DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The disparity profile of working conditions by the type of employment according to the economic sectors and occupations

임금근로자의 고용형태별 유해요인 노출 격차의 업종별 직종별 분포 특성

  • Rhee, Kyung-Yong (Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, KOSHA) ;
  • Kim, Ki-Sik (Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, KOSHA) ;
  • Yoon, Young-Shik (Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, KOSHA)
  • 이경용 (한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원) ;
  • 김기식 (한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원) ;
  • 윤영식 (한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원)
  • Received : 2013.04.20
  • Accepted : 2013.06.12
  • Published : 2013.12.31

Abstract

OSHA(Occupational Safety and Health Act) generally regulates employer's business principles in the workplace to maintain safety environment. This act has the fundamental purpose to protect employee's safety and health in the workplace by reducing industrial accidents. Authors tried to investigate the correlation between 'occupational injuries and illnesses' and level of regulation compliance using Survey on Current Status of Occupational Safety & Health data by the various statistical methods, such as generalized regression analysis, logistic regression analysis and poison regression analysis in order to compare the results of those methods. The results have shown that the significant affecting compliance factors were different among those statistical methods. This means that specific interpretation should be considered based on each statistical method. In the future, relevant statistical technique will be developed considering the distribution type of occupational injuries.

Keywords

References

  1. Benach J, Gimeno D, Benavides FG (2002). "Types of employment and health", Dublin, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions
  2. Dooley D, Fielding J, Levi L (1996). "Health and unemployment", Annu Rev Public Health. 17:449-465. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pu.17.050196.002313
  3. Park J (2009). "First Korean Working Conditions Survey: A comparison between South Korea and EU countries", Industrial Health 47:50-54. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.47.50
  4. Quinlan M, Mayhew C, Bohle P (2000). "Contingent work: health and safety perspectives or the global expansion of precarious employ ment, work disorganisation and occupational health: a review of recent research", Paper presented to the EU Research Workshop, Dublin 22-23.
  5. Rodgers G, Rodgers J (1989). "Precarious jobs in labour market regulation: the growth of atypical employment in Western Europe. Brussels", International Institute for Labour Studies Free University

Cited by

  1. 위험은 파견, 용역 직원에게 외주화 되는가?: 간접 고용이 안전, 건강, 만족에 미치는 효과 vol.32, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.14346/jkosos.2017.32.3.90