Journal of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology(JNFCWT) (방사성폐기물학회지)

Korean Radioactive Waste Society (한국방사성폐기물학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Production and Application of Domestic Input Data for Safety Assessment of Disposal

처분안전성평가를 위한 국내고유 입력자료의 확보와 적용

  • Received : 2012.08.09
  • Accepted : 2012.09.15
  • Published : 2012.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

To provide domestic values of input parameters in a safety assessment of radioactive waste disposal under domestic deep underground environments, various kinds of experiments have been carried out under KURT (KAERI Underground Research Tunnel) conditions. The input parameters were classified, and some of them were selected for this study by the criteria of importance. The domestic experimental data under KURT environments were given top priority in the data review process. Foreign data under similar conditions to KURT were also gathered. The collected data were arranged and the statistical calculations were processed. The properties and distribution of the data were explained and compared to foreign values in view of their validity. The following parameters were analysed: failure time and early time failure rate of a container, solubility of nuclides, porosity and density of the buffer, and distribution coefficients of nuclides in the geomedia, hydraulic conductivity, diffusion depth of nuclides, groundwater flow rate, fracture aperture, length of internal fracture, and width of faulted rock mass in the host rock.

국내 심부지질환경조건을 반영한 처분안전성 평가에 필요한 입력자료를 제공하기위해, 그 동안 국내 지하시험시설(KURT)환경조건에서 많은 실험을 수행해 왔다. 안전성평가코드에 사용되는 많은 입력변수들 중 중요성이 부각되는 입력변수들을 선정하여, 각 변수별로 수집한 자료를 통계처리를 하여 값 분포 특성을 기술하고, 외국자료 값과 비교평가를 통해 값의 타당성을 검토하였다. 다룬 입력변수로서 용기물성분야에서 용기수명, 초기파손률을, 완충재물성분야에서는 핵종용해도, 완충재의 공극률, 밀도, 확산계수, 핵종분배계수를, 암반 및 원계영역에서는 수리전도도, 지하수유속, 핵종분배계수, 확산깊이, 암반균열폭, 주지하수유동통로까지 거리, 핵종이동오염운의 너비 등이다.

Keywords

References

  1. M.H.Baik, C.K.Park, S.S.Kim, J.K.Lee, and S.Y.Lee, Investigation on nuclide migration behaviors, KAERI/TR-3433/2011 (2011) (in Korean).
  2. J.W.Lee and W.J.Cho, Hydrothermal behaviors and long-term stability of bentonite buffer materials, J. of the Korean Radioactive Waste Society, 52, pp.145 (2007) (in Korean).
  3. K.S.Kim, K.W.Park, K.Y.Kim, and H.J.Choi, Development of advanced Korean reference HLW disposal system - Site Characteristics, KAERI/TR-4265/2011, pp.64 (2011) (in Korean).
  4. T.Rummery and E.Rosinger, Nuclear fuel waste management : the Canadian approach, NUCLEX'81 (1981).
  5. R.Walke, A.Bath, A. Bond, N.Calder,P. Humphreys, et al. Postclosure safety assessment(VI) : data, NWMO DGR-TR-2009-08 (2009).
  6. SKB, Data report for the safety assessment SRsite, SKB TR-10-52 (2010).
  7. USNRC, Performance assessment : a model for scoping of options and analyzing risk, user guide (2010).
  8. USDOE, Total system performance assessment, DOE/RW-0508 (1998).
  9. JNC, H12: Project to establish the scientific and technical basis for HLW disposal in Japan, Vol.3 (2000).
  10. Freeze, R.A., and Cherry, J.A., Groundwater, Prentice-Hall, U.S.A (1979).
  11. P.Vilks, J.Cramer, M.Jensen, N.Miller, Indiffusion experiment in granite, J. of Cont. Hydrol. 61, pp.191 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7722(02)00135-3
  12. T. Vandergraaf,K.Tickner, T.Melnyk, The selection of sorption data base for the geosphere model, J. of Cont. Hydrol. 13, pp.327 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-7722(93)90069-5
  13. Srikanta Mishra, Assigning probability distributions to input parameters of performance assessment models, SKB TR02- 11 (2002).
  14. Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare, Report on 2002 national nutrition survey by season (2002) (in Korean).
  15. U.Bergstrm, S.Nordlinder, I.Aggeryd, Models for dose assessments: modules for various biosphere types, SKB TR-99-14 (1999).
  16. A.Martin, The long term diffusion project, 10th ISCO meeting GTS phase VI (2012).
  17. Y.M. Lee and Y.S. Hwang, A GoldSim Model for the Safety Assessment of an HLW Repository, Progress in Nuclear Energy, 51, pp.746, (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2009.05.002

Cited by

  1. Preliminary Post-closure Safety Assessment of Disposal Options for Disused Sealed Radioactive Source vol.49, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.9719/EEG.2016.49.4.301
  2. Long-term Environmental Assessment of Waste from PyroGreen System vol.21, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proche.2016.10.059
  3. Post-closure safety assessment of near surface disposal facilities for disused sealed radioactive sources vol.313, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.01.001
  4. Sensitivity Analyses of Three-Dimensional Discrete Fracture Network Modeling of Rock Mass vol.25, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7474/TUS.2015.25.4.341
  5. A Probabilistic Safety Assessment of a Pyro-processed Waste Repository vol.10, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7733/jkrws.2012.10.4.263
  6. Performance and cycling of the iron-ion/hydrogen redox flow cell with various catholyte salts vol.43, pp.7, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-013-0553-2