Abstract
This study set out from the perception that one should develop and activate differentiated programs from those 5 programs of the Health Family Support Center (family counseling program, family education support project, family affinity culture support project, care support project, diversity family support project) on the subjects (n=299) of residents in G metropolitan city by reflecting the levels of family values, communication between family members and family relationship. To achieve the study purposes above, this study devised research questions as follows: Research question 1. What are the levels of local residents for their family values, communication between family members and family relationship? Research question 2. Is there any difference in demanding family support project programs according to the local residents' family values, communication between family members and family relationship? Following are the results of this study: First, the levels were analyzed to be more than the average (on a maximum scale of 5 points) with local residents' family values (M=3.55, S.D.=.664), communication between family members (M=3.65, S.D.=.669), family relationship (M=3.69 S.D=.584) Second, the necessity levels for family values, communication between family members and family relationship of the group below the average as compared with the group over the average was found to be significantly high in family education support project, family affinity culture support project, care support project and diversity family support project except family counseling program. Accordingly, strategic plans for increasing the participation rate for the programs by the Health Family Support Center and activating those programs could be by investigating in advance the levels of family values, communication between family members and family relationship by each program respectively and differentiating the target level for the program by the group, or by giving preference to the group below the average who have high needs of program necessity when making decisions for the participation preference of the programs.
본 연구는 G광역시 지역주민들을 대상(n=299)으로 운영되는 건강가정지원센터의 가족지원관련 5개 프로그램(가족상담프로그램, 가족교육지원사업, 가족친화문화지원사업, 돌봄지원사업, 다양한가족지원사업)이 가족가치관, 가족간 의사소통, 가족관계성 수준을 반영한 차별화된 프로그램 개발과 활성화가 필요하다는 인식에서 출발하였다. 이러한 연구목적을 달성하기 위해 첫째, 지역주민의 가족가치관, 가족간 의사소통, 가족관계성 수준은 어떠한가? 둘째, 지역주민의 가족가치관, 가족간 의사소통, 가족관계성에 따라 가족지원사업 프로그램 요구도에 차이가 있는가?라는 연구문제를 설정하였다. 연구결과 첫째, 지역주민의 가족가치관(M=3.55, S.D.=.664), 가족간 의사소통(M=3.65, S.D.=.669), 가족관계성(M=3.69 S.D=.584) 정도는 모두 평균이상(5점만점)으로 분석되었다. 둘째, 가족의 가치관, 의사소통, 가족관계성 수준이 평균미만집단이 평균이상집단과 비교하여 가족상담프로그램을 제외하고 가족교육지원사업, 가족친화문화지원사업, 돌봄지원사업, 다양한가족지원사업 등에서 필요도가 유의미하게 높게 나타났다. 따라서 건강가정지원센터의 프로그램 참여도를 높이고 활성화시킬 수 있는 방안은 각 프로그램별도 가족의 가치관, 의사소통, 가족관계성 수준을 사전에 파악하여 집단별 프로그램 목표도를 차별화하거나, 프로그램 참여 우선순위를 결정할 때 프로그램 필요도 욕구가 높은 평균미만집단에게 우선권을 주는 방안도 고려해야 할 것이다.