Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety (해양환경안전학회지)

The Korean Society of Marine Environment and safety (해양환경안전학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Design of Metaevaluation Model for the Maritime Traffic Safety Assessment Scheme

해상교통안전진단제도의 메타평가 모형설계에 관한 연구

  • Cho, Kyung-Min (Busan Regional Maritime Affairs & Port Administration) ;
  • Kong, Gil-Young (Division of Navigation Science, Korea Maritime University) ;
  • Cho, Ik-Soon (Department of Ship Operation, Korea Maritime University)
  • 조경민 (부산지방해양항만청 선원해사안전과) ;
  • 공길영 (한국해양대학교 항해학부) ;
  • 조익순 (한국해양대학교 선박운항과)
  • Received : 2013.07.19
  • Accepted : 2013.08.28
  • Published : 2013.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The efforts for improving 'Maritime Traffic Safety Assessment Scheme(MTSA scheme)' have continued to the present. At this point, it needs to establish sound MTSA scheme to proceed acceleration step through the comprehensive review and systematic approach. In this study, it aimed to design of Metaevaluation Model for the comprehensive analysis of MTSA scheme with applying theory of the Metaevaluation, that is the evaluation of evaluation. To put it concretely, This research draw a basic model by using Metaevaluation methods like as literature studies, expert reviews, surveys and etc. and proposed a available 'PIP'OU' Metaevaluation Model through verified validity and reliability. This PIP'OU Model is the first proposed Metaevaluation Model in maritime field and it is expected to be used as framework to draw up improvement measure with deriving problem for the MTSA scheme.

해상교통안전진단제도가 도입된 이후 제도개선을 위한 노력은 계속되어 왔다. 이 제도가 정착단계를 거쳐 고도화 단계로 나아가기 위해서는 진단활동 전반에 대한 종합적이고 체계적인 검토가 필요하다. 이에 본 연구에서는 해상교통안전진단에 대한 종합적인 분석 모형 설계를 목적으로 진단수행의 질적 향상을 위한 수단으로 파악되는 평가에 대한 평가, 즉 메타평가에 관한 이론을 적용하였다. 구체적으로는 메타평가의 주요 접근방식인 문헌연구와 전문가 검토, 설문조사 등의 방법으로 해상교통안전진단에 적합한 메타평가 기본모형을 도출하고, 이에 대한 타당성과 신뢰성을 검증하여 활용 가능한 'PIP'OU 메타평가 모형'을 제시하였다. 본 모형은 해상교통안전진단제도에 대한 최초의 메타평가 모형으로써 향후 제도의 문제점 도출과 개선방안 마련을 위한 해상교통안전진단제도의 메타평가 분석틀로 활용될 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. AEA(1995), American Evaluation Association, Guiding Principles for Evaluators, http://www.eval.org.
  2. Brinkerhoff, R. O., D. M. Brethower, T. Hluchyi and J. R. Nowakowski(1983), Programme Evaluation: A Practitioner's Guide for Trainers and Educators, Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing, p. 221.
  3. Chae, S. I.(2005), Social science search methodology(The 3rd edition), B&M Books. pp. 179-188.
  4. Cho, I. S., Kim I. J. and Lee Y. S.(2010), The Introductory Concept of Maritime Safety Audit as a tool for Identifying Potential Hazards, Journal of Navigation and Port Research (International Edition), Vol. 34, No. 9, pp. 699-704. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2010.34.9.699
  5. Cho, I. S.(2011), A Study on the Present Status and Future Directions of Maritime Safety Audit, Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 399-405. https://doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2011.17.4.399
  6. Cho, K. M.(2013), A Study on the Design and Application of Metaevaluation model for Maritime Traffic Safety Assessment Scheme, Doctorial Dissertation, Korea Maritime University, p. 63.
  7. Im, O. J.(2007), Meta-evaluation of evaluation system for credit bank system, Doctorial Dissertation. Kyungpook National University. p. 70.
  8. JCSEE(1994), Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation, http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/jc.
  9. Kim, B. C.(2009), Theory of Metaevaluation, Korea research information service Ltd., pp. 19-25 & 186-189.
  10. Kim, M. S.(1993), Public Policy Evaluation(revised edition), Bakyeongsa., pp. 7-11.
  11. Larson, R. C. and Berliner L.(1983), On Evaluating Evaluations, Policy Sciences, 16(2), pp. 147-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138348
  12. Lee, C. G.(1997), The study of Meta-evaluation for research development business : with IT industry as center, Doctorial Dissertation, Chungnam National University, p. 72.
  13. National Assembly Budget Office(2012), Meta-Evaluation for the Environmental Effects Evaluation system, p. 19.
  14. OECD/DAC(2006), DAC Evaluation Quality Standards(for test phase application) Network on Development Evaluation, Development Assistance Committee, http://www.oecd.org.
  15. Oh, M. G.(1986), The study of Meta-evaluation, Myongji College,, Research of Educational problems, 4, pp.151-167.
  16. Ryu, Y. S.(2007), The Design and Application of Metaevaluation Model for Technology Assessment in Korea. Doctorial Dissertation. Hanyang University, pp. 64-68 & 119.
  17. Scriven, M.(1991), Evaluation Thesaurus(4th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 230-231.
  18. Shin, Y.(2011), Improvement of judge management system for self-inspection : by Meta-evaluation, The Korean Association for Public Management, 25(2), pp. 1-25.
  19. Stufflebeam, D. L.(1974), Metaevaluation, Occasional Paper Series, 3, Kalamazoo: The Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University.
  20. UNEG(2005), United Nations Evaluation Group, Norms for Evaluation in the UN System, http://www.uneval.org.

Cited by

  1. A Study on the Improvement of Maritime Traffic Safety Assessment Scheme by applying Metaevaluation Model vol.37, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2013.37.4.383
  2. A Study on Connectivity between Maritime Traffic Safety Audit Scheme and Sea Area Utilization Impact Assessment vol.20, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2014.20.2.165
  3. Study on the Improvement Strategy of Specialized Institution for Efficient Operations of Maritime Traffic Safety Audit Scheme vol.21, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2015.21.1.018
  4. 해상교통안전진단 사후관리제도의 도입 및 제도개선에 관한 고찰 vol.22, pp.7, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2016.22.7.807
  5. 유전 알고리즘을 활용한 부유식 해상풍력단지 최적위치 선정 vol.25, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2019.25.6.658
  6. Simulation Study of the IAMSAR Standard Recovery Maneuvers for the Improvement of Serviceability vol.8, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8060445