DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Physiological properties of grape cluster portions between cultivars and the effect of postharvest cooling on the marketability

포도 품종간 송이 부위별 생리적 특성과 수확 후 냉각과 유통성 관계

  • Min, Jeong-Ho (Department of Horticultural Science, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lim, Byung-Seon (Fruit Research Div., National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science, RDA) ;
  • Choi, Yeon-Soo (Department of Horticultural Science, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Kyung-Min (Department of Horticultural Science, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Dal-Woo (Department of Horticultural Science, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Hwang, Yong-Soo (Department of Horticultural Science, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Chungnam National University)
  • 민정호 (충남대학교 농업생명과학대학 원예학과) ;
  • 임병선 (국립원예특작과학원 원예작물부 과수과) ;
  • 최윤수 (충남대학교 농업생명과학대학 원예학과) ;
  • 이경민 (충남대학교 농업생명과학대학 원예학과) ;
  • 김달우 (충남대학교 농업생명과학대학 원예학과) ;
  • 황용수 (충남대학교 농업생명과학대학 원예학과)
  • Received : 2011.12.26
  • Accepted : 2012.03.23
  • Published : 2012.03.31

Abstract

Rapid loss of grape berry quality after harvest occurs due to poor postharvest management. Understanding physiological properties between cultivars is required to develop practical technologies to control fast quality deterioration of tables grapes. Physiological characteristics of whole cluster, rachis and berries were examined to find their effects on postharvest behaviour of table grapes. 'Tamnara' showed high respiration rate and browning of rachis compared to 'Campbell Early'. Weight loss of rachis of 'Cheongsoo' was highest of three cultivars. Berry decay in 'Cheongsoo' begins at the connection portion between peduncle and berry, and berry decay of 'Cheongsoo' was the most severe among three cultivars. Precooling at $0^{\circ}C$ showed better results than cooling at $10^{\circ}C$ regardless of cultivars but cooling effect decreased when simulated marketing period increased up to 10 days. Plastic film wrapping was effective on reducing decay in general but not at higher marketing temperature. For successful commercialization of newly developed grapes, the inhibition technology of rachis browning in 'Tamnara' is required and decay control in 'Cheongsoo' through establishment of cold chain system is recommended.

Keywords

References

  1. Costa C, Lucera A, Conte A, Mastromatteo M, Speranza B, Antonacci A, del Nobile MA. 2011. Effects of passive and active modified atmosphere packaging conditions on ready-to-eat table grape. Journal of Food Engineering 102: 115-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.08.001
  2. Martinez-Tellez MA, Baez M, Sanchez A, Baez R, Siller JH, Gonzalez G, Gardea AA. 1994. Post-harvest weight loss of flame seedless clusters. pp. 203-206. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Table Grape Production. June 28-29, Anaheim, California.
  3. Gardea AA, Carvallo T, Sastre B, Marttinez-Tellez MA, Yepiz- Plascencia GM, Diaz-Cinco M, Orozco JA. 2004. Table grape postharvest management and safety issues. (In) Dris R, Jain SM (Eds.). Production Practices and Quality Assessment of Food Crops. Vol. III. Quality Handling and Evaluation. pp. 307-320. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Netherlands.
  4. Jang S, Lee SK. 2009. Current research status of postharvest technology of grape. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 27: 511-520.
  5. Park KS, Jeong SB, Yun HK, Lee YS, Kim HR. 2002. Selection of grape cultivars in 21st century. pp. 69, 71. National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science.
  6. Lichter A, Kaplunov T, Zutahy Y, Daus A, Alchanatis V, Ostrovsky V, Lurie S. 2011. Physical and visual properties of grape rachis as affected by water vapor pressure deficit. Postharvest Biology and Technology 59: 25-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2010.07.009
  7. Luvis DA, Shorey HH, Thompson JL, Gump BH, Knutson J. Unknown. Sulfur dioxide fumigation of table grapes. pp. 3-6. Bulletin 1932. University of California.
  8. Martinez-Romero D, Guillen F, Castillo S, Valero D, Serrano M. 2003. Modified atmosphere packaging maintains quality of table grapes. J. of Food Science 68: 1838-1843. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2003.tb12339.x
  9. Nelson KE. 1985. Harvesting and handling California table grapes for market. pp. 4-7. 1913. Agricultural Experiment Station. University of California.
  10. Paulo L, Crisosto CH, Garner D, Basinal LM, Smilanick JL, Zoffoli ZP. 2001. Minimum constant sulfur dioxide emission rate to control gray mold of cold stored table grapes. Central Valley Postharvest Newsletter 10: 2. Cooperative Extension. University of California.
  11. Sandhya. 2010. Modified atmosphere packaging of fresh produce: Current status and future needs. LWT-Food Science and Technology 43: 381-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2009.05.018
  12. Yang YJ, Hwang YS, Park YM. 2007. Modified atmosphere packaging extends freshness of grapes 'Campbell Early' and 'Kyoho'. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 25: 138-144.
  13. Zoffoli JP, Latorre BA, Naranjo P. 2008. Hairline, a postharvest cracking disorder in table grapes induced by sulfur dioxide. Postharvest Biology and Technology 47: 90-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2007.06.013