DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Laboratory Performance Evaluation of Alternative Dowel Bar for Jointed Concrete Pavements

콘크리트 포장용 고내구성 대체 다웰바의 실내공용성 평가

  • 박성태 (한국도로공사 (전)스마트하이웨이사업단) ;
  • 박준영 (한국도로공사 도로교통연구원) ;
  • 이재훈 (한국도로공사 도로교통연구원) ;
  • 김형배 (한국도로공사 도로교통연구원)
  • Received : 2012.05.09
  • Accepted : 2012.10.30
  • Published : 2013.02.15

Abstract

PURPOSES: The problem under this circumstance is that the erosion not only drops strength of the steel dowel bar but also comes with volume expansion of the steel dowel bar which can reduce load transferring efficiency of the steel dowel bar. To avoid this erosion problem, alternative dowers bars are developed. METHODS: In this study, the bearing stresses between the FRP tube dowel bar and concrete slab are calculated and compared with its allowable bearing stress to check its structural stability in the concrete pavement. These comparisons are conducted with several cross-sections of FRP tube dowel bars. Comprehensive laboratory tests including the shear load-deflection test on a full-scale specimen and the full-scale accelerated joint concrete pavement test are conducted and the results were compared with those from the steel dowel bar. RESULTS: In all cross-sections of FRP tube dowel bars, computed bearing stresses between the FRP tube dowel bar and concrete slab are less than their allowable stress levels. The pultrusion FRP-tube dowel bar show better performance on direct shear tests on full-scale specimen and static compression tests at full-scale concrete pavement joints than prepreg and filament-winding FRP-tube dowel bar. CONCLUSIONS: The FRP tube dowel bars as alternative dowel bar are invulnerable to erosion that may be caused by moisture from masonry joint or bottom of the pavement system. Also, the pultrusion FRP-tube dowel bar performed very well on the laboratory evaluation.

Keywords

References

  1. AASHTO, 2010. Standard Method of Test for Coated Dowel Bars, Designation T 253-02.
  2. ACI, 1956. American Concrete Institute's Committee 325.
  3. ASTM, 1996. Apparent Horizontal Shear Strength of Pultruded Reinforced Plastic Roads By the Short-Beam Method, Designation D 4475-96.
  4. ASTM, 1997. Flexural Properties of Fiber Reinforced Pultruded Plastic Rods, Designation D 4476-97.
  5. Davis D., Porter M. L., 1998. Evaluation of Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastic Dowel as Load Transfer Devices in Highway Pavement Slabs, 1998 Transportation Conference Proceedings, pp.78-81.
  6. HITEC, 2005. Evaluation of Alternative Dowel Bar Materials, Highway Innovative Technology Evaluation Center, 45101-005.
  7. Jelka, 1989. Study of the yield point of the thread, International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, Vol. 10 Iss: 3/4, pp.244-251.
  8. Jung, K. S., Kim, I. T., Ryu, S. W., Cho, Y. H., 2008. Development of Stress Equations of Jointed Concrete Pavement using Finite Element Method, International Journal of Highway Engineering, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp.165-179. (정길수, 김인태, 류성우, 조윤호, 2008. 유한 요소법을 이용한 줄눈 콘크리트 포장 응력식 개발, 한국도로학회 논문집, 제10권 2호, pp.165-179)
  9. Konkuk University, 2007. Evaluation of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Dowel Bars for Cement Concrete Pavement, Konkuk University Industrial Cooperation Corp. (건국대학교, 2007. FRP Dowel Bar의 시멘트 콘크리트 포장 적용성 평가, 건국대학교 산학협력단)
  10. KS, 2005. Method of test for compressive strength of concrete, KS F 2405, Korean Agency for Technology and Standards. (KS, 2005. 콘크리트의 압축강도 시험방법, KS F 2405, 지식경제부 기술표준원)
  11. Lim, J. S., Son, S. C., Liu, J. H., Jeong, J. H., 2010. Modeling of Friction Characteristic Between Concrete Pavement Slab and Subbase, International Journal of Highway Engineering, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp.211-218. (임진선, 손석철, 유주호, 정진훈, 2010. 콘크리트 포장 슬래브와 보조기층 간 마찰특성 모형화, 한국도로학회 논문집, 제12권 4호, pp.211-218)
  12. Park, J. Y., Hong, D. S., Lim, D. S., Jeong, J. H., 2011. Development of Mechanistic-empirical Joint Spacing Design Method for Concrete Pavements, International Journal of Highway Engineering, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp.51-59. (박주영, 홍동성, 임진선, 정진훈, 2011. 역학적-경험적 콘크리트 포장 줄눈간격 설계방법 개발, 한국도로학회 논문집, 제13권4호, pp.51-59)
  13. Park, Jun Young, Lee, Jae Hoon, Sohn, Dueck Su, 2011. Structural Analysis of Concrete-filled FRP Tube Dowel Bar for Jointed Concrete Pavements, International Journal of Highway Engineering, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp.21-30. (박준영, 이재훈, 손덕수, 2011. 콘크리트 포장에서 FRP 튜브 다웰바의 역학적 특성 분석, 한국도로학회 논문집, 제13권 3호, pp.21-30)
  14. Porter, M. L., Guinn, R. J., Lundy, A. L., 2001. Dowel Bar Optimization-Phases I and II: Final Report, American Highway Technology Report. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University, Center for Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Technology.
  15. Porter, M. L., Guinn, R. J., 2002. Assessment of Dowel Bar Research, Iowa DOT, HR-1080
  16. Porter, M. L., Cable, J. K., Fanous, F. S., Harrington, J. F., Pierson, N. J., 2006. Laboratory Study of Structural Behavior of Alternative Dowel Bars, FHWA, IHRB Project TR-510.
  17. Scott Murison, EIT, KGS Group, Winnipeg, Manitoba, 2004. Laboratory Evaluation of Concrete-filled GFRP Dowels in Jointed Concrete Pavements, Annual Conference of the Transportation Association of Canada.
  18. Smith, K. D., 2001. High Performance Concrete Pavements : Alternative Dowel Bars for Load Transfer in Jointed Concrete Pavements, FHWA-IF-02-052, Federal Highway Administration.
  19. FHWA, 2007. Long-life Concrete Pavement : Best Practices and Directions from the States, FHWA-HIF-07-030.
  20. Wang, D. Y., Hu, C. C., Richard, R., 2006. Assessment of Grouted Fibre-Reinforced Polymer(GFRP) Tubes As Dowel Bar Alternatives, 25th Southern African Transport Conference.
  21. Yang, Sung Chul, Choi, Jae Gon, 2008. Stiffness Test of Dowel Bar for Joined Concrete Pavement, International Journal of Highway Engineering, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp.81-89. (양성철, 최재곤, 2008. 콘크리트 포장의 다웰바 전단거동 실험, 한국도로학회 논문집, 제10권1호, pp.81-89)
  22. Yang, Jae Guen, 2010. Analytical Models for the Ultimate Plastic Displacement and the Ultimate Load of a Double Angle Connection Under Tension, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp.3-10. (양재근, 2010. 축방향 인장력을 받는 더블앵글 접합부의 한계 상태 소성변위 및 한계하중 해석모델, 대한건축학회논문 집, 제26권2호, pp.3-10)