DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Changes in SNR and ADC According to the Increase in b Value in Liver Diffusion-Weighted Images

  • Cho, Jae-Hwan (Department of International Radiological Science, Hallym University of Graduate Studies) ;
  • Kim, Ham-Gyum (Department of Radiological Technology, Ansan College)
  • Received : 2012.05.17
  • Accepted : 2012.06.11
  • Published : 2012.09.30

Abstract

In the present study, changes in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the diffusion-weighted images in the normal livers were investigated using changes in b values in 1.5 T MR (magnetic resonance) instruments. Respective diffusion-weighted images and ADC map images were obtained from 20 healthy individuals by increasing b values from 50 to 400 and 800 $s/mm^2$ using 1.5T MR scanner between January 2011 and November 2011. At each ADC map image obtained at each b value, ADCs in the right hepatic lobe, spleen and kidney were measured. As a result, ADCs of the right hepatic lobe, spleen and kidney have gradually decreased in the diffusion-weighted images in accordance with the reduced b value. This outcome may be used as preliminary data for applications to various abdominal diseases.

Keywords

References

  1. C. J. Fretz, D. D. Stark, C. E. Metz, G. Elizondo, R. Weissleder, J. H. Shen, J. Wittenberg, J. Simeone, and J. T. Ferrucci, Am. J. Roentgenol. 155, 763 (1990). https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.155.4.2119106
  2. K. D. Hagspiel, K. F. Neidl, A. C. Eichenberger, W. Weder, and B. Marincek, Radiology 196, 471 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.196.2.7617863
  3. M. Strotzer, J. Gmeinwieser, J. Schmidt, C. Fellner, J. Seitz, H. Albrich, H. Zirngibl, and S. Feuerbach, Acta Radiol. 38, 986 (1997).
  4. D. Le Bihan, E. Breton, D. Lallemand, M. L. Aubin, J. Vignaud, and M. Laval-Jeantet, Radiology 168, 497 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.168.2.3393671
  5. H. C. Thoeny and F. De Keyzer, Eur. Radiol. 17, 1385 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0547-0
  6. D. M. Koh and D. J. Collins, Am. J. Roentgenol. 188, 1622 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.06.1403
  7. J. H. Lee, C. H. Sohn, and J. S. Choi, J. Korean Radiol. Soc. 49, 455 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3348/jkrs.2003.49.6.455
  8. D. Chien, K. K. Kwong, D. R. Gress, F. S. Buonanno, R. B. Buxton, and B. R. Rosen, AJNR 13, 1097 (1992).
  9. J. E. Sarlls, "High-resolution diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: Development and application of novel radial fast spin-echo acquisitions", Ph. D. Thesis, The University of Arizona 3215376 (2006).
  10. A. Einstein, Investigations on the Theory of Brownian Motion. Dover, New York (1926).
  11. E. O. Stejskal and J. E. Tanner, J. Chem. Phys. 42, 288 (1965).
  12. S. Warach, J. Gaa, B. Siewert, P. Wielopolski, and R. R. Edelman, Ann. Neurol. 37, 231 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410370214
  13. B. Taouli and D. M. Koh, Radiology 254, 47 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.09090021
  14. M. C. DeLano, T. G. Cooper, J. E. Siebert, M. J. Potchen, and K. Kuppusamy, Am. J. Neuroradiol. 21, 1830 (2000).
  15. J. H. Burdette, D. D. Durden, A. D. Elster, and Y. F. Yen, J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 25, 515 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-200107000-00002
  16. T. Namimoto, Y. Yamashita, S. Sumi, Y. Tang, and M. Takahashi, Radiology 204, 739 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.204.3.9280252
  17. T. Kim, T. Murakami, S. Takahashi, M. Hori, K. Tsuda, and H. Nakamura, Am. J. Roentgenol. 173, 393 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.173.2.10430143
  18. T. Bachir, V. Valerie, D. Erik, D. Jean-Luc, F. Bo, and M. Yves, Radiology 226, 71 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2261011904
  19. C. A. Clark and L. B. Denis, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 44, 852 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2594(200012)44:6<852::AID-MRM5>3.0.CO;2-A

Cited by

  1. A comparative quantitative analysis of magnetic susceptibility artifacts in echo planar and PROPELLER diffusion-weighted images vol.62, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.62.358
  2. Correlations between the MR Diffusion-weighted Image (DWI) and the bone mineral density (BMD) as a function of the soft tissue thickness-focus on phantom and patient vol.62, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.62.684