DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Nontraumatic bifid mandibular condyles in asymptomatic and symptomatic temporomandibular joint subjects

  • Cho, Bong-Hae (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jung, Yun-Hoa (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2012.07.29
  • Accepted : 2012.10.04
  • Published : 2013.03.31

Abstract

Purpose: This study was performed to determine the prevalence of bifid mandibular condyles (BMCs) in asymptomatic and symptomatic temporomandibular joint (TMJ) subjects with no traumatic history, and to assess their impact on clinical and radiographic manifestations of TMJ. Materials and Methods: A total of 3,046 asymptomatic and 4,378 symptomatic patients were included in the study. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were reviewed for bifid condyles. T-tests were used to compare the frequency of BMCs when stratified by symptom, gender, and side. In BMC patients, the clinical features of pain and noise, osseous changes, and parasagittal positioning of the condyles were compared between the normally shaped condyle side and the BMC side using chi-squared tests. Results: Fifteen (0.49%) asymptomatic and 22 (0.50%) symptomatic patients were found to have BMCs. Among the bilateral cases, the number of condyles were 19 (0.31%) and 25 (0.29%), respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients, between female and male patients, or between the right and left sides (p>0.05). Compared with the normally shaped condyle side, the BMC side showed no statistically significant differences in the distribution of pain and noise, parasagittal condylar position, or condylar osseous changes, with the exception of osteophytes. In the symptomatic group, osteophytes were found more frequently on the normally shaped condyle side than the BMC side (p<0.05). Conclusion: BMCs tended to be identified as an incidental finding. The presence of BMC would not lead to any TMJ symptoms or cause osseous changes.

Keywords

References

  1. Hrdlicka A. Lower jaw: double condyles. Am J Phys Anthropol 1941; 28 : 75-89. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330280104
  2. Miloglu O, Yalcin E, Buyukkurt M, Yilmaz A, Harorli A. The frequency of bifid mandibular condyle in a Turkish patient population. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010; 39 : 42-6. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/38196548
  3. Espinosa-Femenia M, Sartorres-Nieto M, Berini-Aytes L, Gay- Escoda C. Bilateral bifid mandibular condyle: Case report and literature review. Cranio 2006; 24 : 137-40. https://doi.org/10.1179/crn.2006.021
  4. Menezes AV, de Moraes Ramos FM, de Vasconcelos-Filho JO, Kurita LM, de Almeida SM, Haiter-Neto F. The prevalence of bifid mandibular condyle detected in a Brazilian population. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37 : 220-3. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/72314113
  5. Sahman H, Sisman Y, Sekerci AE, Tarim-Ertas E, Tokmak T, Tuna IS. Detection of bifid mandibular condyle using computed tomography. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012; 17 : e930-4.
  6. Sahman H, Sekerci AE, Ertas ET, Etoz M, Sisman Y. Prevalence of bifid mandibular condyle in a Turkish population. J Oral Sci 2011; 53 : 433-7. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.53.433
  7. Szentpetery A, Kocsis G, Marcsik A. The problem of the bifid mandibular condyle. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990; 48 : 1254-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(90)90477-J
  8. Gundlach KK, Fuhrmann A, Beckmann-Van der Ven G. The double-headed mandibular condyle. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987; 64 : 249-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(87)90098-3
  9. Quayle AA, Adams JE. Supplemental mandibular condyle. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986; 24 : 349-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-4356(86)90020-3
  10. Cho BH, Jung YH. Osteoarthritic changes and condylar positioning of the temporomandibular joint in Korean children and adolescents. Imaging Sci Dent 2012; 42 : 169-74. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2012.42.3.169
  11. Dennison J, Mahoney P, Herbison P, Dias G. The false and the true bifid condyles. Homo 2008; 59 : 149-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2008.02.001
  12. Shriki J, Lev R, Wong BF, Sundine MJ, Hasso AN. Bifid mandibular condyle: CT and MR imaging appearance in two patients: case report and review of the literature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26 : 1865-8.
  13. Plevnia JR, Smith JA, Stone CG. Bifid mandibular condyle without history of trauma or pain: report of a case. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67 : 1555-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.083
  14. Ramos FM, Filho JO, Manzi FR, Bóscolo FN, Almeida SM. Bifid mandibular condyle: a case report. J Oral Sci 2006; 48 : 35-7. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.48.35
  15. Acikgoz A. Bilateral bifid mandibular condyle: a case report. J Oral Rehabil 2006; 33 : 784-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01595.x
  16. Stefanou EP, Fanourakis IG, Vlastos K, Katerelou J. Bilateral bifid mandibular condyles. Report of four cases. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998; 27 : 186-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600343
  17. Melo SL, Melo DP, Oenning AC, Haiter-Neto F, Almeida SM, Campos PS. Magnetic resonance imaging findings of true bifid mandibular condyle with duplicated mandibular fossa. Clin Anat 2012; 25 : 650-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.21300
  18. Forman GH, Smith NJ. Bifid mandibular condyle. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984; 57 : 371-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(84)90152-X
  19. Balciunas BA. Bifid mandibular condyle. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986; 44 : 324-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(86)90084-4
  20. Yao J, Zhou J, Hu M. Comparative experimental study between longitudinal fracture and transverse fracture of mandibular condyle. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 1999; 34 : 178-80.
  21. Li Z, Djae KA, Li ZB. Post-traumatic bifid condyle: the pathogenesis analysis. Dent Traumatol 2011; 27 : 452-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.2011.01035.x
  22. Antoniades K, Hadjipetrou L, Antoniades V, Paraskevopoulos K. Bilateral bifid mandibular condyle. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004; 97 : 535-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2003.09.003
  23. Loh FC, Yeo JF. Bifid mandibular condyle. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990; 69 : 24-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(90)90263-R
  24. Alpaslan S, Ozbek M, Hersek N, Kanli A, Avcu N, Firat M. Bilateral bifid mandibular condyle. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33 : 274-7. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/64166944
  25. Almasan OC, Hedesiu M, Baciut G, Baciut M, Bran S, Jacobs R. Nontraumatic bilateral bifid condyle and intermittent joint lock: a case report and literature review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 69 : e297-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.03.072
  26. Corchero-Martin G, Gonzalez-Teran T, Garcia-Reija MF, Sanchez- Santolino S, Saiz-Bustillo R. Bifid condyle: case report. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2005; 10 : 277-9.
  27. dos Anjos Pontual ML, Freire JS, Barbosa JM, Fraz-ao MA, dos Anjos Pontual A. Evaluation of bone changes in the temporomandibular joint using cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012; 41 : 24-9. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/17815139
  28. McCormick SU, McCormick SA, Graves RW, Pifer RG. Bilateral bifid mandibular condyles. Report of three cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989; 68 : 555-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(89)90237-5

Cited by

  1. Temporomandibular joint diagnostics using CBCT vol.44, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20140235
  2. Incidence of a Bifid Mandibular Condyle in Dry Mandibles vol.28, pp.8, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000003173
  3. A secondary mandibular condylar articulation and collateral effects on a Late Neolithic mandible from Bois Madame rockshelter in Arbre, Belgium vol.16, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpp.2016.12.003
  4. Negative regulation of endothelin signaling by SIX1 is required for proper maxillary development vol.144, pp.11, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.145144
  5. Treatment of Atypical Bifid Mandibular Condyle Associated with Ankylosis of the Temporomandibular Joint vol.2019, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6372897
  6. Symptomatic Bilateral Bifid Mandibular Condyle and Oligodontia in a Non-syndromic Patient - A Rare Case Report and Review of Literature vol.33, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.18311/jpfa/2019/22328