Food Science and Preservation (한국식품저장유통학회지)

The Korean Society of Food Preservation (한국식품저장유통학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The antioxidant capacities of imported red wines (Cabernet Sauvignon) from US and Chile

미국 및 칠레산 수입 레드 와인(Cabernet Sauvignon)의 항산화능

  • Lee, Hye-Ryun (School of Food Science and Biotechnology, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Hwang, In-Wook (School of Food Science and Biotechnology, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Ha, Hyoung-Tae (School of Food Science and Biotechnology, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Chung, Shin-Kyo (School of Food Science and Biotechnology, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2013.06.14
  • Accepted : 2013.11.04
  • Published : 2013.10.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The physicochemical characteristics and antioxidant capacities of 15 red wines (Cabernet Sauvignon) from the US (5) and Chile (10) were investigated. The contents of soluble solid, reducing sugar, titratable acidity, and $SO_2$ were measured. Antioxidant capacities were examined by DPPH, ORAC assay, and total phenolic contents. In addition, polyphenols composition were analyzed by HPLC. The contents of soluble solid, reducing sugar, and acidities were 7.03~8.6 $^{\circ}Brix$, 2.7~6.7 g/L, and 0.7~0.8%, respectively, and showed no differences between wines from the two countries (p<0.05). The $SO_2$ content of Chile wines was 50% higher than that of US wines (p<0.05). Antioxidant activities by DPPH assay ranged 5.58~9.80 mM and 6.77~9.48 mM in the US and Chile wines, respectively. The ORAC values of the US and Chile wines ranged 2.17~18.08 mM and 4.55~33.77 mM, respectively. The total phenolic content ranged from 1,315 to 2,651 mg/L among the US red wines, and from 1,653 to 2,493 mg/L among Chile red wines. Gallic acid, catechin, syringic acid, p-coumaric acid, quercetin, and kaempferol were identified by HPLC. The polyphenol contents of the Chile red wines were higher than those of the US red wines(p<0.05). There were no differences in the physicochemical characteristics and the antioxidant capacities of the wines from US and Chile, but only in their $SO_2$ and polyphenol contents (p<0.05).

국내에서 주로 수입되고 있는 Cabernet Sauvignon 레드와인(미국산 5종, 칠레산 10종)의 이화학적인 품질 특성과 항산화활성 및 폴리페놀 화합물의 조성을 조사하였다. 가용성 고형분은 7.03~8.6 $^{\circ}Brix$, 환원당은 2.7~6.7 g/L, 산도는 0.7~0.8% 범위이었으며, 미국산과 칠레산의 유의적인 차이는 없었다(p<0.05). 이산화황 함량은 미국산이 33 mg/L, 칠레산이 45 mg/L로 칠레산이 높았다(p<0.05). DPPH 방법과 ORAC 방법에 의한 항산화 활성과 총페놀 함량은 미국산보다 칠레산이 조금 높았으나 유의적인 차이는 없었다(p<0.05). 산 가수분해 방법으로 레드 와인 중의 폴리페놀 화합물을 HPLC로 분석한 결과 gallic acid, catechin, syringic acid, p-coumaric acid, quercetin, kaempferol의 6종이 확인되었으며, 이 중 catechin의 함량이 가장 높았고 폴리페놀화합물의 총 함량은 칠레산이 미국산에 비하여 높았다(p<0.05). 미국산과 칠레산 Cabernet Sauvignon 와인의 이화학적 특성과 항산화능은 이산화황 함량과 폴리페놀화합물의 함량이외에는 유의차가 없었다(p<0.05).

Keywords

References

  1. Renaud S, De Lorgeril M (1992) Wine alcohol, platelets and the French paradox for coronary heart disease. Lancet, 339, 1523-1526 https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(92)91277-F
  2. The trade statistical data (2007) Korea Agricultural Trade Information, Korea Agro-Fisheries Trade Corporation, http://www.kati.net/
  3. Frankel EN, Kanner J, German JB (1993) Inhibition of oxidation human low density lipoprotein by phenolic substances in red wine. Lancet, 41, 454-457
  4. Paganga G, Miller N, Rice-Evans CA (1999) The polyphenolic content of fruit and vegetables and their antioxidant activities. What does a serving constitute?. Free Radical Res, 30, 153-162 https://doi.org/10.1080/10715769900300161
  5. Yook C, Seo MH, Lee JW, Kim YH, Lee KY (2008) Quality properties of wines fermented with domestic new different grapes. Korean J Food Sci Technol, 40, 633-642
  6. Hwang SW, Park HD (2009) Characteristics of red wine fermentation of freeze-concentrated Campbell Early grape juice using various wine yeasts. Korean J Food Preserv, 16, 977-984
  7. Chapman MD, Matthews MA, Gguinard JX (2004) Sensory attributes of Cabernet Sauvignon wines made from vines different crop yields. Am J Enol Vitic, 55, 325-334
  8. Miller GL (1959) Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem, 31, 426-428 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60147a030
  9. AOAC (2000) Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC Intl. (17th ed), Vol. II, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gathersburg, Maryland, USA
  10. Ough CS, Amerine MA (1988) Methods of analyses of musts and wines, 2nd Ed, Wiley Publishing Co, NY, USA. 198-235
  11. Blois MS (1958) Antioxidant determinations by the use of a stable free radical. Nature, 181, 1199-1200 https://doi.org/10.1038/1811199a0
  12. Ou B, Hampsch-Woodill M, Prior RL (2001) Development and validation of an improved oxygen radical absorbance capacity assay using fluorescein as the fluorescent probe. J Agric Food Chem, 49, 4619-4626 https://doi.org/10.1021/jf010586o
  13. Sato M, Ramarathnam N, Suzuki Y, Ohkubo T, Takeuchi M, Ochi H (1996) Varietal differences in the phenolic content and superoxide radical scavenging potential of wines from different sources. J Agric Food Chem, 44, 37-44 https://doi.org/10.1021/jf950190a
  14. Hertog MGL, Hollman PCH, Venema DP (1992) Optimization of quantitative HPLC determination of potentially anticarcinogenic flavonoids in fruit and vegetables. J Agric Food Chem, 40, 1591-1598 https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00021a023
  15. Kim HA, Cho MH, Lee KH (2009) Studies on the sensory characteristics of Korean wine and imported wine. J East Asian Soc Dietary Life, 19, 593-602
  16. Kim EK, Kim I, Ko JY, Yim SB, Jeong Y (2010) Physicochemical characteristics and accessability of commercial low-priced french wines. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr, 39, 1666-16671 https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2010.39.11.1666
  17. Chang EH, Jeong ST, Park KS, Yun HK, Roh JH, Jang HI, Choi JY (2008) Characteristics of domestic and imported red wines. Korean J Food Preserv, 15, 203-208
  18. Villano D, Fernandez-Pachon MS, Rroncoso AM, Garcla-parrilla MC (2006) Influence of enological practices on the antioxidant activity of wines. Food Chem, 95, 394-404 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.01.005
  19. Alexey K, Rudolf S, Hana B, Milada K, Stanislav S (2009) The Key role of grape variety for antioxidant capacity of red wines. Clinical Nutr Metab, 4, 41-46
  20. Kim TH, Yi DH, Kim HJ (2009) Effect of resveratrol on wine sensory evaluation preference analysis. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr, 38, 1740-1745 https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2009.38.12.1740
  21. Li H, Wang X, Li Y, Li P. Wang H (2009). Polyphenolic compounds and antioxidant properties of selected China wines. Food Chem, 112, 454-460 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.05.111
  22. Burin VM, Falcão LD, Caves ES, Gris EF, Preti LF, Bordignon-Luiz MT (2010), Phenolic composition, colour, antioxidant activity and mineral profile of Cabernet Sauvignon wines. Food Sci Tech 45, 1505-1512 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2010.02296.x
  23. Chang SW, Song JH, Shin JS, Lee KY, Rho YT (2009) Determination of major phenolic compounds of grape juice and wine of different geographic origins. Korean J Food Preserv, 16, 747-753
  24. Burns J, Gardner PT, Oneil J, Crawford S, Morecroft I, McPhail DB (2000) Relationship among antioxidant activity, vasodilation capacity, and phenolic content of red wines. J Agric Food Chem, 48, 220-230 https://doi.org/10.1021/jf9909757
  25. Vivian MB, Stefany GA, Lea LFC, Marilde TBL (2011) Determination of some phenolic compounds in red wine by RP-HPLC: method development and validation. J Chromatogr Sci, 49, 647-651 https://doi.org/10.1093/chrsci/49.8.647

Cited by

  1. Antioxidant and DNA Damage Protective Activities of Freeze-Dried Blue Mussel (Mytilus edulis) vol.43, pp.12, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2014.43.12.1801
  2. Acetaldehyde contents and quality characteristics of commercial alcoholic beverages pp.2092-6456, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-019-00564-1