Journal of The Korean Society of Integrative Medicine (대한통합의학회지)

Korean Society of Integrative Medicine (대한통합의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of the Handwriting Training and the Muscle Strength Training on the Function and Muscle Strength of Non-Dominant Hand

글씨쓰기 훈련과 근력 훈련이 비우세손 기능과 근력에 미치는 영향

  • Kim, Moungjin (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Kyungnam College of Information & Technology) ;
  • You, Youngmin (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Kyungnam College of Information & Technology) ;
  • Lee, Hyangjin (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Kyungnam College of Information & Technology) ;
  • Lee, Hyejin (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Kyungnam College of Information & Technology) ;
  • Jang, Chel (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Kyungnam College of Information & Technology)
  • 김명진 (경남정보대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 유영민 (경남정보대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 이향진 (경남정보대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 이혜진 (경남정보대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 장철 (경남정보대학교 작업치료학과)
  • Received : 2013.06.16
  • Accepted : 2013.06.28
  • Published : 2013.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose : We intend to make the study date for an effect of therapy by comparing the functional level both before and after conducting handwriting training and strength training as a part of treatment to improve muscle strength and function of the patient's non-dominant hand. Method : 8 subjects in writing training group conducted hand writing training 30 minutes at once and three times a week for 4 weeks in total 12 times, and 8 subjects in muscle training group conducted muscle training program of putty and Rolyan ergonomic hand exerciser for 15 minutes respectively in sum up 30 minutes at once and three times a week for 4 weeks in total 12 times. 8 subjects in control group are not applied any training for 4 weeks. Results : It was much more effective in handwriting training than muscle strength training by Grooved pegboard because this study showed the speed decrease from 67.11 to 58.26 seconds in handwriting compared with muscle strength training which showed 5.22 seconds decrease from 67.54 to 62.32(P<.05). It showed about 1.34 muscle strength improvement from 6.60 to 7.94 in handwriting training and 0.92 improvement of muscle strength from 7.04 to 7.96 in muscle strength training by 3-jaw chuck pinch, so handwriting training was more effective(P<.05). It showed 11.58 seconds decrease in handwriting training from 26.62 to 18.01 seconds and 10.93 seconds decrease from 27.43 to 16.50 seconds in muscle strength training, so it was significantly shortened both in handwriting and muscle strength training(P<.05). Conclusion : Dexterity, muscle strength, and handwriting ability of non-dominant hand could improve both the handwriting training and the muscle strength training.

Keywords

References

  1. 공미희(2009). 성인 뇌손상 환자의 쓰기 훈련이 손기능에 미치는 효과. 동신대학교, 석사학위 논문.
  2. 김진호, 한태륜(2002). 재활의학. 서울, 군자출판사.
  3. 오혜원(2007). 한국 정상 성인의 미세 손 조작 능력에 대한 연구. 가야대학교 논문집, 15, 157-177.
  4. 이성희(2010). 글씨쓰기 훈련이 뇌졸중 편마비 환자의 장악력과 집기력에 미치는 영향. 단국대학교, 석사학위 논문.
  5. 이택영, 오재근, 김혜영, 이규성, 김문희(1999). 뇌졸중 환자의 환측 상지 기능이 건측 손의 기민성에 미치는 영향. 대한작업치료학회지, 7(1), 56-67.
  6. 황병용(2004). 만성 뇌졸중 환자의 운동기능과 일상생활동작 수행 능력의 상관관계. 자연과학연구소 논문지, 8(2), 111-118.
  7. Backman C, Mackie H, Harris J(1991). Arthritis hand function test: development of a standardized assess ment tool. Occup Ther J Res, 11, 245 -55. https://doi.org/10.1177/153944929101100405
  8. Baser CA, Ruff RM(1987). Construct validity of the San Diego Neuropsychological test battery. Arch Clin Neuropsychol, 2(1), 13-32. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/2.1.13
  9. Bonney MA(1992). Understanding and assessing handwriting difficulty: Perpectives from the literature. J Aust Occup Ther, 39(3), 7-15.
  10. Bornstein RA(1986). Normative data on intermanual differences on three tests of motor performance. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol, 8(1), 12-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01688638608401293
  11. Faber SD(1991). Assessing neuromotor performance enablers. Occupational Therapy: overcoming human perfor mance deficits. New Jersey, Slack, 52.
  12. Feder K, Majnemer A, Synnes A(2000). Handwriting: current trendsin occupa tional therapy practice. Can J Occup Ther, 67(3), 197-204. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841740006700313
  13. Feys HM, De Weerdt WJ, Selz BE, et al(1998). Effect of a therapeutic inter vention for the hemiplegic upper limb in the acute phase after stroke: a single-blind, randomized, controlled multicenter trial. Stroke, 29(4), 785- 792. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.29.4.785
  14. Firrell JC, Crain GM(1996). Which setting of the dynamometer provides maximal grip strength? J Hand Surg, 21(3), 397-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-5023(96)80351-0
  15. Gallahue DL(1968). The relationship between perceptual and motor abilities. Res Q Am Assoc Health, 39(4), 948-951.
  16. Hopkins HL, Smith HD(1978). Willard and Spackman's occupational therapy. 5th ed, Philadelphia, Lippincott, 564-583.
  17. Hunter JM, Schneider LH, Mackin Ej, et al(1984). Rehabilitation of hand, St. Louis, CV Mosby, 101-132.
  18. Jebsen RH, Taylor N, Trieschmann RB, et al(1969). An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 50(6), 311-319.
  19. Peterson P, Petrick M, Connor H, et al(1989). Grip strength and hand dominance: challenging the 10% rule. Am J Occup Ther, 43(7), 444-447. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.43.7.444
  20. Schneck CM, Henderson A(1990). Descriptive analysis of the develo pmental progression of grip position for pencil and crayon control in nondys functional children. Am J Occup Ther, 44(10), 893-900. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.44.10.893
  21. Trombly CA(1991). Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction. 3rd ed, Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 512-530.
  22. Willams HG(1983). Perceptual and motor development. Englewood Ciffs, Prentice Hall inc.
  23. Woodson AM(1995). Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction. 4th ed, Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins.

Cited by

  1. A study on a vision sensor system for tracking the I-Butt weld joints vol.19, pp.10, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02984264
  2. Development of the Evaluation Tool of School-aged Children’s Handwriting vol.26, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14519/jksot.2018.26.1.08
  3. 손 기능 강화 훈련이 손의 기민성과 장악력에 미치는 영향 vol.4, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.15268/ksim.2016.4.2.077