Journal of the Korean earth science society (한국지구과학회지)

The Korean Earth Science Society (한국지구과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Ways to Incorporate Key Competencies in the Science Curriculum

  • Received : 2012.07.04
  • Accepted : 2012.09.03
  • Published : 2012.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study explored ways to implement a competencies-based curriculum in schools by reviewing exemplary cases that have introduced Key Competencies (KCs) in the school science curriculum. Since the OECD redefined key competencies as 'what people should know and do in order to lead a successful life in a well-functioning society', many countries have emphasized the use of a competencies-based curriculum. Foreign and domestic classroom cases, which have used a competencies-based curriculum in science teaching, were collected and analyzed. Through open-ended interviews with teachers and principals, we investigated changes of teachers' professional knowledge and practice that were evident as a result of the implementation of competencies-based curriculum in science class. Foreign science teachers suggested ways to relate competencies-based curriculum and science curriculum including maintaining a balance between competencies-based curriculum and content-based curriculum. They also integrated KCs into all subject-based curriculums, gave priority to KCs over subject matter knowledge, and developed KCs through teaching science contents that students wanted to learn. On the other hand, Korean science teachers suggested reconstructing competencies-based curriculum by extracting common attributes from the existing subject areas. They also made KCs realized through content teaching, and developed various KCs within science contexts. Implications of the competencies-based curriculum for science teaching and learning were discussed at the end.

Keywords

References

  1. Boyd, S. and Watson, V., 2006, Shifting the frame: Exploring integration of the Key Competencies at six normal schools. New Zealand Council for Education Research, 165 p.
  2. Choi, Y., Yoo, T., Moon, D., Choi, J., and Kang, K., 2009, A study on the model restructure of practical arts curriculum to develop Korean's key competencies in the future. KICE, RRC 2009-10-1, 354 p.
  3. Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R.C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., and Orphanos, S., 2009, Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. National Staff Development Council and the School Redesign Network at Stanford University, CA, USA, 162 p.
  4. Fullan, M. and Hargreaves, A., 2002, Teacher development and educational change. Routledge, NY, USA, 264 p.
  5. Gess-Newsome, J., and Lederman, N.G. (eds.), 1999, Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Berlin, GHA, 320 p.
  6. Hong, W., Lee, G., and Lee, E., 2010, Exploring How to Implement Competence-based Curriculum in Korean Schools: Based on Foreign Cases. KICE, RRC 2010-2, 175 p.
  7. KICE, 2009, Research on mentoring system to improve teaching professionalism - centering on Korean language, social studies and science subject. KICE, 2009-7. 348 p.
  8. Lee, K., Jeon, J., Huh, K., Hong, W., and Kim, M., 2009, Redesigning Elementary and Secondary School Curriculum for Developing Future Koreans' Core Competences. KICE, RRC 2009-10-1, 364 p
  9. Luke, A. and McArdle, F., 2009, A model for researchbased state professional development policy. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 37, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598660802616401
  10. MEST, 2011, Elementary and secondary school national curriculum: Introduction. MEST, Document 2011-361, 31 p.
  11. National Research Council (NRC), 2007, Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching: Science in Grades K-8. National Academy Press, WA, USA, 348 p.
  12. Niemi, H., 2005, Future challenges for education and learning outcomes. Wingspan, 1, 5-12.
  13. OECD, 2003, Definition and selection of competencies: Theoretical and conceptual foundation. Hogrefe and Huber, WA, USA, 224 p.
  14. OECD, 2006, Schooling for tomorrow: Think scenarios, rethink education. OECD, Paris, FRA, 200 p.
  15. Park, S., Baek, K., Han, H., and Kim, D., 2010, A study on the issues in organizing and implementing the 2009 revised national middle school curriculum. KICE, RRC 2010-21-2, 186 p.
  16. Park, Y., 2010, Secondary beginning teachers' views of scientific inquiry: With the view of hands-on, minds-on, and hearts-on, Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 31, 798-812. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2010.31.7.798
  17. So, K., Lee, S., and Lee, J., H.H., 2010, Review on curriculum reform in the New Zealand: Implementation of key competencies-based curriculum. Korean Journal of Comparative Education, 20, 27-50.
  18. Van Esa, E.A., and Sherinb, M.G., 2008, Mathematics teachers' "learning to notice" in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 244-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.005
  19. Wenger, E., 1998, Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 336 p.
  20. Yoon, H., Kim, Y., Lee, K., and Jeon, J., 2007, A study on developing a key competence in the primary/ secondary school curriculum for the future of Koreans. KICE, RRC 2007-1, 211 p.