DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Design Optimization of Dental Implants Using Finite Element Analysis for Injecting Bioactive Materials

  • Lee, Kang-Soo (Xerochem Inc.) ;
  • Lee, Yong-Keun (Graduate School of NID Fusion Technology, Seoul National University of Science and Technology)
  • Received : 2012.03.29
  • Accepted : 2012.05.31
  • Published : 2012.06.27

Abstract

In order to improve osseointegration of dental implants with bone we studied an implant with holes inside its body to deliver bioactive materials based on a proposed patent. Bioactive materials can be selectively applied through holes to a patient according to diagnosis and the integration progress. After the bioactive material is applied, bone can grow into the holes to increase implant bonding and also enhance surface integration. In order to improve the concept and study the effect of bioactive material injection on implant integration, design optimization and integration research were undertaken utilizing the finite element method. A 2-dimensional simulation study showed that when bone grew into the holes after the bioactive material was injected, stress vertically distributed in the upper part of the implant was relieved and mild stress appeared at the opening of the injection holes. This confirmed the effect of the bioactive material and the contribution of the injection holes, but the maximum stress increased ten-fold at the opening. In order to reduce the maximum stress, the size, location, and the number of holes were varied and the effects were studied. When bioactive materials formed an interface layer between the implant and the mandible and four holes were filled with cortical and cancellous bones all the stress concentrated opposite to the loading side without holes disappeared. The stresses at the four outlets of the holes was mildly elevated but the maximum stress value was ten-fold greater compared to the case without the bioactive material.

Keywords

References

  1. P. I. Branemark, J. Prosthet. Dent., 50, 399 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(83)80101-2
  2. P. I. Branemark, U. Breine, R. Adell, B. O. Hansson, J. Lindstrom and A. Ohlsson, Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Hand Surg., 3, 81 (1969). https://doi.org/10.3109/02844316909036699
  3. L. A. Weinberg and B. Kruger, Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol., 78, 22 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(94)90112-0
  4. D. C. Holmes, W. R. Grigsby, V. K. Goel and J. C. Keller, Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants, 7, 450 (1992).
  5. B. Rangert, T. Jemt and L. Jorneus, Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants, 4, 241 (1989).
  6. E. J. Richter, J. Prosthet. Dent., 61, 602 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90285-0
  7. I. P. Van Rossen, L. H. Braak, C. de Putter and K. de Groot, J. Prosthet. Dent., 64, 198 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90179-G
  8. M. Quirynen, N. Van Assche, D. Botticelli and T. Berglundh, Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants, 22, 203 (2007).
  9. R. Crespi, P. Cappare, E. Gherlone and G. E. Romanos, Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants, 23, 753 (2008).
  10. R. Palmer, J. Evid. Base. Dent. Pract., 7, 8 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2006.12.001
  11. Y. M. Im, J. I. Choi, D. Khang and T. H. Nam, Kor. J. Mater. Res., 22(2), 66 (2012) (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.3740/MRSK.2012.22.2.66