Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society

The Korean Data and Information Science Society (한국데이터정보과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Class homogeneous tests with correlation

상관관계가 존재하는 등급별 동질성 검정방법

  • Received : 2012.11.05
  • Accepted : 2012.12.28
  • Published : 2013.01.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Among class quantitative tests for the credit rating systems, the credit rating tests for calibration are to test the class homogeneous differences between observed and predicted probabilities. For one time period, binomial test and chi-square test are included, and normal test and extended traffic lights test are also contained for several time peroids. In this work, we consider real data in which there exists correlation among variables, so that these test methods could be applied to the credit rating systems as well as various kinds of the class data such as BWT data and FSI data.

신용평가방법에서 등급의 계량화 중 신용등급 변화 검정방법은 등급별로 추정된 예측부도율과 실제부도율과의 동질성을 검정하는 방법으로 한 시점에 대한 이항검정과 카이제곱검정 등이 있고, 여러시점의 정확성을 검증하는 방법으로 정규성검정, 확장된 신호등검정 등이 있다. 본 연구에서는 현실적인 상황을 고려하여 이런 검정방법들이 상관관계가 존재하는 경우에 등급별 동질성 검정방법을 소개하고 이 방법들을 신용평가 이외에 다양한 분야의 자료에 활용할 수 있음을 알아본다.

Keywords

References

  1. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (BCBS) (2005). Studies on the validation of internal rating systems (revised), Working Paper, 14, Bank for International Settlements, Switzerland.
  2. Blochwitz, S., Hohl, S., Tasche, D. and Carsten S. W. (2004). Validating default probabilites on short time series, Working Paper, Deutsche Bundesbank, Germany.
  3. Gagliardini, P. and Gourieroux, C. (2010). Granularity adjustment for risk measures: Systematic vs unsystematic risks, Working Paper, CREST, Loughborough University, United Kingdom.
  4. Gordy, M. B. (2002). A risk factor model foundation for rating based bank capital rules. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 22, 199-232.
  5. Ha, J. (2009). A study on validating the calibration of the internal rating system. Jounal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 11, 827-837.
  6. Kim, E. N. and Ha, J. (2010). Study on the consistency methods of calibration considering correlations. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 21, 407-417.
  7. Lee, S. H. and Sim J. H. (2006). Study for quantitative goodness of fit tests based on new BIS criteria. Risk Review, Summer, 1.
  8. Lim, C. S. (2005). Goodness of fit tests for credit evaluation systen based on new BIS criteria. Risk Review, Summer, 3.
  9. Lim, J. K. (2006). Introduction of goodness of fit tests for credit evaluation systen. Risk Review, Autumn, 1.
  10. Martin, R. and Wilde, T. (2002). Unsystematic credit risk. RISK Magazine, 15, 123-128.
  11. Merton, R. C. (1974). On the pricing of corporate debt: The risk structure of interest rates. Journal of Finance, 29, 449-470.
  12. OeNB. (2005). Rating models and validation, guidelines on credit risk management, Otto Wagner Platz, Austria.
  13. So, S. H. and Lee, D. H. (2009a). Risk model validation for multi-period probability of default estimates. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 11, 839-849.
  14. So, S. H. and Lee, D. H. (2009b). Credit risk model validation with correlated binomial distribution. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 11, 327-338.
  15. Tasche, D. (2003). A traffic lights approach to PD validation, Working Paper, Deutsche Bundesbank, Germany.
  16. Tasche, D. (2005). Calculating credit risk capital charges with the one-factor model. Journal of RISK, 7, 85-101. https://doi.org/10.21314/JOR.2005.110
  17. Vasicek, O. A. (2002). The distribution of loan portfolio value. Journal of RISK, 15, 160-162.

Cited by

  1. Comparisons of the corporate credit rating model power under various conditions vol.26, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2015.26.6.1207
  2. 얼굴마비 환자의 의·한의 협진 의료이용 연구: 건강보험심사평가원 환자표본 데이터를 이용 vol.28, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2017.28.1.75