DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The classification of biotope type and characteristics of naturalized plant habitat on the coastal sand dune ecosystem

  • Received : 2011.08.29
  • Accepted : 2012.06.01
  • Published : 2012.09.01

Abstract

Coastal sand dune systems are particularly fragile and threaten the environment. However, these systems provide fundamental ecosystem services to the nearby urban areas, acting, for example, as protective buffers against erosion. In this paper, we attempt to classify the biotope types of coastal sand dune ecosystems and select an index for the assessment of the conservation value. The types of biotopes are categorized based on the vegetation map; floras are examined in order to research the effects of hinterlands on coastal sand dunes. In addition, a naturalization rate and an urbanization index for each biotope type in hinterlands are analyzed. In the ecosystem of coastal sand dunes, the urbanization index and naturalization rate shows a higher value in sand dunes with areas of road, residential, and idle land in farm villages, rice fields, and fields. On the contrary, a lower value in the urbanization index and naturalization rate is present when typical biotope types, such as sand dune vegetation and natural Pinus thunbergii forests, are widely distributed. Based on these results, urbanization index and naturalization rate should be used as critical indices for the assessment of the ecosystem of costal sand dunes.

Keywords

References

  1. An KG, Yeom DH, Lee SK. 2001. Rapid bioassessments of Kap stream using the index of biological integrity. Korean J Environ Biol 19: 261-269.
  2. Blab J. 1993. Grundlagen des Biotopschutzes fur Tiere, 4. Nuebearbeitete und erweiterte Auflage. Schriftenreihe für Landschaftspflege und Naturschutz Heft 24: 479.
  3. Carboni M, Carranza ML, Acosta A. 2009. Assessing conservation status on coastal dunes: a multiscale approach. Landsc Urban Plan 91: 17-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.11.004
  4. Carter RWG. 1988. Coastal Environments: An Introduction to the Physical, Ecological and Cultural Systems of Coastlines. Academic Press, London, pp 301-332.
  5. Choi IK, Oh CH, Ahn GY, Lee EH. 2009. The suggestion for evaluation items and system for assessment of biotope. Korean J Environ Ecol 23: 594-602.
  6. Choi IK, Oh CH, Lee EH. 2008. The suggestion for classification of biotope type for nationwide application. Korean J Environ Ecol 22: 666-678.
  7. Dahl F. 1908. Grundsaetze und grundbegriffe der biocoenotischen forshung. Zool Anz 33: 349-353.
  8. Ducrotoy JP. 2010. The use of biotopes in assessing the environmental quality of tidal estuaries in Europe. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 86: 317-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2009.05.023
  9. Kim CS, Ihm BS. 1988. Studies on the vegetation of the salt marsh in the southwestern coast of Korea. Korean J Ecol 11: 175-192.
  10. Kim CS, Jeong YS, Oh JK. 1987. Studies on the flora and vegetation of Ui-do. Bull Inst Littoral Biota 4: 1-47.
  11. Kim JM, Yim YJ, Cheon ES. 2000. The Naturalized Plants in Korea. Science Books, Seoul.
  12. Kim SH, Seo JC, Park K. 2008. The classification of coastal dune wetlands in the Shindu dunefield based on their topographic and hydrologic characteristics. J Korea Geomorphol Assoc 15: 107-118.
  13. Leser H. 1991. Landschaftsokologie. Ansatz, Modelle, Methodik, Anwendung. 3. Auflage (UTB 521). Ulmer, Stuttgart.
  14. Ministry of Environment. 2001. The Study of the Status Conservation and Management of Sand Dunes in Korea: List of Korean Sand Dunes. Ministry of Environment, Seoul.
  15. Oh HK. 2009. Evaluation analysis attribute and classification type of vegetation biotope: a case study on the Jeollabukdo. PhD Dissertation. Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Korea.
  16. Park SH. 1995. Colored Illustrations of Naturalized Plants of Korea. Ilchokak, Seoul.
  17. Park SH. 2001. Colored Illustrations of Naturalized Plants of Korea (Appendix). Ilchokak, Seoul.
  18. Seo JC. 2008. Development of index and criteria for assesscies ment of sand dune ecological value. Annual Meeting of the Korean Geographical Society, 2008 Oct 23-24, Daejeon, pp 68-69.
  19. van der Maarel E. 2003. Some remarks on the functions of European coastal ecosystems. Phytocoenologia 33: 187-202. https://doi.org/10.1127/0340-269X/2003/0033-0187
  20. Walker S, Wilson JB, Steel JB, Rapson GL, Smith B, King WM, Cottam YH. 2003. Properties of ecotones: evidence from five ecotones objectively determined from a coastal vegetation gradient. J Veg Sci 14: 579-590. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02185.x