DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of CQ-amine ratio on the degree of conversion in resin monomers with binary and ternary photoinitiation systems

  • Moon, Ho-Jin (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Dankook University College of Dentistry and Institute of Dental Science) ;
  • Shin, Dong-Hoon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Dankook University College of Dentistry and Institute of Dental Science)
  • Received : 2012.03.27
  • Accepted : 2012.04.12
  • Published : 2012.06.01

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluated the effect of camphorquinone (CQ)-amine ratio on the C=C double bond conversion of resins with binary and ternary photoinitiation systems. Materials and Methods: Two monomer mixtures (37.5 Bis-GMA/37.5 Bis- EMA/25 TEGDMA) with binary systems (CQ/DMAEMA in weight ratio, group A [0.5/1.0] and B [1.0/0.5]) and four mixtures with ternary system (CQ/OPPI/DMAEMA, group C [0.1/1.0/0.1], D [0.1/1.0/ 0.2], E [0.2/1.0/0.1] and F [0.2/1.0/0.2]) were tested: 1 : 2 or 2 : 1 CQ-amine ratio in binary system, while 1 : 1 ratio was added in ternary system. The monomer mixture was cured for 5, 20, 40, and 300 sec with a Demetron 400 curing unit (Demetron). After each exposure time, degree of conversion (DC) was estimated using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrophotometer (Nicolet 520, Nicolet Instrument Corp.). The results were analyzed by ANOVA followed by Scheffe test, with p = 0.05 as the level of significance. Results: DC (%) was expressed in the order of curing time (5, 20, 40, and 300 sec). Group A ($14.63{\pm}10.42$, $25.23{\pm}6.32$, $51.62{\pm}2.69$, $68.52{\pm}2.77$); Group B ($4.04{\pm}6.23$, $16.56{\pm}3.38$, $37.95{\pm}2.79$, $64.48{\pm}1.21$); Group C ($16.87{\pm}5.72$, $55.47{\pm}2.75$, $60.83{\pm}2.07$, $68.32{\pm}3.31$); Group D ($23.77{\pm}1.64$, $61.05{\pm}1.82$, $65.13{\pm}2.09$, $71.87{\pm}1.17$); Group E ($28.66{\pm}2.92$, $56.68{\pm}1.33$, $60.66{\pm}1.17$, $68.78{\pm}1.30$); Group F ($39.74{\pm}6.31$, $61.07{\pm}2.58$, $64.22{\pm}2.29$, $69.94{\pm}2.15$). Conclusion: All the monomers with ternary photoinitiation system showed higher DC than the ones with binary system, until 40 sec. Concerning about the effect of CQ-amine ratio on the DC, group A converted into polymer more than group B in binary system. However, there was no significant difference among groups with ternary system, except group C when cured for 5 sec only.

Keywords

References

  1. Ferracane JL, Greener EH. The effect of resin formulation on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of dental restorative resins. J Biomed Mater Res 1986;20:121-131.
  2. Wataha JC, Hanks CT, Strawn SE, Fat JC. Cytotoxicity of components of resins and other dental restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 1994;21:453-462.
  3. Imazato S, Tarumi H, Kobayashi K, Hiraguri H, Oda K, Tsuchitani Y. Relationship between the degree of conversion and internal discoloration of light-activated composite. Dent Mater J 1995;14:23-30.
  4. Liu VA, Bhatia SN. Three-dimensional photopatterning of hydrogels containing living cells. Biomed Microdev 2002;4: 257-266.
  5. Fisher JP, Dean D, Mikos AG. Photocrosslinking characteristics and mechanical properties of diethyl fumarate/poly (propylene fumarate) biomaterials. Biomaterials 2002;23:4333-4343.
  6. Dart EC, Nemcek J. Photopolymerisable composition. Great Britain Patent Specification No. 1408265 (1971); Japanese Patent No. Toku-Kou-Sho 54-10986 (1979).
  7. Tsai L, Charney E. The triplet states of alpha-dicarbonyls. Camphorquinone. J Phys Chem 1969;73:2462-2463.
  8. Stansbury JW. Curing dental resins and composites by photopolymerization. J Esthet Dent 2000;12:300-308.
  9. Jakubiak J, Allonas X, Fouassier JP, Sionkowska A, Andrzejewska E, Linden LA, Rabek JF. Camphorquinone-amines photoinitating systems for the initiation of free radical polymerization. Polymer 2003;44:5219-5226.
  10. Davidenko N, Garcia O, Sastre R. Photopolymerization kinetics of dimethacrylate-based light-cured dental resins. J Appl Polym Sci 2005;97:1016-1023.
  11. Yoshida K, Greener EH. Effects of two amine reducing agents on the degree of conversion and physical properties of an unfilled light-cured resin. Dent Mater 1993;9:246-251.
  12. Schneider LF, Cavalcante LM, Consani S, Ferracane JL. Effect of co-initiator ratio on the polymer properties of experimental resin composites formulated with camphorquinone and phenyl-propanedione. Dent Mater 2009;25:369-375.
  13. Musanje L, Ferracane JL, Sakaguchi RL. Determination of the optimal photoinitiator concentration in dental composites based on essential material properties. Dent Mater 2009;25:994-1000.
  14. Moszner N, Fischer UK, Ganster B, Liska R, Rheinberger V. Benzoyl germanium derivatives as novel visible light photoinitiators for dental materials. Dent Mater 2008;24: 901-907.
  15. Rueggeberg FA, Ergle JW, Lockwood PE. Effect of photoinitiator level on properties of a light-cured and post-cure heated model resin system. Dent Mater 1997;13:360-364.
  16. Park YJ, Chae KH, Rawls HR. Development of a new photoinitiation system for dental light-cure composite resins. Dent Mater 1999;15:120-127.
  17. Fujisawa S, Kadoma Y, Masuhara E. Effects of photoinitiators for the visible-light resin system on hemolysis of dog erythrocytes and lipid peroxidation of their components. J Dent Res 1986;65:1186-1190.
  18. Sun GJ, Chae KH. Properties of 2,3-butanedione and 1-phenyl- 1,2-propanedione as new photosensitizers for visible light cured dental resin composites. Polymer 2000;41:6205-6212.
  19. Jakubiak J, Wrzyszczy ski A, Lindén LÅ, Rabek JF. The role of amines in the camphorquinone photoinitiated polymerization of multifunctional monomer. J Macromol Sci A 2007;44:239- 242.
  20. Davidenko N, Garcia O, Sastre R. Photopolymerization kinetics of dimethacrylate-based light-cured dental resins. J Appl Polym Sci 2005;97:1016-1023.
  21. Jakubiak J, Sionkowska A, Linden LA, Rabek JF. Isothermal photo differential scanning calorimetry: crosslinking polymerization of multifunctional monomers in presence of visible light photoinitiators. J Therm Anal Calor 2001;65:435-443.
  22. Bowen RL, Argentar H. Tertiary aromatic amine accelerators with molecular weights above 400. J Dent Res 1972;51:473- 482.
  23. Ogunyinka A, Palin WM, Shortall AC, Marquis PM. Photoinitiation chemistry affects light transmission and degree of conversion of curing experimental dental resin composites. Dent Mater 2007;23:807-813.
  24. Cohen SG, Chao HM. Photoreduction of aromatic ketones by amine. Studies of quantum yields and mechanism. J Am Chem Soc 1968;90:165-173.
  25. Antonucci JM, Venz S. Tertiary amine salts and complexes as chemical and photochemical accelerators. J Dent Res 1987; 66:Abstract #170, p128.
  26. Tanoue N, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. The influence of ultraviolet radiation intensity on curing depth of photoactivated composite veneering materials. J Oral Rehab 1998;25:770-775.
  27. Allen NS. Photoinitiators for UV and visible curing of coatings: mechanism and properties. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 1996;100:101-107.
  28. Shin DH, Rawls HR. Degree of conversion and color stability of the light curing resin with new photoinitiator systems. Dent Mater 2009;25:1030-1038.
  29. De Raaff AM, Marino TL, Neckers DC. Optimized cure efficiency using a fluorone visible light photoinitiator and a novel charge transfer: complex initiating system. In: RAI/TECH Conference. 1996.
  30. He JH, Mendoza VS. Synthesis and study of a novel hybrid UV photoinitiator: p-benzoyldiphenyliodonium hexafluorophosphate (PhCOPhl + PhPF). J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem 1996;34:2809-2816.
  31. Kim CG, Moon HJ, Shin DH. Optimal combination of 3-component photoinitiation system to increase the degree of conversion of resin monomers. J Korean Acad Cons Dent 2011;36: 313-323.
  32. Vallo CI. Flexural strength distribution of a PMMA-based bone cement. : J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 2002;63: 226-236.
  33. Park J, Ye Q, Topp EM, Misra A, Kieweg SL, Spencer P. Effect of photoinitiator system and water content on dynamic mechanical properties of a light-cured bisGMA/HEMA dental resin. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010;93:1245-1251.
  34. Brandt WC, Schneider LF, Frollini E, Correr-Sobrinho L, Sinhoreti MA. Effect of different photo-initiators and light curing units on degree of conversion of composites. Braz Oral Res 2010;24:263-270.
  35. Cook WD. Photopolymerization kinetics of dimethacrylates using the camphorquinone/amine initiator system. Polymer 1992;33:600-609.
  36. Guo X, Wang Y, Spencer P, Ye Q, Yao X. Effects of water content and initiator composition on photopolymerization of a model BisGMA/HEMA resin. Dent Mater 2008;24:824-831.
  37. Padon KS, Scranton AB. A mechanistic investigation of a three-component radical photoinitiator system comprising methylene blue, n-methyldiethanolamine, and diphenyliodonium chloride. J Polym Sci A Polym Chem 2000;38:2057-2066.
  38. Moin Jan C, Nomura Y, Urabe H, Okazaki M, Shintani H. The relationship between leachability of polymerization initiator and degree of conversion of visible light-cured resin. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 2001;58: 42-46.

Cited by

  1. 1,3-Butadiene as an Adhesion Promoter Between Composite Resin and Dental Ceramic in a Dielectric Barrier Discharge Jet vol.33, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-013-9437-9
  2. )-catalyzed azide–alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) polymerizations vol.7, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1039/C5PY01655J
  3. Long-term bonding efficacy of adhesives containing benzodioxioles as alternative co-initiators vol.32, pp.0, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0104