Korean Journal of Health Education and Promotion (보건교육건강증진학회지)

Korean Society for Health Education and Promotion (한국보건교육건강증진학회)
권호 표지

Directions for and Challenges in Health Promotion Research: Focusing on Research Funded by the Korean Health Promotion Foundation, 2005-2011

건강증진 연구의 방향과 과제: 한국건강증진재단 연구과제(2005-2011년)를 중심으로

  • Kim, Kwang-Kee (Center for Alcohol and Gambling Problems, Inje Institute of Advanced Studies) ;
  • JeKarl, Jung (Center for Alcohol and Gambling Problems, Inje Institute of Advanced Studies) ;
  • Ham, Seung-Woo (Graduate School, Inje University) ;
  • An, Ji-Young (Design Institute, Inje University) ;
  • Park, Jung-Eun (Center for Alcohol and Gambling Problems, Inje Institute of Advanced Studies)
  • 김광기 (인제대학원대학교, 알코올 및 도박문제연구소) ;
  • 제갈정 (인제대학원대학교, 알코올 및 도박문제연구소) ;
  • 함승우 (인제대학교 대학원) ;
  • 안지영 (인제대학교 디자인연구소) ;
  • 박정은 (인제대학원대학교, 알코올 및 도박문제연구소)
  • Received : 2012.09.01
  • Accepted : 2012.09.17
  • Published : 2012.10.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: This paper aims to describe health promotion (HP) research according to HP activities, strategies, target population, and settings, and to explore challenges for HP to reflect principles and values. Methods: A content analysis was employed for all research reports funded by the Korea Health Promotion Foundation from 2005 to 2011. Content analysis was conducted according to the HP activities and strategies as mentioned in the Ottawa Charter, and by target population and setting. Challenges for HP research were explored by priority actions suggested by the International Union for Health Promotion and Education. Results: The total number of research was 384. The most popular topic was on HP actions for reorienting health services, followed by developing personal skills, creating supportive environments, building healthy public policy, and strengthening community actions. Research focusing on enabling strategies was most dominant among the HP strategies, while both advocating and mediating strategies were unlikely to be studied. An even distribution was found across target populations. The most popular setting was communities, followed by workplaces and schools. Conclusion: HP research tends to be anchored on bio-medical, individualized, and behavioral perspectives. A discussion was made to overcome this tendency by employing HP in social sciences theory and methods.

Keywords

References

  1. Abel, T. (2010). Cultural capital in health promotion. In D. McQueen, I. Kickbusch, L. Potvin, J. M. Pelikan, L. Balbo & T. Abel (Eds.), Health & modernity: The role of theory in health promotion (pp. 43-73). New York, NY: Springer.
  2. Baum, F. (2007). Cracking the nut of health equity. Promotion & Education 14(2), 90-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/10253823070140022002
  3. Breslow, L. (1999). From disease prevention to health promotion. Journal of the American Medical Association, 281, 1030-1033. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.281.11.1030
  4. Cho, B. H. (2008, January). A critical thought from humanities on health promotion in Korea. Paper presented at the 1st Forum on Health Promotion organized by Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, Seoul, Korea.
  5. Choi, E. J, Kim, D. J, Kim, K. H, & Lee, S. H. (2007). Strategies to utilize evidence for health promotion programs. Seoul, Korea: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs.
  6. Chung, A. S. (2008, December). Current situation and challenge in health promotion research. Paper presented at the 10th Anniversary Workshop for Health Promotion Research organized by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Seoul, Korea.
  7. International Union for Health Promotion and Education. (2011). Shaping the future of health promotion: priorities for action. Retrieved from http://www.iuhpe.org/uploaded/Activities/Scientific_Affairs/SFHP_ENG.pdf
  8. International Union for Health Promotion and Education. (2008). Toward domains of core competency for building global capacity in health promotion: The Galway Consensus Conference Statement. Retrieved from http://www.iuhpe.org/uploaded/Activities/Cap_building/Galway_Consensus_Statement.pdf
  9. Keleher, H., MacDougall, C., & Murphy, B. (2007). Understanding health promotion. South Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: Oxford University Press
  10. Kickbusch, I. (1996). Health promotion: A global perspective. Washington, DC: Pan American Health Organization.
  11. Kim, K. K. (2008, January). Towards integrated health promotion model. Paper presented at the 1st Forum on Health Promotion organized by the Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, Seoul, Korea.
  12. Korea Health Promotion Foundation. (2009). A collected volume of health promotion research in last 10 years: year of 2005-2007. Seoul, Korea: Author.
  13. Korea Health Promotion Foundation. (2012a). Research database. Retrieved from http://research.hp.go.kr/hpResearch/rsrptTma.dia?method=initView&mnid=021200000000
  14. Korea Health Promotion Foundation. (2012b). Annual report on health promotion research 2011. Seoul, Korea: Author.
  15. Lee, J. Y. (2007). The past and future of health promotion program in health center. Journal of Korean Society for Health Education and Promotion, 24(2), 135-148.
  16. Lee, K. S. (2005, May). Challenges and systematic modification of programs provided by health promotion fund. Paper presented at 2005 Spring Conference of the Korean Society for Health Education and Promotion, Seoul, Korea.
  17. Lee, K. S. (2006). Achievement of health promotion program in Korea. Journal of Korean Society for Health Education and Promotion, 23(1), 143-171.
  18. Potvin, L., & McQueen, D. (2010). Modernity, public health, and health promotion. In D. McQueen, I. Kickbusch, L. Potvin, J. M. Pelikan, L. Balbo & T. Abel (Eds.), Health & modernity: The role of theory in health promotion (pp. 12-20). New York, NY: Springer.
  19. McQueen, D. (2010). Critical issues in theory for health promotion. In D. McQueen, I. Kickbusch, L. Potvin, J. M. Pelikan, L. Balbo & T. Abel (Eds.), Health & modernity: The role of theory in health promotion (pp. 21-42). New York, NY: Springer.
  20. Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2011). Healthy People 2020. Seoul, Korea: Author.
  21. Morgan, A., & Ziglio, E. (2007). Revitalising the evidence base for public health: An assets model. Promotion & Education, 14(2), 17-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/10253823070140020701x
  22. Nam, J. J. (1999). Future directions for health promotion research. Health & Welfare Forum 9, 5-13.
  23. Neuendorf, . (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  24. O'Neill, M. (2012). The Ottawa Charter: A manifesto for 'protester'? Global Health Promotion, 19(2), 3-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757975912443033
  25. Ridde, V. (2007). Reducing social inequalities in health: public health, community health or health promotion? Promotion & Education, 14(2), 63-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/10253823070140021401
  26. Ridde, V., Guichard, A., & Houeto, D. (2007). Social inequalities in health from Ottawa to Vancouver: action for fair equality of opportunity. Promotion & Education, 14(2), 12-16.
  27. Wallack, L. (2006). Media advocacy: Strategy for empowering people and community. In M. Minkler (Ed.), Community organizing and community building for health (pp. 419-432). Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  28. Wallack, L., Dorfman, L., Jernigan, D., & Themba-Nixon, M. (1993). Media advocacy and public health: Power for prevention. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  29. Wise, M. (2007). The role of governance in health promotion effectiveness. In D. McQueen & C. Jones (Eds.), Global perspectives on health promotion effectiveness (pp. 259-278). New York, NY.: Springer.