Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration (간호행정학회지)

Korean Academy of Nursing Administration (한국간호행정학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Use and Misuse of Statistical Methods in the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration

간호행정학회지 게재논문의 통계학적 방법 사용과 오류

  • Song, Kijun (Department of Biostatistics, College of Medicine, Yonsei University)
  • 송기준 (연세대학교 의과대학 의학통계학과)
  • Received : 2012.12.17
  • Accepted : 2013.01.09
  • Published : 2013.01.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: To do nursing research effectively requires an understanding of fundamental principles of statistical methods. In this article, some key statistical methods which are commonly used in nursing research are identified and summarized. Methods: Ninety-two original articles from the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration were reviewed. Statistical methods were classified and summarized for usage in research and occurrence of common errors. Results: Among the original articles reviewed, 58 statistical usages contained errors. Most errors were found in linear regression analysis, Pearson correlation analysis, and chi-square test. From the detection of statistical errors in usage, suggestions for appropriate statistical methods were made. Conclusion: In order to improve validity of original articles in the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration, clearly stated statistical usage and close editorial attention to statistical methods are needed. Understanding statistical methods is part of the process that researchers must use to determine both quality and usefulness of the research. Research findings will be used to guide nursing practice and reduce uncertainty in decision making. However, to understand how to interpret research results, it is important to be able to understand basic statistical concepts. Researchers should also choose statistical methods that match their purposes.

Keywords

References

  1. Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis (2nd. ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  2. Altman, D. G. (1998). Statistical reviewing for medical journals. Statistics in Medicine, 17, 2661-2674. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981215)17:23<2661::AID-SIM33>3.0.CO;2-B
  3. Altman, D. G. (2000). Statistics in medical journals: Some recent trends. Statistics in Medicine, 19, 3275-3289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097-0258(20001215)19:23<3275::AID-SIM626>3.0.CO;2-M
  4. Altman, D. G., Goodman, S. N., & Schroter, S. (2002). How statistical expertise is used in medical research. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287, 2817-2820. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1001/jama.287.21.2817
  5. Altman, D. G. (1994). The scandal of poor medical research. British Medical Journal, 308, 283-284. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1136/bmj.308.6924.283
  6. Altman, D. G. (2002). Poor-quality medical research: What can journals do? Journal of the American Medical Association, 287, 2765-2767. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.21.2765
  7. Armitage, P., & Colton, T. (1998). Encyclopedia of biostatistics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  8. Bailar, J. C., & Mosteller, F. (1988). Guidelines for statistical reporting in articles for medical journals: Amplifications and explanations. Annals of Internal Medicine, 108, 266-273. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-108-2-266
  9. Dillon, W. R., & Goldsrein, M. (1984). Multivariate analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  10. Emerson, J. D., & Colditz, G. A. (1983). Statistics in practice. New England Journal of Medicine, 309, 709-713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198309223091206
  11. Fisher, V. B., & Lumley, H. (2004). Biostatistics: A methodology for the health sciences (2nd. ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  12. Forthofer, R. N., Lee, E. S., & Hernandez, M. (2007). Biostatistics: A guide to design, analysis, and discovery. New York: ELSEVIER.
  13. Hair, J. F., & Anderson, R. E. (1995). Multivariate data analysis (4th. ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  14. Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applies logistic regression (2nd. ed.). New York:. John Wiley & Sons.
  15. Lachin, J. M. (2000). Biostatistical methods: The assessment of relative risks. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  16. Landis, J. R., & Koch G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
  17. MacArthur, R. D., & Jackson, G. G. (1984). An evaluation of the use of statistical methodology in the Journal of Infectious Disease. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 149, 349-354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis/149.3.349
  18. Redmond, C. K., & Colton, T. (2001). Biostatistics in clinical research. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  19. Rennie, D. (1998). Freedom and responsibility in medical publication: Setting the balancing right. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 300-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.3.300
  20. Rosner, B. (2011). Fundamentals of biostatistics (7th. ed.). Pacific Grove: Duxbury.
  21. Shoukri, M. M., & Pause, M. M. (1998). Statistical methods for health sciences (2nd. ed.). New York: CRC Press.
  22. Sterne, J. A., & Davey, S. G. (2001). Sifting the evidence: What's wrong with significance tests? British Medical Journal, 322, 226-231. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7280.226

Cited by

  1. Type of Statistical Methods and Errors in the Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing vol.22, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2015.22.4.452
  2. Analysis of Manuscripts Rejected by the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration [2012~2015 Jun] vol.21, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2015.21.5.561