Environmental Engineering Research

  • 제17권1호
  • /
  • Pages.3-8
  • /
  • 2012
  • /
  • 1226-1025(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-968X(eISSN)
대한환경공학회 (Korean Society of Environmental Engineers)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Feasibility Study on Production of Liquid Fertilizer in a 1 ㎥ Reactor Using Fishmeal Wastewater for Commercialization

  • Gwon, Byeong-Geun (Department of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Kim, Joong-Kyun (Department of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Pukyong National University)
  • 투고 : 2011.08.19
  • 심사 : 2012.02.15
  • 발행 : 2012.03.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

A scaled-up bioconversion of fishmeal wastewater (FMW) into liquid fertilizer was performed five times in a $1m^3$ reactor in order to examine the feasibility of commercialization. The importance of aeration was marked. Analyses indicated that dissolved oxygen (DO) level was closely related to the value of oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) and it was crucial to achieve high-quality liquid fertilizer. When pure oxygen was supplied through four diffusers into the reactor, DO levels and ORP values were maintained over 1.2 mg/L and 0.2 mV, respectively all the time during 52 hr of bioconversion. The pH changed from 6.8 to 5.9. The average removal percentages of chemical oxygen demand ($COD_{Cr}$) and total nitrogen (TN) were 75.0% and 71.6%, respectively. Compared to the result acquired in a 5-L reactor, bioconversion of FMW into liquid fertilizer was achieved in a shorter time under the same removal percentages of $COD_{Cr}$ and TN. The 52-hr culture of inoculated FMW was phytotoxic-free and it possessed comparable fertilizing ability to a liquid fertilizer made from the fish waste in hydroponic culture with amino acid contents of 5.93 g/ 100 g sample. From all the above results, transferring lab-scale data to large-scale production appeared to be successful. As a result, the commercialization of a liquid fertilizer made from FMW was feasible.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Faid A, Zouiten A, Elmarrakchi A, Achkari-Begdouri A. Biotransformation of fish waste into a stable feed ingredient. Food Chem. 1997;60:13-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(96)00291-9
  2. Liao PH, Jones L, Lau AK, Walkemeyer S, Egan B, Holbek N. Composting of fish wastes in a full-scale in-vessel system. Bioresour. Technol. 1997;59:163-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(96)00153-8
  3. Hassan TE, Heath JL. Biological fermentation of fish waste for potential use in animal and poultry feeds. Agric. Wastes 1986;15:1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-4607(86)90122-8
  4. Yamamoto M, Saleh F, Hayashi K. A fermentation method to dry and convert Shochu distillery by-product to a source of protein and enzymes. J. Poultry Sci. 2004;41:275-280. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.41.275
  5. Cira LA, Huerta S, Hall GM, Shirai K. Pilot scale lactic acid fermentation of shrimp wastes for chitin recovery. Process Biochem. 2002;37:1359-1366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00008-0
  6. Sachindra NM, Bhaskar N, Siddegowda GS, Sathisha AD, Suresh PV. Recovery of carotenoids from ensilaged shrimp waste. Bioresour. Technol. 2007;98:1642-1646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.05.041
  7. Gao MT, Hirata M, Toorisaka E, Hano T. Acid-hydrolysis of fish wastes for lactic acid fermentation. Bioresour. Technol. 2006;97:2414-2420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.10.002
  8. Vazquez JA, Docasal SF, Prieto MA, Gonzalez MP, Murado MA. Growth and metabolic features of lactic acid bacteria in media with hydrolysed fish viscera: an approach to bio-silage of fishing by-products. Bioresour. Technol. 2008;99:6246-6257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.12.006
  9. Xu W, Yu G, Xue C, Xue Y, Ren Y. Biochemical changes associated with fast fermentation of squid processing by-products for low salt fish sauce. Food Chem. 2008;107:1597-1604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.10.030
  10. Ockerman HW. Fishery processing technology. In: Hall GM. Fish processing technology. New York: VCH Publishers; 1992. p. 155-192.
  11. Hardy RW, Masumoto T. Specification for marine by-products for aquaculture. In: Keller S. Making profits out of seafood wastes. Alaska: University of Alaska Sea Grant; 1990. p. 109-120.
  12. Yano Y, Oikawa H, Satomi M. Reduction of lipids in fish meal prepared from fish waste by a yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008;121:302-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.11.012
  13. International Maritime Organization. International rules on dumping of wastes at sea to be strengthened with entry into force of 1996 Protocol. London: International Maritime Organization; 2006 [cited 2012 Mar 6]. Available from: http://www.imo.org/blast/mainframe.asp?topic_id=1320&doc_id=6141.
  14. Battistoni P, Fava G. Fish processing wastewater: production of internal carbon source for enhanced biological nitrogen removal. Water Sci. Technol.1995;32:293-302.
  15. Park E, Enander R, Barnett SM, Lee C. Pollution prevention and biochemical oxygen demand reduction in a squid processing facility. J. Clean. Prod. 2001;9:341-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(00)00074-3
  16. Afonso MD, Borquez R. Review of the treatment of seafood processing wastewaters and recovery of proteins therein by membrane separation processes - prospects of the ultrafiltration of wastewaters from the fish meal industry. Desalination 2002;142:29-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(01)00423-4
  17. Martin AM. A low-energy process for the conversion of fisheries waste biomass. Renew. Ener.1999;16:1102-1105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-1481(98)00428-5
  18. Kim JK, Kim JB, Cho KS, Hong YK. Isolation and identification of microorganisms and their aerobic biodegradation of fish-meal wastewater for liquid-fertilization. Int. Biodet. Biodeg. 2007;59:156-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2006.09.001
  19. Kim JK, Lee G. Aerobically biodegraded fish-meal wastewater as a fertilizer. Environ. Res. J. 2009;3:219-236.
  20. Day AD, Katterman FRH. Sewage sludge provides plant growth factors in arid environments. J. Arid Environ. 1992;23:229-233.
  21. Nhut DT, Nguyen NH, Thuy DTT. A novel in vitro hydroponic culture system for potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) microtuber production. Sci. Hortic. 2006;110:230-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2006.07.027
  22. Nhut DT, Huong NTD, Khiem DV. Direct microtuber formation and enhanced growth in the acclimatization of in vitro plantlets of taro (Colocasia esculenta spp.) using hydroponics. Sci. Hortic. 2004;101:207-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2003.10.012
  23. Resh HM. Hydroponic food production. 5th ed. Santa Barbara: Woodbridge Press Publishing; 1995. Chapter 5, Water culture.
  24. Amigun B, von Blottnitz H. Investigation of scale economics for African biogas installations. Energy Convers. Manage. 2007;48:3090-3094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2007.05.009
  25. Humphrey A. Shake flask to fermentor: what have we learned? Biotechnol. Prog. 1998;14:3-7.
  26. Dao VT, Kim JK. Scaled-up bioconversion of fish waste to liquid fertilizer using a 5 L ribbon-type reactor. J. Environ. Manage. 2011; 92:2441-2446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.05.003
  27. Zhuang RY, Huang YW, Beuchat LR. Quality changes during refrigerated storage of packed shrimp and catfish fillets treated with sodium acetate, sodium lactate or propyl gallate. J. Food Sci. 1996;61:241-244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1996.tb14769.x
  28. Wong JWC, Mak KF, Chan NW, et al. Co-composting of soybean residues and leaves in Hong Kong. Bioresour. Technol. 2001;76:99-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00103-6
  29. Kim JK, Dao VT, Kong IS, Lee HH. Identification and characterization of microorganisms from earthworm viscera for the conversion of fish wastes into liquid fertilizer. Bioresour. Technol. 2010;101:5131-5136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.001
  30. Tohyama M, Takagi S, Shimizu K. Effect of controlling lactate concentration and periodic change in DO concentration on fermentation characteristics of a mixed culture of Lactobacillus delbrueckii and Ralstonia eutropha for PHB production. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2000;89:323-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1723(00)88953-7
  31. Sakato K, Tanaka H, Shibata S, Kuratsu Y. Agitation-aeration studies on conenzyme Q10 production using Rhodopseudomonas spheroids. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 1992;16:19-28.
  32. Zhang Z, Zhu J, Park KJ. Effects of duration and intensity of aeration on solids decomposition in pig slurry for odour control. Biosyst. Eng. 2004;89:445-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2004.08.009
  33. Guo J, Yang Q, Peng Y, Yang A, Wang S. Biological nitrogen removal with real-time control using step-feed SBR technology. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2007;40:1564-1569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2006.11.001
  34. Yu RF, Liaw SL, Chang CN, Lu HJ, Cheng WY. Monitoring and control using on-line ORP on the continuous-flow activated sludge batch reactor system. Water Sci. Technol. 1997;35:57-66.
  35. Ruiz G, Jeison D, Chamy R. Development of denitrifying and methanogenic activities in USB reactors for the treatment of wastewater: effect of COD/N ratio. Process Biochem. 2006;41:1338-1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2006.01.007
  36. Bylund F, Collet E, Enfors SO, Larsson G. Substrate gradient formation in the large-scale bioreactor lower cell yield and increases by-product formation. Bioproc. Eng. 1998;18:171-180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004490050427
  37. Xu B, Jahic M, Blomsten G, Enfors SO. Glucose overflow metabolism and mixed acid fermentation in aerobic large‑scale fed‑batch processes with Escherichia coli. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1999;51:564-571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530051433
  38. Zucconi F, Monaco A, Forte M, de Bertoldi M. Phytotoxins during the stabilization of organic matter. In: Gasser JKR, ed. Composting of agricultural and other wastes. London: Elsevier Applied Science; 1985. p. 73-86.
  39. Fang M, Wong JWC. Effects of lime amendment on availability of heavy metals and maturation in sewage sludge composting. Environ. Pollut. 1999;106:83-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00056-1
  40. Maria G, Maria C, Salcedo R, de Azevedo SF. Databank transfer- of-information, shortcut and exact estimators used in the wastewater biological treatment process identification. Comp. Chem. Eng. 2000;24:1713-1718. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-1354(00)00447-6
  41. Soldal T, Nissen P. Multiphasic uptake of amino acids by barley roots. Physiol. Plantarum 1978;43:181-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1978.tb02561.x
  42. Jones DL, Darrah PR. Amino acid influx at the soil-root interface of Zea mays L. and its implications in the rhizosphere. Plant Soil 1994;163:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00033935
  43. Reeve JR, Smith JL, Carpenter-Boggs LC, Reganold JP. Soilbased cycling and differential uptake of amino acids by three species of strawberry (Fragaria spp.) plants. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2008;40:2547-2552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.06.015
  44. D'Huys PJ, Lule I, van Hove S, et al. Amino acid uptake profiling of wild type and recombinant Streptomyces lividans TK24 batch fermentations. J. Biotechnol. 2011;152:132-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.08.011

피인용 문헌

  1. The high reutilization value potential of high-salinity anchovy fishmeal wastewater through microbial degradation vol.31, pp.10, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-015-1906-2
  2. Anaerobic digestate as a nutrient medium for the growth of the green microalga Neochloris oleoabundans vol.21, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2016.005
  3. Bioremediation of different types of polluted water using microalgae vol.27, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-015-0495-1
  4. Complete reuse of raw fishmeal wastewater: Evidence from a field cultivation study and economic analysis vol.23, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2017.190
  5. Degradation Characteristics of A Novel Multi-Enzyme-Possessing Bacillus licheniformis TK3-Y Strain for the Treatment of High-Salinity Fish Wastes and Green Seaweeds vol.18, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5657/fas.2015.0349
  6. Mass transfer and flow characterization of novel algae-based nutrient removal system vol.14, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-021-01951-9