Analyzing the Weight of Assessment Criteria in Korea Green Building Certification System - Focused on Certification Standards for Multi-unit Apartment Projects -

국내 친환경 건축물 인증제도 평가항목의 중요도 분석 - 공동주택 인증심사기준 중심으로 -

  • Received : 2012.01.18
  • Accepted : 2012.02.12
  • Published : 2012.02.29

Abstract

Over the world, social demands and concerns of energy and resource depletions and environmental conservation have resulted in many researches and applications on sustainable development and construction. In order to support these demands and concerns, international green building certification systems such as LEED(Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) and BREEAM(Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) were developed. In Korea, the green building certification system was introduced in 2000 and widely applied to all types of new buildings in order to induce the diffusion of sustainable buildings on May, 2010. This paper investigates the importance of assessment criteria on multi-unit apartment projects among certification rating systems using the AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) method and suggests a new direction on certification assessment standards. For applying the AHP method, the survey of staffs in green building certification consulting companies and architectural design companies was conducted via e-mail. As a result, criteria like energy, indoor environment, land use, pollution control, and ecological environment among 9 main ones turned out important on assessing green building certification at multi-unit apartment projects, while criteria like water resource, transportation, maintenance management, and material and resource did relatively unimportant.

Keywords

References

  1. 김명운, 전재열, 기존 건축물의 친환경 인증 기준에 관한 비교 연구, 대한건축학회 논문집 계획계 Vol. 25. No. 11. 2009. pp.357-364.
  2. 도영희, 이승욱, 홍원화, 친환경 건축 인증제도의 비교를 통한 개선방향 연구, 대한건축학회지회연합회 학술발표대회 논문집 Vol. 6. No. 1. 2010. pp.579-582.
  3. 이상춘, 신축 건축물의 친환경 인증에 관한 연구, 대한건축학회연합논문집, Vol. 12. No. 4. 2010. pp.237-244.
  4. 이상춘, 최영준, 최율, AHP 방법을 이용한 노후학교 에너지절감을 위한 요소기술의 우선순위 결정, 한국생태환경건축학회 논문집 Vol. 11. No. 6. 2011. pp.127-132.
  5. 이승민, 친환경 건축물 인증제도, 설비저널, Vol. 39. No. 10. 2010. pp.5-10.
  6. 이정복, 차준석, 이경회. 항목별 경제적 중요도 산출에 의한 리모델링 최적화방안 연구, 대한건축학회논문집, Vol. 19. No. 5. 2003. pp.55-62.
  7. 임병훈. AHP 기법을 활용한 공공청사 신축 부지의 합리적인 선정에 관한 연구. 한국건축시공학회 논문집, Vol. 8. No. 6. 2008. pp.75-82.
  8. 정재영, 윤태권. 아파트 수요자의 선호요소에 대한 AHP 분석에 관한 연구. 한국건축시공학회 논문집, Vol. 8. No. 3. 2008. pp.51-58.
  9. 조근태. 계층분석적 의사결정, 동현출판사, 2003.
  10. 한국그린빌딩협의회, 친환경건축물인증제도 정보시스템 웹사이트 (http://www.greenbuilding.or.kr/), 2011.
  11. Aczel, J. and Saaty, T. L. Procedure for Synthesizing ratio judgments, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 27. 1983. pp.93-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(83)90028-7
  12. Saaty, T. L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, N.Y. McCraw- Hill, 1980.