA (2008): Application and commercialization of flow cytometrically sex-sorted semen. Reprod Domest Anim 43 Suppl 2:338-346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01182.x
  21. Samardzija M, Karadjole M, Matkovic M, Cergolj M, Getz I, Dobranic T, Tomaskovic A, Petric J, Surina J, Grizelj J, Karadjole T (2006): A comparison of BoviPure and Percoll on bull sperm separation protocols for IVF. Anim Reprod Sci 91(3-4):237-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.04.005
  22. Schenk JL, Suh TK, Cran DG, Seidel GE Jr (1999): Cryopreservation of flow-sorted bovine spermatozoa. Theriogenology 52(8):1375-1391. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00224-1
  23. Schenk JL, Seidel GE Jr (2007): Pregnancy rates in cattle with cryopreserved sexed spermatozoa: effects of laser intensity, staining conditions and catalase. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl 64:165-177.
  24. Schenk JL, Cran DG, Everett RW, Seidel GE Jr (2009): Pregnancy rates in heifers and cows with cryopreserved sexed sperm: effects of sperm numbers per inseminate, sorting pressure and sperm storage before sorting. Theriogenology 71(5):717-728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.08.016
  25. Söderlund B, Lundin K (2000): The use of silanecoated silica particles for density gradient centrifugation in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 15(4):857-860. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/15.4.857
  26. Suh TK, Schenk JL, Seidel GE Jr (2005): High pressure flow cytometric sorting damages sperm. Theriogenology. 64(5):1035-1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.02.002
  27. Thundathil J, Gil J, Januskauskas A, Larsson B, Soderquist L, Mapletoft R, Rodriguez-Martinez H (1999): Relationship between the proportion of capacitated spermatozoa present in frozen-thawed bull semen and fertility with artificial insemination. Int J Androl 22(6):366-373. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2605.1999.00194.x
  28. Underwood SL, Bathgate R, Ebsworth M, Maxwell WM, Evans G (2010): Pregnancy loss in heifers after artificial insemination with frozen-thawed, sexsorted, re-frozen-thawed dairy bull sperm. Anim Reprod Sci 118(1):7-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2009.06.004
  29. Weigel KA, Barlass KA (2003): Results of a producer survey regarding crossbreeding on US dairy farms. J Dairy Sci 86(12):4148-4154. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)74029-6