Reliability Analysis on the Assessment Indicators for Senior Walking Environment

노인 보행환경 평가항목 신뢰도 분석연구

  • Received : 2012.03.21
  • Accepted : 2012.06.19
  • Published : 2012.06.30

Abstract

Developing reliable measures of the environment is important to increase our understanding of the environmental effects on walking among seniors. As a preliminary study for developing an instrument for measuring walkability of seniors' environment, the purpose of this study are to identify important assessment indicators associated with seniors' walking and to test their reliability using inter-rater and intra-rater reliability methods. A set of assessment indicators was identified through literature review, and field studies by trained raters were conducted in three senior centers located in Seongnam area in order to test reliability of the audit tool. The results indicated high percent agreement for most indicators and overall 91.6% and 86.1% of items assessed had good or medium inter-rater and intra-rater reliability, respectively. The reliable assessment indicators would provide reliable data for use in community-based audits of built environment in relation to walking among older adults. The findings showed that the indicators of aesthetics had lower reliability compare to safety, convenience, and access. Rater training with various images would improve rater agreement while reduce rater bias.

Keywords

References

  1. Brownson, R., Hoehner, C., Brennan, L.., Cook, R., Elliott, M, McMullen, K. (2004). Reliability of 2 instruments for auditing the environment for physical activity. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 1, 191-208. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.1.3.191
  2. Clifton, K.J., Livi-Smith, A.D., Rodriguez, D. (2007). The development and testing of an audit for the pedestrian environment. Landscape and Urban Planning, 80, 95-1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.06.008
  3. Cunningham, G., Michael, Y., Farquhar, S., Lapidus, J.(2005). Developing a reliable senior walking environmental assessment tool. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 29 (3), 215-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2005.05.002
  4. Day, K., Boarnet, M., Alfonzo, M., Forsyth, A.(2006). The Irvine-Minnesota inventory to measure built environments. American. Journal of Preventative Medicine, 30, 144-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2005.09.017
  5. Hoehner, C.., Ivy, A., Brennan Ramirez, L., Meriwether, B., Brownson, R.C.(2006). How reliably do community members audit the neighborhood environment for its support of physical activity? Journal of Public Health Management Practice, 12, 270-277. https://doi.org/10.1097/00124784-200605000-00008
  6. Millington, C., Thompson, C. Rowe D. Aspinall P., .Fitzsimons C. Nelson N., Mutrie, N.(2009) Development of the Scottish Walkability Assessment Tool (SWAT) Health & Place, 15, 474-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.09.007
  7. Pikora, T., Bull F, Jamrozik K, Knuiman M, Giles-Corti B, Donovan R. (2002). Developing a reliable audit instrument to measure the physical environment for physical activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23, 187-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00498-1
  8. Sallis J, Cervero R, Ascher W, Henderson K, Kraft M, Kerr J. (2006) An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annual Review of Public Health. 27, 297-322. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102100
  9. Weiss, R., Julianan M., Fahs, M. (2010). Promoting active urban aging: a measurement approach to neighborhood walkability for older adults. Cities and the Environment, 3(1). 1-17.
  10. 강현미, 박소현(2009). 구릉지 아파트단지의 보행환경 특성에 관한 연구, 대한건축학회 논문집 계획계, 25(6), 187-196.
  11. 남궁지희, 박소현 (2009). 가로환경 평가체계에 관한 기초 연구, 대한건축학회 논문집 계획계, 25(11), 237-247.
  12. 도로교통공단 웹진, http://news.koroad.or.kr
  13. 박경훈, 박종완, 정성관, 유주한 (2007). 걷기활동 증진을 위한 보행환경 평가지표의 개발, 한국환경과학회지, 16 (11), 1231-1238.
  14. 박광재 성기창 (2005) 공동주택단지 옥외공간의 장애인 편의시설 실태분석에 관한 연구 한국의료복지시설학회지, 11 (2), 45-54.
  15. 박병호, 양정모, 인병철 (2009). 고령보행자의 교통사고와 이동편의시설과의 관계(청주시를 사례로). 대한교통학회지, 27 (2). 189-197.
  16. 박소현, 최이명, 서한림 (2008). 도시 주거지의 물리적 보행환경요소 지표화에 관한 연구. 대한건축학회논문집, 2008.1. 24 (1). 161-172.
  17. 서울시정개발연구원(2005). 제2차서울특별시 보행환경 기본계획, 서울시.
  18. 신국진. 노인.장애인보호구역 지정 '하나마나', 홍보부족 신청기관 미흡 지자체 예산확보가 관건, 노컷뉴스, 2011-10-18.
  19. 신해미, 김태호, 정광섭, 원제무 (2009) 구조방정식을 이용한 신도시 보행자 서비스 질 평가지표 개발 -분당 신도시를 대상으로 - 서울도시연구 10권 1호. 183-192.
  20. 안영국, 노인공경 없는 노인보호구역, 경기일보, 2012년 02월 14일
  21. 이경환 안건혁 (2008) 커뮤니티의 물리적 환경이 지역 주민의 보행 시간에 미치는 영향. 국토계획, 42(6), 105-118.
  22. 이현영, 홍준희, 송우엽(2008). 규칙적인 노인 운동참여자의 운동동기 탐색:참여요인,재미요인,스트레스요인.한국스포츠심리학회.19(1).51-63