DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

품종과 건조방법에 따른 고춧가루의 집단 특성

Bulk Properties of Red Pepper Powder by Drying Method and Variety

  • 강유리 (충북대학교 식품공학과) ;
  • 이상훈 (충북대학교 식품공학과) ;
  • 김현영 (국립식량과학원 기능성잡곡과) ;
  • 우관식 (국립식량과학원 기능성잡곡과) ;
  • 황인국 (국립농업과학원 전통한식과) ;
  • 황영 (국립농업과학원 전통한식과) ;
  • 유선미 (국립농업과학원 전통한식과) ;
  • 김행란 (국립농업과학원 전통한식과) ;
  • 김혜영 (용인대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 이준수 (충북대학교 식품공학과) ;
  • 정헌상 (충북대학교 식품공학과)
  • Kang, Yu-Ri (Dept. of Food Science and Technology, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Hoon (Dept. of Food Science and Technology, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Hyun-Young (Dept. of Functional Crop, National Institute of Crop Science) ;
  • Woo, Koan-Sik (Dept. of Functional Crop, National Institute of Crop Science) ;
  • Hwang, In-Guk (Dept. of Agro-food Resources, National Academy of Agricultural Science) ;
  • Hwang, Young (Dept. of Agro-food Resources, National Academy of Agricultural Science) ;
  • Yoo, Seon-Mi (Dept. of Agro-food Resources, National Academy of Agricultural Science) ;
  • Kim, Haeng-Ran (Dept. of Agro-food Resources, National Academy of Agricultural Science) ;
  • Kim, Hae-Young (Dept. of Food Science and Nutrition, Yongin University) ;
  • Lee, Jun-Soo (Dept. of Food Science and Technology, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Jeong, Heon-Sang (Dept. of Food Science and Technology, Chungbuk National University)
  • 투고 : 2012.05.29
  • 심사 : 2012.07.29
  • 발행 : 2012.09.30

초록

건조방법에 따른 품종별 고춧가루의 물리적 특성을 알아보기 위하여 집단밀도, 압축특성, 쌓임각, 비회복성 일 및 응력이완 특성을 살펴보았다. 이완집단밀도는 0.4197~0.4274$g/cm^3$ 범위로 열풍건조 한반도품종이 큰 밀도를, 청양품종열풍건조가 작은 밀도를 나타내었다. 충격집단밀도는 0.523~0.586 $g/cm^3$ 범위로 원적외선건조 한반도 품종이 큰 밀도를 나타내었고 한반도품종 천일건조가 0.523 $g/cm^3$로 작았다. 하우스너 비는 1.225~1.370의 범위를 보였으며, 두 품종모두 원적외선 건조에서 큰 값을 나타내었다. 압축성은0.00157~0.00225 범위로 한반도품종 원적외선건조가 큰 압축성을 나타내었다. 압축비는 0.971~1.032의 범위로 열풍건조가 크게 나타났으며, 품종에 따라서는 한반도품종이 큰값을 나타내었다. 안식각은 37.47{\sim}$42.38^{\circ}$ 범위로 열풍건조가 큰 값을 나타내었으며, 비회복성 일은 76.0~81.7%의 범위로 건조방법에 따른 차이는 작았지만 한반도품종이 청양품종에 비해 큰 값을 보였다. $k_2$값은 1.20~1.24 범위로 건조방법 및 품종 간 차이는 작았으며, 이완성은 13.41~24.31%범위로 원적외선 건조가 큰 값을 보였고 건조 방법별로 청양품종이 큰 값을 나타내었다.

This study investigated the bulk properties of red pepper powders according to drying method and variety. Bulk density, compressive characteristics, irrecoverable work, dynamic angle, and stress relaxation were investigated. Loose bulk density ranged between 0.420 $g/cm^3$ for Cheongyang cultivar and 0.427 $g/cm^3$ for Hanbando cultivar by hot-air drying. The highest tapped bulk density was 0.586 $g/cm^3$ for Hanbando cultivar by far-infrared drying and the lowest value was 0.523 $g/cm^3$ for Hanbando cultivar by sun drying. Hausner ratio reached a maximum value of 1.370 for Hanbando cultivar by far-infrared drying. Compressibility ranged between 0.0016 for Cheongyang cultivar by sun drying and 0.0023 for Hanbando cultivar by far-infrared drying. Compression ratio reached a maximum value of 1.032 for Hanbando cultivar by hot-air drying. Dynamic angle of repose ranged between 37.47 and $42.97^{\circ}$. Irrecoverable work ranged between 76.0 and 81.7%. Relaxation reached a maximum value of 24.31% for Cheongyang cultivar by far-infrared drying.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Chang KS. 1995. Prediction of flow properties in model food powders. KOSEF: 931-0600-024-2. Seoul, Korea. p 1-37.
  2. Song JC, Park HJ. 1995. Food rheology. 3th ed. Koo Bonho Publisher, Ulsan, Korea. p 63-79.
  3. Mohsenin N. 1970. Physical properties of plant and animal materials. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York, NY, USA. p 556-560.
  4. Peleg M, Moreyra R, Scovile E. 1982. Rheological characteristics of food powders. AIChE Symp Series 78: 138-143.
  5. Teunou E, Fitzpatrick JJ, Synnott EC. 1999. Characterization of food powder flowability. J Food Eng 39: 31-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(98)00140-X
  6. Jeong HS, Min YK, Toledo RT. 2002. Physical characteristics of rice flour puffed by carbon dioxide. Food Eng Prog 6: 152-157.
  7. Hollenbachi AM, Peleg M, Rufner R. 1982. Effect of four anticaking agents on the bulk characteristics of ground sugar. J Food Sci 47: 538-544. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1982.tb10119.x
  8. Barbosa-Canovas GV, Rufner R, Peleg M. 1985. Microstructure of selected binary food powder mixtures. J Food Sci 50: 473-477.
  9. Teunou E, Fitzpatrick JJ. 2000. Effect of storage time and consolidation on food powder flowability. J Food Eng 43: 97-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(99)00137-5
  10. Moreyra R, Yeleg M. 1980. Compressive deformation patterns of selected food powders. J Food Sci 45: 864-868.
  11. Scoville E, Peleg M. 1981. Evaluation of the effects of liquid bridges on the bulk properties of model powders. J Food Sci 46: 174-177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1981.tb14557.x
  12. Peleg M, Mannheim CH, Passy N. 1973. Flow properties of some food powders. J Food Sci 38: 959-964. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1973.tb02124.x
  13. Juliano P, Muhunthan B, Barbosa-Canovas GV. 2006. Flow and shear descriptors of preconsolidated food powders. J Food Eng 72: 157-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.11.032
  14. Oh SH, Hwang IG, Kim HY, Hwang CR, Park SM, Hwang Y, Yoo SM, Kim HR, Kim HY, Lee JS, Jeong HS. 2011. Quality characteristics by particle size of red pepper powders for pepper paste and Kimchi. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 40: 725-730. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2011.40.5.725
  15. Oh SH. 2011. Physical properties related to particle size of red pepper powder and its quality characteristics during storage. MS Thesis. Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea.
  16. Malave J, Barbosa-Canovas GV, Peleg M. 1985. Comparison of the compaction characteristics of selected food powders by vibration, tapping and mechanical compression. J Food Sci 50: 1473-1476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1985.tb10502.x
  17. Peleg M. 1982. Physical characteristics of food powders. In Physical Properties of Foods. Peleg M, Bagley EB, eds. AVI Publishing Co., Inc., Westport, CT, USA. p 293.
  18. Peleg M. 1979. Characterization of the stress relaxation curves of solid foods. J Food Sci 44: 227-281.
  19. Peleg M. 1980. Linearization of relaxation and creep curves of solid biological materials. J Rheol 24: 451-463. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.549567
  20. Park SJ, Kim MH, Shin HM. 2005. Physical properties of rice husk. J Biosystems Eng 30: 229-234. https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2005.30.4.229
  21. Shin HK, Hwang SH, Yoon KS. 2003. Absorption characteristics and prediction model of ginger powder by different drying methods. Korean J Food Sci Technol 35: 211-216.
  22. Patel R, Podczeck F. 1996. Investigation of the effect of type and source of microcrystalline cellulose on capsule filling. Int J Pharm 128: 123-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5173(95)04231-8
  23. Koh HK, Cho JB, Park JB, Kim YH, Kang SW. 1989. Efficient utilization of energy in drying process for rewetted red pepper-Hot-air-convective and infrared-radiant drying-. Journal of the Korean Society for Agricultural Machinery 14: 262-271.
  24. Yoon WM, Lee JY. 2004. Effect of drying method on the quality of red pepper (Capsicum annuum var. longum). J Natural Sci Pai Chai University Korea 14: 139-149.
  25. Lee MJ. 2007. Modeling drying and absorption characteristics of Chaga mushroom powder as influenced by different drying methods. MS Thesis. Daegu University of Gyeongbuk, Korea.

피인용 문헌

  1. Quality Characteristics of Red Pepper Cultivars according to Cultivation Years and Regions vol.27, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2014.27.5.817
  2. 스팀 가열 및 자외선, 감마선 조사 처리에 따른 고춧가루의 미생물 저감화 효과 vol.52, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.9721/kjfst.2020.52.2.177
  3. Physicochemical, functional, oxidative stability and rheological properties of red pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) powder and paste vol.24, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2021.1969945