DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Dry Medium Culture Plates for Mesophilic Aerobic Bacteria in Milk, Ice Cream, Ham, and Codfish Fillet Products

  • Park, Junghyun (Department of Food Science and Technology, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Kim, Myunghee (Department of Food Science and Technology, Yeungnam University)
  • Received : 2013.10.15
  • Accepted : 2013.12.03
  • Published : 2013.12.31

Abstract

This study was performed to compare the performance of Sanita-Kun dry medium culture plate with those of traditional culture medium and Petrifilm dry medium culture plate for the enumeration of the mesophilic aerobic bacteria in milk, ice cream, ham, and codfish fillet. Mesophilic aerobic bacteria were comparatively evaluated in milk, ice cream, ham, and codfish fillet using Sanita-Kun aerobic count (SAC), Petrifilm aerobic count (PAC), and traditional plate count agar (PCA) media. According to the results, all methods showed high correlations of 0.989~1.000 and no significant differences were observed for enumerating the mesophilic aerobic bacteria in the tested food products. SAC method was easier to perform and count colonies efficiently as compared to the PCA and PAC methods. Therefore, we concluded that the SAC method offers an acceptable alternative to the PCA and PAC methods for counting the mesophilic aerobic bacteria in milk, ice cream, ham, and codfish fillet products.

Keywords

References

  1. Ray B. 2004. Fundamental food microbiology. 3rd ed. CRC Press, Washington, DC, USA. p 313-316.
  2. Jay JM, Loessner MJ, Golden DA. 2005. Modern food microbiology. 7th ed. Springer, New York, NY, USA. p 475.
  3. Freitas R, Nero LA, Carvalho AF. 2009. Technical note: Enumeration of mesophilic aerobes in milk: evaluation of standard official protocols and Petrifilm aerobic count plates. J Dairy Sci 92: 3069-3073. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1705
  4. Thatcher FS, Clark DS, ICMSF. 1968. Microorganisms in foods: their significance and methods of enumeration. 2nd ed. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, ON, Canada. p 25-28.
  5. Montville TJ, Matthews KR. Kniel KE. 2005. Food microbiology: An introduction. ASM Press, Washington, DC, USA. p 70.
  6. Pearson AM, Dutson TR. 1994. Quality attributes and their measurement in meat, poultry and fish products. Blackie Academic and Professional, Glasgow, UK. p 404.
  7. Morita H, Ushiyama M, Aoyama S, Iwasaki M. 2003. Sensitivity and specificity of the Sanita-Kun Aerobic Count: internal validation and independent laboratory study. J AOAC Int 86: 355-366.
  8. Kim KS, Bae EK, Ha SD, Park YS, Mok CK, Hong KP, Kim SP, Park JY. 2004. Evaluation of dry rehydratable film method for enumeration of microorganisms in Korean traditional foods. J Fd Hyg Safety 19: 209-216.
  9. Park JH, Wang XY, Lee JS, Kim MH. 2012. Evaluation of dry medium (Sanita-Kun) for enumeration of coliforms and Escherichia coli in milk, ice cream, ham, and codfish fillet. Food Sci Biotechnol 21: 1789-1793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-012-0240-9
  10. 3M. Petrifilm guidebook. http://www.joylab.net/src/board/board_view.php?board_article_id=8&board_category_id=0&board_id=board_faq&board_page=1&seq=5 (accessed July 2011).
  11. Beloti V, Barros MAF, de Freitas JC, Nero LA, de Souza JA, Santana EHW, Franco BDGM. 1999. Frequency of 2,3,5- triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) non-reducing bacteria in pasteurized milk. Rev Microbiol 30: 137-140. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0001-37141999000200009
  12. JNC Corporation. Evaluation and specificity of dry rehydratable film (Sanita-Kun). http://anylab.co.kr (accessed July 2011).
  13. Kwak YS, Chang JK, Lee KS. 1995. Bacterial counts in ginseng products by dry rehydratable film method. J Fd Hyg Safety 10:41-43.
  14. Rosmini MR, Signorini ML, Schneider R, Bonazza JC. 2004. Evaluation of two alternative techniques for counting mesophilic aerobic bacteria in raw milk. Food Control 15: 39-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-7135(03)00005-7
  15. Cho MH, Bae EK, Ha SD, Park YS, Mok CK, Hong KP, Kim SP, Park JY. 2005. Evaluation of dry rehydratable film method for enumeration of microorganisms in meat, dairy and fishery products. Korean J Food Sci Technol 37: 294-300.
  16. KFDA. 2011. Korean food standards codex. Korea Food and Drug Administration, Chungbuk, Korea. Vol. 2, p10-8-23-10-8-24.
  17. 3M. 3MTM PetrifilmTM Aerobic Count Plate. http://www.3m.com/intl/kr/microbiology/petri_01aerobic.htm(accessed July 2012).
  18. JNC Corporation. Instruction manual of Sanita-Kun. http://www.jnc-corp.co.jp/sanita/siryou/itiran_E.htm (accessed July 2012).
  19. Cha JA, Kim YJ, Seo YB, Yoon MH. 2009. Isolation of an agarolytic bacteria, Cellvibrio mixtus SC-22 and the enzymatic properties. J Appl Biol Chem 52: 157-162. https://doi.org/10.3839/jabc.2009.027
  20. Ginn RE, Packard VS, Fox TL. 1984. Evaluation of the 3M dry medium culture plate (Petrifilm-TM SM) method for determining numbers of bacteria in raw milk. J Food Prot 47:753-755. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-47.10.753
  21. Ha SD. 1996. Evaluation of dryfilm method for isolation of microorganisms from foods. Kor J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 24: 178-184.

Cited by

  1. Artisanal Fresco cheese from Sonora: Physicochemical composition, microbial quality, and bacterial characterization by high‐throughput sequencing vol.74, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0307.12751
  2. Bacteriological Characteristics of Contemporary Wood During Soil Deposition in Anoxia Conditions at the Biskupin Archaeological Site (Poland) - Petrifilms™ as an Alternative for Conventional Bac vol.19, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.2021.19.3.07