DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Socioeconomic Status and Number of Children Among Korean Women: The Healthy Twin Study

  • Kim, Jinseob (Preventive Medicine Program, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University) ;
  • Sung, Joohon (Preventive Medicine Program, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2012.07.02
  • 심사 : 2012.12.28
  • 발행 : 2013.01.31

초록

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate whether the birth rate is associated with socioeconomic status in the women of the Republic of Korea, where the birth rate is rapidly decreasing. Methods: This study included 732 females from the Healthy Twin Study, a family-twin cohort. The participants were classified into 3 socioeconomic groups according to their average income, education, and occupation. The association between socioeconomic status and number of children was assessed using gamma regression analysis with a generalized linear mixed model, adjusting for the age group, smoking/alcohol status, and family relationships. Results: The group with the highest education level had significantly fewer children compared with the group with the lowest education level (p=0.004). However, no significant associations were found according to household income level. The non-manual labor group had significantly fewer children compared with those working as homemakers (p=0.008). Conclusions: This study aimed to explain the causal relationship between socioeconomic status and number of children. Associations between some socioeconomic status and number of children were found in Korea.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Statistics Korea. 2010 Birth statistics (confirm); 2011 [cited 2013 Jan 16]. Available from: http://kosis.kr/abroad/abroad_ 01List.jsp (Korean).
  2. Ahn JY. Long-term demand forecast (2005-2020). Mon Labor Rev 2005;(6):3-23 (Korean).
  3. Becker GS, Duesenberry JS, Okun B. An economic analysis of fertility. In: Universities-National Bureau. Demographic and economic change in developed countries. Cambridge: UMI; 1960, p. 209-240.
  4. Heckman JJ, Willis RJ. Estimation of a stochastic model of reproduction an econometnc approach. In: Terleckyj NE, editor. Household production and consumption. Cambridge: NBER; 1976, p. 99-146.
  5. Becker GS, Lewis HG. Interaction between quantity and quality of children. In: Schultz TW, editor. Economics of the family: marriage, children, and human capital. Cambridge: UMI; 1974, p. 81-90.
  6. Becker G, Tomes N. Child endowments, and the quantity and quality of children. J Polit Econ 1976;84(4):S143-S162. https://doi.org/10.1086/260416
  7. Caudill SB, Mixon FG. Modeling household fertility decisions: estimation and testing of censored regression models for count data. Empir Econ 1995;20(2):183-196. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01205434
  8. Gensler H. Welfare and the family size decision of low-income, two-parent families. Appl Econ Lett 1997;4(10):607-610. https://doi.org/10.1080/758533283
  9. Davis NJ. Childless and single-childed women in early twentieth- century America. J Fam Issues 1982;3(4):431-458. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251382003004002
  10. Park KS, Kim YH. Patterns of Korean women's life course. Korean J Popul Stud 2003;26(2):63-90 (Korean).
  11. Ewer PA, Crimmins-Gardner E. Income in the income and fertility relationship. J Marriage Fam 1978;40(2):291-299. https://doi.org/10.2307/350760
  12. Lee SS. Studies of causes of low fertility and comprehensive measures. Seoul: Presidential Committee on Ageing Society and Population Policy; 2005, p. 135-148 (Korean).
  13. Kwon TH, Kim DS. Understanding of the population. Seoul: Seoul National University Press; 1990, p. 195-199 (Korean).
  14. Sung J, Cho SI, Song YM, Lee K, Choi EY, Ha M, et al. Do we need more twin studies? The Healthy Twin Study, Korea. Int J Epidemiol 2006;35(2):488-490. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyi294
  15. Curtis KM, Savitz DA, Arbuckle TE. Effects of cigarette smoking, caffeine consumption, and alcohol intake on fecundability. Am J Epidemiol 1997;146(1):32-41. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009189
  16. Augood C, Duckitt K, Templeton AA. Smoking and female infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 1998;13(6):1532-1539. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.6.1532
  17. Hakim RB, Gray RH, Zacur H. Alcohol and caffeine consumption and decreased fertility. Fertil Steril 1998;70(4):632-637. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00257-X
  18. Sung J, Cho SI, Lee K, Ha M, Choi EY, Choi JS, et al. Healthy Twin: a twin-family study of Korea: protocols and current status. Twin Res Hum Genet 2006;9(6):844-848. https://doi.org/10.1375/twin.9.6.844
  19. Kim HS. The economic and social implication of count regression models for married women's completed fertility in Korea. Korean J Popul Stud 2007;30(3):107-135 (Korean).
  20. McCulloch CE. Generalized linear mixed models. Ohio: Institute of Mathematical Statistics; 2003, p. 28-33.
  21. Melkersson M, Rooth DO. Modeling female fertility using inflated count data models. J Popul Econ 2000;13(2):189-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001480050133
  22. Li C, Cao W, Yu J, Ke T, Lu G, Yang Y, et al. An instrument for in situ measuring the volume scattering function of water: design, calibration and primary experiments. Sensors (Basel) 2012;12(4):4514-4533. https://doi.org/10.3390/s120404514
  23. Nelder JA, Wedderburn RW. Generalized linear models. J R Stat Soc A 1972;135(3):370-384. https://doi.org/10.2307/2344614
  24. Kim HR. Socioeconomic health inequalities and counter policies in Korea. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2004, p. 49-56 (Korean).

피인용 문헌

  1. Impact of socio-economic status on ovarian reserve markers vol.6, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.121423
  2. Socioeconomic status and fertility intentions among Chinese women with one child vol.19, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3109/14647273.2016.1154988
  3. Intent to have a second child among Chinese women of childbearing age following China’s new universal two-child policy: a cross-sectional study vol.46, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsrh-2018-200197