DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Dynamic Properties of Crushed Stones Used as Reinforced Trackbed Foundation Materials Using Midsize Resonant Column Test apparatus

중형 공진주 시험기를 이용한 국내 쇄석 강화노반재료의 동적특성 평가

  • Lim, Yujin (Department of Civil, Environmental and Railroad Engineering, PaiChai University) ;
  • Lee, SeongHyeok (Korea Railroad Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, Jinwoog (Korea Railroad Research Institute) ;
  • Cho, Hojin (Department of Civil, Environmental and Railroad Engineering, PaiChai University)
  • Received : 2012.07.17
  • Accepted : 2012.10.05
  • Published : 2012.10.30

Abstract

In this study, a mid-size RC test apparatus equipped with analyzing program is developed that can test samples up to D=10cm diameter and H=20cm height which is larger than usual samples of D=5cm and H=10cm used mostly in practice. Thus, crushed stones with larger grains up to 38mm in diameter used mostly in Korea as reinforced trackbed materials in track construction could be considered effectively than conventionally used RC apparatus for evaluation of the dynamic properties of the materials by using the newly developed RC apparatus. The RC test apparatus was designed and assembled based on the concept of fixed-free fixity conditions and driving mechanism proposed by Stokoe. Using the developed RC test apparatus, three types of representative crushed reinforced trackbed materials were tested in order to get the dynamic properties of the materials such as $G/G_{max}$ reduction curves and damping ratio D. For comparison purpose, a small RC test apparatus has been used to test the same materials.

본 연구에서는 국내에서 보편적으로 사용되는 최대입경이 38mm에 이르는 쇄석 강화노반재료에 대한 동적 변형특성을 평가하기 위하여 직경 D=10cm, 길이 L=20cm의 시편을 시험할 수 있는 Stokoe방식의 고정단-자유단 중형 공진주 시험기 및 구동시스템과 해석프로그램을 제작하였다. 이렇게 완성된 중형 공진주 시험기를 이용하여 우리나라의 대표적인 석산 쇄석 강화노반재료에 대하여 공진주 시험을 수행하였다. 또한 소형(D=5cm) 공진주 시험기를 이용하여 동일한 재료로 시험을 수행하여 전단탄성계수(G) 감소곡선과 정규화 전단탄성계수($G/G_{max}$) 및 감쇠비(D) 곡선을 구하고 소형과 중형 공진주 시험결과에 대한 비교 분석을 실시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. M.T. Bui (2009) Influence of Some Particle Characteristics on the Small Strain Response of Granular Materials, Ph.D Dissertation, The University of Southampton.
  2. H.B. Seed, R.T. Wong, I.M. Idriss, K. Tokimuatsu (1986) Moduli and Damping Factors for Dynamic Analyses of Cohesionless Soils, J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., ASCE, 112(11), pp. 1016-1032.
  3. B.O. Hardin, V. Drenevich (1972) Shear modulus and damping in soil: Design equation and curves, J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., ASCE, 98(7), pp. 667-692.
  4. B.O. Hardin, V. Drenevich (1972) Shear modulus and damping in soil: Measurement and parameter effects, J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., ASCE, 98(7), pp. 603-624.
  5. H.B. Seed, R.T. Wong, I.M. Idriss, K. Tokimuatsu (1984) Moduli and Damping Factors for Dynamic Analyses of Cohesionless Soils, Earthquake Engineering Research Center Report No. UCB/EERC-84/14, University of California, Berkeley.
  6. M. Vucetic, R. Dobry (1991) Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response, J. of Geotechnical Engineering, 117(1), pp. 89-107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:1(89)
  7. M.B. Darendeli, K.H. II Stokoe (1997) Dynamic properties of soils subjected to the 1994 Northridge earthquake, Geotechnical Engineering Report GR97-5, Civil Engineering Dept., University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA.
  8. K. Ishihara (1996) Soil behavior in earthquake geotechnics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  9. K. Ishibash, X. Zhang (1993) Unified dynamic shear moduli and damping ratios of sand and clay, Soils and Foundations, 33(1), pp. 182-191 https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.33.182
  10. K. Kwon, D. Kim (2000) Alternative Method of Determining Resilient Modulus of Subbase Materials Using Free-Free Resonant Column Test, Journal Korean Society of Road Engineers, 2(2), pp. 149-161.
  11. F.Y. Menq (2003) Dynamic properties of sandy and gravelly soils, PhD Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin.
  12. C. S Park (2008) Evaluation of Resilient Modulus and Quality Control Procedure for Railroad Trackbeds Based on Dynamic Properties, PhD dissertation, KyungHee University.
  13. T. Wichtmann, T. Triantafyllidis (2009) On the influence of the grain size distribution curve of quartz sand on th esamll strain shear modulus $G_{max}$, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 135(10), pp. 1404-1418. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000096
  14. Korea Rail Network Authority (2011) Rail design standard specification, Korea.
  15. AASHTO T 307-99 (2007) Standard method of test for determining the resilient modulus of soils and aggregate materials, American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials.
  16. H.B. Seed, I.M. Idriss (1970) Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analyses, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Report No. EERC-70-10, Univ. of California, Berkeley, California.

Cited by

  1. Design Graphs for Asphalt Concrete Track with Wide Sleepers Using Performance Parameters vol.19, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7782/JKSR.2016.19.3.331
  2. Evaluation of Resilient Modulus for Reinforced Trackbed using Large Triaxial Tests vol.17, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7782/JKSR.2014.17.6.415
  3. Dynamic Properties for Geomaterials of Railway as Determined by Large-scale Cyclic Triaxial Test vol.17, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7782/JKSR.2014.17.1.43
  4. Investigation of Stiffness Characteristics of Subgrade Soils under Tracks Based on Stress and Strain Levels vol.16, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7782/JKSR.2013.16.5.386