Journal of Plant Biotechnology

The Korean Society of Plant Biotechnology (한국식물생명공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Growth, quality, and yield characteristics of transgenic potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) overexpressing StMyb1R-1 under water deficit

  • Received : 2011.06.22
  • Accepted : 2011.07.20
  • Published : 2012.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate agronomic characteristics such as growth, quality, and yields of StMyb1R-1 transgenic potato and also to obtain the basic data for establishing assessment guidelines of transgenic potato. Three transgenic lines (Myb 1, Myb 2, and Myb 8) were cultivated under conventional irrigation, drought condition, and severe drought condition and were analyzed by comparing with wild type, non-transgenic cv. Superior. Myb 2 showed a different flower color from wild type and Myb 1 had much bigger secondary leaflets than wild type. Myb 1 and Myb 2 showed higher $P_2O_5$ content in both top and root zone and longer shaped tubers than wild type. In yield factors, transgenic lines had more tubers than wild type, however their yield decreases were severe because of the poor enlargement of tuber under water deficit condition. This tendency was noticeable in Myb 1 and Myb 2. In TR ratio, chlorophyll content, dry matter rate, and relative water content, there were no big differences between transgenic lines and wild type. Meanwhile, in phenotype, growth, quality, and yield factors, substantial equivalent was confirmed between Myb 8 and wild type. Then, Myb 8 showed the highest marketable tuber yield under conventional irrigation, while showed lower level than wild type under water deficit. Judged by this result, the enhancing droughttolerance by StMyb1R-1 gene might actually not mean the enhancement of photosynthesis or starch accumulation in tuber and, furthermore, not the yield improvement. More detailed research will be required to accurately understand the relationship between StMyb1R-1 and yield factors.

Keywords

References

  1. Burton WG (1989) The potato. Lontransgenican Scientific & Technical Lontransgenican Group UK Limited England Third Edition pp 742
  2. Cellini F, Chesson A, Colquhoun I, Constable A, Davies HV, Engel KH, Gatehouse AMR, Karenlampi S, Kok EJ, Leguay JJ, Lehesranta S, Noteborn HPJM, Pedersen J, Smith M (2004) Unintended effects and their detection in genetically modified crops. Food and Chemical Toxicology 42:1089-1125 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2004.02.003
  3. Cho HH, Park YE, Cho JH, Kim SY (2003) Historical review of land race potatoes in Korea. J Kor Soc Hort Sci 44:838-845
  4. Choi KH, Jeon JH, Kim HS, Joung YH, Cho SJ, Lim YP, Joung H (1996) Development of herbicide-resistant transgenic potato. Korean J Plant Tissue culture 23:161-165
  5. Craig H (2008) Unintended effects of genetic manipulation. The nature institute. http://natureinstitute.org/txt/ch/nontarget.php
  6. Denekamp M, Smeekens SC (2003) Integration of wounding and osmotic stress signals determines the expression of the AtMYB102 transcription factor gene. Plant Physiology 132: 1415-1423 https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.102.019273
  7. Devaiah BN, Madhuvantihi R, Karthikeyan AS, Raghothama KG (2009) Phosphate starvation responses and gibberellic acid biosynthesis are regulated by the MYB62 transcription factor in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant 2:43-58 https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssn081
  8. Ding Z, Li S, An X, Liu X, Qin H, Wang D (2009) Transgenic expression of MYB15 confers enhanced sensitivity to abscisic acid and improved drought tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Genetics & Genomics 36:17-29 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1673-8527(09)60003-5
  9. Douches DS, Li W, Zarka K, Coombs J, Pett W, Grafius E, El-Nasr T (2002) Development of Bt-cry5 insect-resistant potato lines 'Spunta-G2' and 'Spunta-G3'. HortScience 37:1103-1107
  10. Ekin Z (2011) Some analytical quality characteristics for evaluating the utilization and consumption of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tubers. African J of Biotech 10:6001-6010
  11. Ezekiel R, Singh B, Gopal J (2003) Relationship between under water weight and specific gravity, dry matter and starch content of potatoes grown in India. Potato J 30:233-239
  12. FAOSTAT (2012) http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx
  13. Fujii H, Chinnusamy V, Rodrigues A, Rubio S, Antoni R, Park SY, Cutler SR, Sheen J, Rodriguez PL, Zhu JK (2009) In vitro reconstitution of an abscisic acid signalling pathway. Nature 462:660-664 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08599
  14. Galmes J, Flexas J, Save R, Medrano H (2007) Water relations and stomatal characteristics of Mediterranean plants with different growth forms and leaf habits: responses to water stress and recovery. Plant Soil 290:139-155 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-006-9148-6
  15. Grafius EJ, Douches DS (2008) The present and future role of insect-resistant genetically modified potato cultivars in IPM. Integration of Insect-Resistant Genetically Modified Crops within IPM Programs Progress in Biological Control. Romeis J, Shelton AM, Kennedy GG, Eds. Springer Berlin Germany pp 195-221
  16. Hanneman JrRE (1989) The potato germplasm resource. Amer Potato J 66:655-667 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02853985
  17. Jung C, Seo JS, Han SW, Koo YJ, Kim CH, Song SI, Nahm BH, Choi YD, Cheong JJ (2008) Overexpression of AtMYB44 enhances stomatal closure to confer abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 146:623-635
  18. Kim HC, Kim HM (2003) Risk assessment of genetically modified organisms. J Toxicol Pub Health 19:1-12
  19. Kim B, Maria PR, Desmond B, Julien V, Paul B, Hailing J, Ronald K, Keith R, Cathie M (2007) Wild-type of cell and petal morphogenesis by R2R3 MYB transcription factors. Development 134:1691-1701 https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.02836
  20. Kleinkopf GE, Westermann DT, Wille MJ, Kleinshmidt GD (1987) Specific gravity of russet burbank potatoes. Amer Potato J 64:579-587 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02853760
  21. Kolbe H, Stefan-Beckmann S (1997) Development, growth and chemical composition of the potato crop (Solanum tuberosum L.). II. Tuber and whole plant. Potato Res 40:135-153 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02358240
  22. Li PH (1985) Potato physiology. Academic Press Inc London pp 586
  23. Liao Y, Zou HF, Wang HW, Zhang WK, Ma B, Zhang JS, Chen SY (2008) Soybean transgenicMYB76, transgenicMYB92, and transgenicMYB177 genes confer stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Cell Res 18:1047-1060 https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2008.280
  24. Lippold F, Sanchez DH, Musialak M, Schlereth A, Scheible WR, Hincha DK, Udvardi MK (2009) AtMyb41 regulates transcriptional and metabolic responses to osmotic stress in arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 149:1761-1772 https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.134874
  25. Lisinska G, Leszczynski W (1989) Potato science and technology. Elsevier Applied Science London UK pp 16-43, 166-233
  26. Miller GL (1959) Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugars. Analytical Chemistry 31:426-428 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60147a030
  27. Otroshy M (2006) Utilization of tissue culture techniques in a seed potato tuber production scheme. PhD Thesis, Wageningen University pp 14
  28. Qiang X, Keqin Y, Andan Z, Junli Y, Qing L, Jianchen Z, Xiuxin D (2009) Comparative transcripts profiling reveals new insight into molecular processes regulating lycopene accumulation in a sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) red-flesh mutant. BMC Genomics 10:540. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-10-540
  29. Riechman JL, Lain S, Garcia JA (1992) Highlights and prospects of potyvirus molecular biology. J Gen Virol 73:1-16 https://doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-73-1-1
  30. Rural Development Administration (RDA) (1988) Methods for chemical analysis of soil and plant. Agricultural Research Institute
  31. Rural Development Administration (RDA) (2003) A standard research and investigation analysis method of agricultural science technology
  32. Shin DJ, Moon SJ, Han SY, Kim BG, Park SR, Lee SK, Yoon HJ, Lee HE, Kwon HB, Baek DW, Yi BY, Byun MO (2011) Expression of StMYB1R-1, a novel potato single MYB-Like domain transcription factor, increases drought tolerance. Plant Physiology 155:421-432 https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.163634
  33. Smith HA, Powers H, Swaney S, Brown C, Dougherty WG (1995) Transgenic potato virus Y resistance in potato: Evidence for an RNA-mediated cellular response. Phytopathology 85:864-870 https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-85-864
  34. Stalham MA (Agriculture & Horticulture Development Board) (2008) Management of tuber water status to reduce bruising. http://www.potato.org.uk/sites/default/files/%5Bcurrent-page%3Aarg%3A%3F%5D/20088%20Tuber%20water%20Bruising%20Final%20Report%20R263.pdf
  35. Struik PC, Haverkort AJ, Vreugdenhil D, Bus CB, Dankert R (1990) Manipulation of tuber-size distribution of a potato crop. Potato Res 33:417-432 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02358019
  36. van Eck HJ, Jeanne MEJ, Piet S, Jacqueline T, Willem JS, Jacobsen E (1994) Multiple alleles for tuber shape in diploid potato detected by qualitative and quantitative genetic analysis using RFLPs. Genetics Society of America 137:303-309
  37. van Es A, Hartmans KJ (1987) Structure and chemical composition of the potato, in storage of potatoes (eds. A. Rastovski, A. Van Es et al.), Pudoc Wageningen pp 15-78
  38. Verma SC, Malhotra VP, Joshi KC, Sharma TR (1971) Specific gravity and dry matter content of potato. Potato Res 14:94-95 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02355934
  39. Villalobos MA, Bartels D, Iturriaga G (2004) Stress tolerance and glucose insensitive phenotypes in Arabidopsis overexpressing the CpMYB10 transcription factor gene. Plant Physiol 135:309-324 https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.034199
  40. WBGU (German Advisory Council on Global Change) (2008) Climate change as a security risk. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York pp 93-102

Cited by

  1. Drought-Simulation Facility for Assessing Tolerance and Risks of Genetically Modified Crops vol.26, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12719/KSIA.2014.26.3.303
  2. Nutritional Assessment for Grain and Whole Rice Plant of Drought-tolerant GM Rice (Agb0103) vol.30, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12719/KSIA.2018.30.3.233