Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering (산업경영시스템학회지)

Society of Korea Industrial and System Engineering (한국산업경영시스템학회)
권호 표지

A Comparative Study of the Success Factors of Quality on Business Performance : Focused on Business Scale

품질성공요소가 경영성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 비교연구 : 기업규모를 중심으로

  • Ko, Young-Hak (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, University of Incheon) ;
  • Chung, Young-Bae (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, University of Incheon)
  • 고영학 (인천대학교 산업경영공학과) ;
  • 정영배 (인천대학교 산업경영공학과)
  • Received : 2012.07.27
  • Accepted : 2012.09.14
  • Published : 2012.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to observe effect on a result of a business performance depending on the business scale and the success factors of quality. Verified hypothesis of the quality of success factors and business performance are conducted in order to conduct this research. The results of hypothesis testing can be summarized as follows : First, depending on the size of the company, quality of corporate success factors in the management and significant positive was verified to be in effect. Second, depending on the size of the small business companies' human resource management, product/process is significantly positive in effect and medium companies' quality information, quality of suppliers in the commercialization of technology is significantly positive in effect. Third, depending on the size of the small business companies' human resource management, product/process financial performance is significantly positive in effect and mid-sized companies, suppliers in the quality significantly positive show the influence of financial performance. The results of measurement through the size of the enterprise and the successful factors of quality impacts on business performance directly.

Keywords

References

  1. 김정태; "품질경영발전단계에 따른 품질경영 성공요인", 박사학위논문, 계명대학교 대학원, 1994.
  2. 노부호, 박영수; "한국기업의 전략적 품질경영과 경영성과", 품질경영학회지, 27(1) : 1-16, 1999.
  3. 서창석; "품질경영요인이 기업성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증 연구", 서강대학교 경영논문, 8, 2003.
  4. 한국인정원(KAB), www.kab.or.kr.
  5. Asif, M., de Bruijn, E. J., Fisscher, A. M., Searcy, C., and Steenhuis, H. J.; "Process embedded design of integrated management systems," International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 26(3) : 261-282, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710910936735
  6. Deming, W. E.; Out of the crisis, Cambridge : MIT Center for Advanced Engineering, 1986.
  7. Dordevic, D., Besic, C., Milosevic, D., and Bogetic, S.; "Development of integrated management systems in SMES in Serbia," Management, 5(2) : 99-114, 2010.
  8. Dulworth, M. R., Landen, D. L., and Usilaner, B. L., "Employ involvement systems in U.S. corporations : Right objectives, wrong strategies," National Productivity Review, 9(2) : 141-156, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1002/npr.4040090204
  9. Evans, R.; "In Defence of TQM," Magazing, 7(1), 1995.
  10. Flynn, B. B., Schroeder, R. G., and Sakakibarac, S., "A framework for international quality management research and an associated measurement instrument," Journal of Operations Management, 11(4) : 339-366, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(97)90004-8
  11. Foley, O., Helfert, M., and Elwood, L.; "The impact of diverse information systems environments on information quality-A design science approach," Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Management and Evaluation, 77-85, 2010.
  12. Garvin, D. A.; "Japanese quality management," The Columbia Journal of World Business, 19 : 3-12, 1984.
  13. Gibson, T. C.; "Helping leaders accept leadership of total quality management," Quality Progress, November, 45-47, 1990.
  14. Gilbert, R. J.; "Are you committed or committed?," Quality Progress, May, 45-48, 1990.
  15. Godfrey, A. B.; "Ten areas for future research in total quality management," Quality Management Journal, 1 : 47-70, 1993.
  16. Goetsch, D. and Davis, S.; Introduction to total quality : Quality, productivity, competitiveness (2nd ed.). London : Macmillan, Reliability Management, 8 : 24-34, 1994.
  17. Hoyle, D.; Quality System Handbook, Butter worth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2nd ed. 1994.
  18. Joseph, L. C.; Sourcing and supplier management, Anderson Consulting, 1994.
  19. Joyce, P., Seaman, C., and Woods, A.; Small firms : Contribution to economic regeneration, The Institute For Small Business Affairs, London, 1996.
  20. Juran, J. M.; "The Quality trilogy," Quality Progress, 12-24, 1986.
  21. Kargra, L. and Pranell, J. A.; "Strategic planning emphasis and planning satisfaction in small firms : An empirical investigation," Journal of Business Strategies, 13(1) : 42-64, 1996.
  22. Leonard, F. and Sasser, W. E.; "The incline of quality," Harvard Business Review, September-October, 163-171, 1982.
  23. March, J. G.; "Exploitation and exploration in organizational learning," Organization Science, 2 : 71-87, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
  24. Miller, D. and Toulouse, J. M.; "Chief Executive Personality and Corporate Strategy and Structure," Management Science, 32 : 1389-1409, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1389
  25. Mitchell, W. and Singh, K.; "Survival commercialize complex goods," Strategic of businesses using collaborative relationships to Management Journal, 17(3) : 169-195, 1996.
  26. Peterson, D., "How Donald Peterson turned Ford around," Boardroom Reports, 15 June, 1992.
  27. Rao, S. S., Solis, L. E., and Raghunathan, T. S.; "A framework for international quality management research : Development and validation of a measurement instrument," Total Quality Management, 10(7) : 1047-1075, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954412997226
  28. Saraph. J. V., Benson, P. G., and Schroeder, R. G.; "An instrument for measuring the critical factor of quality management," Decision Science, 20 : 810-829, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1989.tb01421.x
  29. Zairi, M., Letza, S. R., and Oakland, J. S.; "Does TQM Impact on Bottom-Line Results?," The TQM Magazing, 6(1) : 40, 1994.