Journal of Embryo Transfer (한국수정란이식학회지)

The Korean Society of Embryo Transfer (한국수정란이식학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Epidemiological Investigation and Antibiotic Sensitivity of Salmonellosis in Goats at the Selected Areas of Bangladesh

  • Saha, Gobindha Kumar (Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University) ;
  • Paul, Ashit Kumar (Deparment of Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Patuakhali Science and Technology University) ;
  • Abdussamad, Abdussamad (Upazila Livestock Office, Department of Livestock Services, Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock) ;
  • Islam, M. Ariful (Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University) ;
  • Khan, M. Shahidur Rahman (Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University)
  • Received : 2013.10.16
  • Accepted : 2013.12.11
  • Published : 2013.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Salmonellosis is one of the life-threating diseases of goat in Bangladesh. Therefore, the present study was designed to study the prevalence of Salmonellosis, and isolation and characterizations of the Salmonella spp. from apparently healthy and diarrheic goat. A total of 47 faces samples were collected from selected place and cultured onto different prescribed medium to isolate it. In this study, 12.76% (6/47) samples were found to be positive for Salmonella spp. During culture on SS agar medium, all of the Salmonella isolates produced round, smooth, opaque, translucent and black color colonies on SS agar media. All of the isolated Salmonella spp. fermented dextrose, maltose and mannitol with production of acid and gas but did not ferment sucrose and lactose. However, these isolates had showed Indole and Voges-Proskauer test negative, Methyl-Red test positive. All of these isolates were subjected to rapid plate agglutination test with polyvalent "O" (Poly 'O') and polyvalent "H" (poly 'H') antisera where positive agglutination were observed. They were highly sensitive to ciprofloxacin, spiramycin and gentamycin; moderately sensitive to oxytetracyline, streptomycin and amoxicillin; less sensitive to sulphamethoxazole and resistant to penicillin-G. Based on the present findings, it may be concluded that the investigated Salmonella spp. from goats might be S. typhimurium, S. enteritidis, S. brandenburg, S. salford, S. newbrunswick, S. newport or S. dublin. Further study will be needed, therefore it requires further characterization using other serological and molecular techniques.

Keywords

References

  1. Arruda SGB, Biscontini TMB and Stamford TLM. 2004. Microbiological characterization of goat meat subjected to different forms of management. Hygiene Alimentar 18: 58-62.
  2. Avakian AP, Kleven SH and Glisson JR. 1988. Evaluation of the specificity and sensitivity of two commercial enzyme linked immunosorbent assay kits, the serum plate agglutination test and haemagglutination inhibition test for antibodies formed in response to Salmonella spp. Avian Diseases 32: 262-272. https://doi.org/10.2307/1590813
  3. Bauser AW, Kirby WMM, Sheris JC and Truck M. 1966. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disc method. American J. Clin. Pathology 145: 225-230.
  4. Begum F. 1992. Studies on the immune response in chickens with experimentally prepared Salmonella gallinarum vaccine, MS thesis. Department of Microbiology and Hygiene, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, p.88.
  5. Begum F. 2005. A 37.81k Da protein reacting with sera obtained from Salmonella typhimurium infected chicks in Salmonella serovars. Ph.D. thesis. Submitted to the United Graduate School, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo, Japan, p.230.
  6. Blood DC, Henderson AJ, Radosontits AJH and Gay CC. 2003. A Text Book of the Diseases of Animals. 9th ed., pp. 809-829.
  7. Buxton A and Fraser G. 1977. Animal Microbiology. Vol. 1. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, London, Edinburg, Melbourne, pp.85-86.
  8. Cheesbrough M. 1984. Medical Laboratory Manual for Tropical Countries. First edition. Vol. 2. Microbiology, Chapter 35. London English Language Book Society, pp.40-57.
  9. Cheesbrough M. 1985. Medical laboratory manual for tropical countries. Microbiology, Vol. 2. pp.400-480.
  10. Cooke EM and Todd E. 1990. Epidemiology of foodborne illness: UK. Lancet 336: 790-793. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(90)93251-J
  11. Dhruba C, Chakrabory G and Chatterjee A. 1999. Studies on avian Salmonellosis in West Bengal. Indian Journal of Animal Science 69: 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800051043
  12. Freeman BA. 1985. Burrows Textbook of Microbiology. 22nd edn. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, London, Toronto, Mexici City, Rio de Janerio, Sydney, Tokyo. pp. 464-472.
  13. Gene O. 2002. The isolation, identification and serotyping of Salmonella isolated from domestic poulry in Kars district. Kafkas Univarsikesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi, 8: 23-30.
  14. Ghosh SS, Barman AK and Nanda SK 1987. Occurrence of Salmonella virchow 6,7:1:1,2 in chicks from Nagaland. Indian J. Anim. Sci 57: 532-534.
  15. Habrun B, Listes E, Spicic S, Cvetnic Z, Lukacevic D, Jemersic L, Lojkic M and Kompes G. 2006. An outbreak of Salmonella abortusovis abortions in goat in South Croatia. J. Vet. Medical Series 53: 286-290.
  16. Hobbs BS and Roberts D. 1993. Bacterial and other microbial agents of food poisoning and food-borne infection Edward Arnold, London. Food Poisoning and Food Hygiene, pp. 26-50.
  17. Islam MM. 2007. Characterization of Salmonella isolated from apparently healthy and diarrhoeatic calves. M.S. Thesis. Department of Microbiology and Hygiene, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh p.145.
  18. Jones TC, Hunt RD and King NW. 1997. Veterinary Pathology. 6th edn. Williams and Wilkins Co, Baltimore, USA, p.345.
  19. Kobayashi H, Kanazaki M, Shimizu Y, Nakajima H, Khatun MM, Hata E and Kubo, M. 2007. Salmonella isolates from rectal swabs and faeces of animals in the immediate environment of "Tokyo Bay". J. Vet. Medical Sci 69: 309-311. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.69.309
  20. Mahendra M, Vandana J, Joshi DD and Poornima M. 2006. Prevalence of Salmonella species in various raw meat samples of a local market in Kathmandu. Annals of the New- York Aca. Sci., 1081: 249-256. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1373.031
  21. Merchant IA and Packer RA. 1967. Veterinary Bacteriology and Virology, 7thedn. The Iowa University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA, pp.286-306.
  22. Mudit C, Singh BR, Hari S, Meenu A, Agarwal RK, Gautam S and Babu, N. 2007. Prevalence of Salmonella antibodies among goats slaughtered for chevon in Bareilly (Northern India). Preventive Veterinary Medicine 80: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.01.008
  23. Office International Des Epizootics (OIE), 2000. Manual of Standards for Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines, p.37.
  24. Rahman, MS. 2007. Investigation of Salmonella through retrospective case study and the application of antibiogram with Salmonella. M.S. thesis. Department of Microbiology and Hygiene, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, p.120.
  25. Ruiz J, Sempere MA, Varela MC and Gomez J. 1992. Modification of the methodology of stool culture for Salmonella detection. J. Clinical Microbio. 30: 525-526.
  26. Shaffer MF, Bridges JF, Clemmer DI and Pontoppidan KC. 1964. Susceptibility of goats to experimental injection with Salmonella typhosa. J. Hygiene, 80: 377-387.
  27. Tabaraie B, Sharma BK, Sharma PR, Sehgal NR and Ganguly NK. 1994. Evaluation of Salmonella porins as a broad spectrum vaccine candidate. Microbio. Immuno 38: 553-559. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1348-0421.1994.tb01822.x
  28. Yadav MM, Sham T, Rakesh S, Varsha S, Sheela T, Umesh K and Garg. 2006. Bacteriological quality of buffalo meat in Mhow town of India. Inter. J. Food Sci. Techn., 41: 1234-1238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2006.01196.x