DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analyzing Weights of Certification Assessment Criteria on the G-SEED System Using the AHP Method -Focused on Certification Standards for Apartment Buildings-

계층분석법을 이용한 녹색건축 인증제도 평가항목의 중요도 분석 -공동주택 인증기준을 중심으로-

  • Choi, Yeo Jin (School of Architecture, Catholic University of Daegu)
  • Received : 2013.11.18
  • Accepted : 2013.12.23
  • Published : 2013.12.31

Abstract

Many countries over the world have taken many discussions and endeavors on environmental improvements of energy savings and greenhouse gas emission reductions for solving global climate change problems. In Korea, pre-considerations of environment-conscious factors in buildings have been taken to be critical with new constructions and renovation markets. In this situation, the Korean Green Building Certification(KGBC) system to induce the diffusion of sustainable buildings was introduced in 2002 and developed as an improved version of the G-SEED(Green Standard for Energy and Environmental Design) system in 2013 after major revisions. This research examines the importance of assessment criteria on apartment buildings to certify green buildings using the AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) method and suggests a new direction on certification assessment standards from the AHP result. In order to apply the AHP method, the survey via e-mail was conducted to design staffs in domestic architectural firms. As a result, assessment criteria such as ecological environment, indoor environment, and energy & environment pollution among 7 main ones proved to be important on assessing the G-SEED system for apartment buildings, while criteria such as land use & transportation, material & resource, water circulation management, maintenance management did relatively unimportant.

Keywords

References

  1. 국토교통부. 통합녹색건축인증제 G-SEED 공식출범 (2013년 6월 27일 보도자료) / (Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. Official Launching Green Building Certification System G-SEED, Press Release. 2013.06.27)
  2. 녹색건축인증제 통합운영시스템. 2013 / (G-SEED United Operation System )
  3. 홍정만, AHP기법을 적용한 민간 기업의 신재생에너지 평가 항목에 대한 연구, 에너지경제연구, Vol. 10. No. 1. 2011, p.115-142. / (Jungman Hong. An AHP approach for the importance weight of renewable energy investment criterion in the private sector), Korea Energy Economic Review. Vol. 10. No. 1. 2011. p.115-142.)
  4. 최여진, 이상춘, 국내 친환경 건축물 인증제도 평가항목의 중요도 분석, 한국생태환경건축학회 논문집, Vol. 12. No. 1. 2012. p.83-90. / (Yeo-Jin Choi, Sang-Choon Lhee. Analyzing the Weight of assessment criteria in Korea green building certification system, Journal of Korean Institute of Architectural Sustainable Environment and Building System. Vol. 12. No. 1. 2012. p. 83-90.)
  5. T. L. Saaty. The Analytic Hierarchy Process, N.Y. McGraw-Hill, 1980.
  6. 조근태, 계층분석적 의사결정, 동현출판사, 2003. / (Keun-Tae Cho, The analytic hierarchy process, Dong-Hyun Press, 2003.)
  7. J. Aczel and T. L. Saaty, Procedure for synthesizing ration judgments, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 27. 1983. p.93-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(83)90028-7

Cited by

  1. Development of Credit Calculation Methodologies in G-SEED for Multi-Residential Buildings vol.30, pp.12, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_PD.2014.30.12.289
  2. Improvement Directions for the G-SEED System from the Resident's Perspective - Focused on Certification Assessment Criteria for Apartment Buildings - vol.14, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12813/kieae.2014.14.4.019
  3. ANP기법을 이용한 조경성능 및 친환경 평가항목 중요도 비교 vol.47, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.9715/kila.2019.47.6.045
  4. 귀농·귀촌 의사결정요인에 관한 AHP 분석 연구: 이주지역 선택 결정요인을 중심으로 vol.10, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3745/ktccs.2021.10.3.81