DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

t10,c12 Conjugated Linoleic Acid Upregulates Hepatic De Novo Lipogenesis and Triglyceride Synthesis via mTOR Pathway Activation

  • Go, Gwang-Woong (Yale Cardiovascular Research Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine) ;
  • Oh, Sangnam (BK 21 Plus Graduate Program, Department of Animal Science and Institute of Rare Earth for Biological Application, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Park, Miri (BK 21 Plus Graduate Program, Department of Animal Science and Institute of Rare Earth for Biological Application, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Gang, Gyoungok (Yale Cardiovascular Research Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine) ;
  • McLean, Danielle (Cardiovascular Research Institute, Department of Medicine, University of Vermont) ;
  • Yang, Han-Sul (Department of Animal Science, Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Song, Min-Ho (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Younghoon (BK 21 Plus Graduate Program, Department of Animal Science and Institute of Rare Earth for Biological Application, Chonbuk National University)
  • Received : 2013.08.08
  • Accepted : 2013.09.06
  • Published : 2013.11.28

Abstract

In mice, supplementation of t10,c12 conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) increases liver mass and hepatic steatosis via increasing uptake of fatty acids released from adipose tissues. However, the effects of t10,c12 CLA on hepatic lipid synthesis and the associated mechanisms are largely unknown. Thus, we tested the hypothesis that gut microbiota-producing t10,c12 CLA would induce de novo lipogenesis and triglyceride (TG) synthesis in HepG2 cells, promoting lipid accumulation. It was found that treatment with t10,c12 CLA ($100{\mu}M$) for 72 h increased neutral lipid accumulation via enhanced incorporation of acetate, palmitate, oleate, and 2-deoxyglucose into TG. Furthermore, treatment with t10,c12 CLA led to increased mRNA expression and protein levels of lipogenic genes including SREBP1, ACC1, FASN, ELOVL6, GPAT1, and DGAT1, presenting potential mechanisms by which CLA may increase lipid deposition. Most strikingly, t10,c12 CLA treatment for 3 h increased phosphorylation of mTOR, S6K, and S6. Taken together, gut microbiota-producing t10,c12 CLA activates hepatic de novo lipogenesis and TG synthesis through activation of the mTOR/SREBP1 pathway, with consequent lipid accumulation in HepG2 cells.

Keywords

Introduction

Conjugated linoleic acids (CLA) are a group of geometric and positional isomers of linoleic acid (C18:2) and characteristically contain conjugated double bonds [27,28]. CLA is synthesized via biohydrogenation and isomerization of linoleic acid by rumen bacteria [21] and delta-9 dehydrogenation of trans-11 vaccenic acid in mammalian tissues [9,26]. The predominant CLA isomer in nature is cis-9,trans-11 CLA (c9,t11 CLA, >80%), and is chiefly found in meat and dairy products, whereas trans-10,cis-12 CLA (t10,c12 CLA) is only present in minor amounts in food.

Numerous studies have demonstrated that the biochemical and physiological properties of CLA include reduction of body fat and modulation of lipid metabolism [2,3,6,13], modulation of immune function [20,32], antioxidative activity [33], and growth romotion [34]. It is well established that CLA has the ability to reduce adipogenesis in adipose tissues both in vitro and in vivo. Indeed, CLA prevented lipid accumulation through reduction of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) in rodent [5] and bovine preadipocytes [31]. Dietary supplementation with 0.5% CLA for 5 weeks resulted in decreased adipose tissue cellularity in Sprague-Drawley rats [1]. Similarly, t10,c12 CLA supplementation was associated with decreased expression of C/EBPa in 3T3-L1 adipocytes [19], followed by attenuation of adipocyte differentiation, proliferation, and lipogenesis in adipose tissue [16].

Interestingly, certain populations of gut microbiota are involved in health-promoting properties via CLA [30], but their role is still debated. Recently, it was reported that CLA-producing bacteria could mediate the metabolism in mice supplemented with both high-fat diet feeding and prebiotic substrates [12]. Specifically, among various CLA isomers associated with the presence of gut microbiota, t10,c12 CLA could be responsible for anti-obesity [25] and anti-colon cancer activities [22].

However, gut microbiota-producing t10,c12 CLA exerts contrary effects on hepatic lipid metabolism, with CLA supplementation promoting increased risk factors for steatosis and enhanced fat mass in the liver of mice [8,14,8,24,36]. Evidence providing a biochemical basis for the effect of CLA isomers on hepatic lipogenesis has recently emerged. Supplementation with CLA led to increased triacylglycerol and lipogenic enzyme mRNA levels in the liver of mice [18]. Hepatic lipogenesis increased rogressively, leading to hepatic steatosis, upon CLA supplementation in mice [14]. Furthermore, feeding mice a diet upplemented with 0.3% t10,c12 CLA for 6 weeks resulted in increased liver mass, while adipose tissue mass decreased arkedly [24]. Hepatic steatosis is induced by multiple factors, including increased fatty acid influx, diminished β-oxidation, impaired ApoB containing particle secretion, and increased lipid synthesis. However, the mechanisms that underlie CLA-induced hepatic do novo lipogenesis and lipid synthesis are largely unknown. The present study was designed to examine the ypothesis that CLA augments hepatic lipid accumulation via activation of de novo lipogenesis and lipid synthesis in human hepatoma HepG2 cells. We demonstrate a novel role for the nutrient sensing mTOR pathway in the stimulatory function of gut microbiota-producing CLA in hepatocytes.

 

Materials and Methods

Materials and Reagents

Antibodies for ACC1 (3662s, 1:1,000 dilution; Cell Signaling), FASN (3189s, 1:1,000 dilution; Cell Signaling), SCD1 (2794s, 1:1,000 dilution; Cell Signaling), ELOVL6 (PA5-13455, 1:500 dilution; Thermo Scientific), DGAT1 (3845-100, 1:500 dilution; Bio Vision), GPAT1 (GTX85034, 1:1,000 dilution; GeneTex), AKTpT308 (4058s, 1:500 dilution; Cell Signaling), AKT (9272s, 1:500 dilution; Cell Signaling), mTOR-pS2448 (2971s, 1:1,000 dilution; Cell Signaling), mTOR (2972s, 1:1,000 dilution; Cell Signaling), S6K-pT389 (9205s, 1:400 dilution; Cell Signaling), S6K (2708s, 1:400 dilution; Cell Signaling), S6-pS240/244 (5364s, 1:1,500 dilution; Cell Signaling), S6 (2217s, 1:1,500 dilution; Cell Signaling), and GAPDH (3683s, 1:1,500 dilution; Cell Signaling) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology. Linoleic acid (free fatty acid dissolved in ethanol, #90150) and t10,c12 CLA (free fatty acid dissolved in ethanol, #90145) were purchased from Cayman Chemical.

Cell Culture

HepG2 cells, a human hepatoma cell line, were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum and 1× penicillin-streptomycin at 37℃ in a humidified O2/CO2 (19:1) atmosphere. For reatment, HepG2 cells were supplemented with the indicated concentrations of t10,c12 CLA dissolved in ethanol, or linoleic acid or the indicated time periods.

Nile Red Staining

HepG2 cells were cultured on collagen-coated glass coverslips and treated with t10,c12 CLA for 72 h. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and washed three times with PBS, followed by staining with 0.1 μg/ml Nile-red (MP Biochemicals) in the dark for 30 min at ambient temperature. Specimens were examined using a Nikon Ti-E Eclipse inverted microscope equipped with Perfect Focus, with excitation and emission filters at 561 nm. Images were acquired using consistent laser output, gain, and offset settings for three independent experiments, and 20 cells were randomly selected and analyzed from each coverslip. Tota fluorescence density was quantified using ImageJ.

Cellular Triglyceride and Cholesterol Ester Analysis

Following a 72 h treatment with linoleic acid (100 μM) or t10,c12 CLA (100 μM), cells were washed with PBS and homogenized in 5% NP-40 in water. Cells were slowly heated to 95℃ for 5 min and then were cooled down to ambient temperature; this was repeated to solubilize triglyceride. After centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 2 min, the supernatant was collected for TG and cholesterol ester (CE) determination using enzymatic kits (Wako). Protein concentrations were measured using the Bio-Rad protein DC assay kit with bovine serum albumin as a standard. The TG and CE contents were normalized to protein concentration.

Incorporation of 14C-Acetate, 14C-Palmitate, 14C-Oleate, and 3H-2- Deoxyglucose into Triglycerides

HepG2 cells were treated with either linoleic acid (100 μM) or t10,c12 CLA (100 μM) for 24 h, followed by insulin stimulation (100 nM) for 4 h. Insulin-stimulated HepG2 cells were incubated with 25.0 nmol of [1,2-14C]-acetate (specific activity = 54.3 mCi/mmol; Perkin Elmer), 12.5 nmol [1-14C]-palmitate (specific activity = 60.0 mCi/mmol; Perkin Elmer), 12.5 nmol [1-14C]-oleate (specific activity = 54.4 mCi/mmol; Perkin Elmer), and 4.0 nmol [1,2-3H]-2-deoxyglucose (specific activity = 50 Ci/mmol; Perkin Elmer) for 2 h at 37℃ in a humidified O2/CO2 (19:1) atmosphere. Cells were washed three times with PBS prior to harvest using Cellstripper (Cellgro). Total cellular lipid was prepared according to the Bligh and Dyer method [4]. The lower phase containing neutral lipids was collected and dried under nitrogen gas. Concentrated neutral lipids were then dissolved in chloroform:methanol (2:1 (v/v)) and lipid fractions were separated by thin layer chromatography (TLC, Silica 60 F254; Merck) with organic mobile solvents, hexane/diethyl ether/acetic acid (70:30:1 (v/v)). Lipid dots were visualized under UV light and subsequently scraped off for radioactivity determination using a Beckman LS6500 scintillation counter.

Quantitative RT-PCR

HepG2 cells were treated with either linoleic acid (100 μM) or t10,c12 CLA (100 μM) for 72 h. Total RNA was isolated using an RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen Sciences) and complementary DNA(cDNA) was synthesized from 5 μg of total RNA primed with random hexamer using Superscripts II reverse transcriptase. Realtime PCR amplification was performed using iQ SYBR Green upermix (Bio-Rad) in an Eppendorf Master cycler RealPlex2 after adjusting the threshold cycle (Ct). Reactions were performed in quadruple with an 18S internal control. Relative mRNA levels were expressed as fold increase compared with the control. Primer sequences were as shown in Table 1.

Immunoblotting

Phosphorylation levels of mTOR pathway proteins were determined by western blotting. HepG2 cells were treated with t10,c12 LA (50 or 100 μM) or insulin (100 nM) for 3 h. After treatment, whole tissue lysates were prepared using cell lysis buffer (Cell Signaling, #9803) supplemented with a protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail. Protein concentration was determined using the Bio-Rad protein assay reagent, and extracted protein was solubilized in Laemmli sample loading buffer. A Bio-Rad mini-gel system was employed to perform SDS-polyacrylamide gel lectrophoresis, and a Bio-Rad electroblot system was used to transfer proteins to a PVDF membrane. Transferred proteins were immunoblotted using target primary antibodies and appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies. Enhanced emiluminescence reagents were applied to develop the blots, which were then quantified using Bio-Rad Image Lab software.

Table 1.SREBP1, sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1; ACC1, acetyl-CoA carboxylase 1; FASN, fatty acid synthase; SCD1, stearoyl CoA desaturase 1; ELOVL6, elongation of very long chain fatty acids protein 6; GPAT1, glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase 1; DGAT1, diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 1.

Statistical Analysis

All data represent the results from independent quadruples. Data are expressed as means ± SEM. Comparisons between two groups were performed using the Student’s t-test. For multiple comparisons, the LSD test in conjunction with ANOVA was arried out. A probability value of P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant for all experiments.

 

Results and Discussion

HepG2 Cells Treated with Gut Microbiota-Producing t10,c12 CLA Exhibit Increased Accumulation of Cellular TG

After digestion and absorption of lipid in the gut, the liver has a major role in maintaining lipid homeostasis. When the supply of glucose exceeds its demand, the excess is converted to fatty acids, which primarily undergo esterification with glycerol to produce TG and consequently function as energy stores. In the present study, to investigate the effect of gut microbiota-oducing t10,c12 CLA on hepatic lipid accumulation, HepG2 cells were treated with linoleic acid (100 μM) or t10,c12 CLA (100 M) for 72 h. Neutral lipid storage was examined by Nile-red staining, and was significantly greater in CLA treated HepG2 cells compared with untreated and linoleic acid-treated cells (Fig. 1A). Accordingly, the cellular content of TG, but not CE, was also considerably higher in CLA-treated HepG2 cells(Figs. 1B and 1C). Likewise, in vivo studies have shown that t10,c12 CLA supplementation in mice resulted in increased lipid deposition, followed by hepatic steatosis [8,11,29]. Our findings are consistent with these previous data and, furthermore, reveal that gut microbiota-producing t10,c12 CLA increases TG accumulation, but not CE, in hepatic cells.

Fig. 1.(A) Neutral lipid content of HepG2 cells by Nile-red staining and its quantification by ImageJ and (B) triglyceride (TG) and (C) cholesterol ester (CE) contents measured by enzymatic assays in HepG2 cells. Means ± SEM of two independent experiments are shown. LA, linoleic acid; CLA, t10,c12 conjugated inoleic acid. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Gut Microbiota-Producing t10,c12 CLA Enhances Lipid Synthesis Through Increased Incorporation of Fatty Acids and Glucose into TG

The causes of hepatic steatosis are multifactorial and include increased fatty acid uptake, impaired fatty acid oxidation and secretion of apoB-containing lipoproteins, and lipid synthesis. In particular, steatotic conditions are associated with increased lipid synthesis; thus, the current study investigated the effects of gut microbiota-producing t10,c12 CLA on lipid synthesis. To this end, HepG2 cells treated with 100 μM linoleic acid or 100 μM CLA were incubated with radioactive substrates including 14C-acetate, 14C-palmitate, 14C-oleate, and 3H-2-deoxyglucose. TG was isolated by TLC and the 14C incorporations were measured using a scintillation counter. Treatment with 100 μM t10,c12 CLA resulted in dramatically increased incorporation of acetate, palmitate, oleate, and 2-deoxyglucose (72%, 43%, 37%, and 80%, respectively) into TG when compared with treatment with linoleic acid (Figs. 2A-2D). These results indicate that the observed increase in cellular lipid content upon gut microbiota-producing t10,c12 CLA treatment may be associated with enhanced TG synthesis in HepG2 cells.

CLA-Induced De Novo Fatty Acid and TG Syntheses inHepG2 Cells Is Associated with Increased mRNA and Protein Levels of Lipogenic Genes

To study the fundamental mechanisms underpinning increased hepatic lipid synthesis, mRNA and protein levels of key lipogenic enzymes and transcription factors were determined after 24 h of t10,c12 CLA treatment (100 μM). The mRNA levels of acetyl-CoA carboxylase 1 (ACC1), fatty acid synthase (FASN), elongation of very long chain fatty acids 6 (ELOVL6), and glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase 1 (GPAT1) were significantly increased in CLA-treated HepG2 cells compared with linoleic acid-treated cells (Fig. 3). Accordingly, protein levels of lipogenic enzymes, including ACC1, FASN, ELOVL6, GPAT1, and diacylglycerol acyltransferase 1 (DGAT1), were significantly increased following CLA treatment. ACC1 is the initial key and ratelimiting enzyme in de novo fatty acid synthesis. Several studies concluded that ACC1 plays a pivotal role in development of hepatic steatosis related to CLA supplementation [18,35]. The second central enzyme in this pathway is FASN, which utilizes cytosolic malonyl- CoA produced by ACC1 for de novo fatty acid synthesis and produces 16-carbon palmitic acid (C16:0). Thus, by increasing the expressions of ACC1 and FASN, t10,c12 CLA accelerates hepatic de novo lipogenesis in HepG2 cells

Fig. 2.Incorporation of (A) 14C-acetate, (B) 14C-palmitate, (C) 14C-oleate, and (D) 3H-2-deoxyglucose into triglyceride (TG) in HepG2 cells. Means ± SEM of three independent experiments are shown. LA, linoleic acid; CLA, t10,c12 conjugated linoleic acid. ***P < 0.001.

Fig. 3.(A) mRNA expression and (B) protein levels of de novo lipogenesis and triglyceride synthesis. Means ± SEM of three independent experiments are shown. LA, linoleic acid; CLA, conjugated linoleic acid. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Newly synthesized palmitic acid is further desaturated by stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (SCD1) and/or elongated by ELOVL6. Palmitic acid and stearic acid (C18:0) can be desaturated to palmitoleic acid (C16:1) and oleic acid (C18:1) by SCD1. Palmitic acid and palmitoleic acid (C16:1n7) are converted to stearic acid (C18:0) and vaccenic acid (C18:1n7) by ELOVL6. It has een previously shown that CLA treatment increases the concentration of palmitic acid and stearic acid [15]. In the current study, we observed increased mRNA and protein expression levels of ELOVL6, but not of SCD1, in response to gut microbiota-producing t10,c12 CLA treatment, supporting that saturated fatty acids are increased by CLA supplementation.

Multiple steps and several enzymes are involved in the formation of TG in the liver, including GPAT1, 1-acylglycerol-3-hosphate acyltransferase (AGPAT), LIPIN, and DGAT1. Our results showed that mRNA and protein levels of GPAT1 and DGAT1 were significantly induced by t10,c12 CLA, which supports higher TG accumulation and TG incorporation of various fatty acids and glucose. SREBP1 is a key regulator of these lipogenic enzymes, and expression levels of this transcription factor were also significantly greater following treatment with 100 μM CLA, compared with linoleic acid treatment, in HepG2 cells. Thus, the increased lipid content and TG incorporation observed upon gut microbiota-producing t10,c12 CLA treatment in HepG2 cells can be explained by augmented expression levels of lipogenic enzymes and their transcriptional regulator SREBP1.

CLA Triggers Nutrient Sensing Pathway of mTOR/S6K/S6 to Activate SREBP1 in HepG2 Cells

Lipid homeostasis is largely influenced by environmental factors, particularly the digestion and absorption of nutrients in the gut. The nutrient sensing kinase mTOR is the core component of the multi-protein complex mTORC1, which regulates lipid homeostasis by phosphorylating several ribosomal proteins, including S6K and S6 [23]. It has recently been reported that mTORC1 directly stimulates REBP1, and thus induces the expression of various lipogenic enzymes [10,17,37-39]. In this current study, strikingly, phosphorylation of mTOR, S6K, and S6 were all significantly greater in gut microbiota-producing t10,c12 CLA-treated HepG2 cells compared with the control (Fig. 4). Chung et al. [7] demonstrated that t10,c12 CLA activated mTOR and its downstream pathway, followed by activation of lipolysis in human adipocytes. The effects of CLA were found to be AKT-independent in our study, highlighting the need for future clarification of the mechanisms of AKTindependent activation of mTOR. In brief, the current findings suggest that t10,c12 CLA stimulates mTOR/S6K/S6 activities, with consequential increased expression of SREBP1 and activation of lipogenic enzymes in HepG2 cells.

Fig. 4.Analysis of the mTOR pathway and its activation by t10,c12 CLA. (A) Western blot analysis of mTOR pathways in HepG2 cells. The ratios of phosphorylated to total proteins as measured by densitometry are shown. Data represent three independent experiments. (B) The schematic of gut microbiota-producing t10,c12 CLA activation of mTOR pathways, SREBP1, de novo lipogenesis, lipid synthesis, and hepatic lipid deposition. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

In summary, we successfully confirmed the hypothesis that CLA increases hepatic steatosis via de novo lipogenesis and TG synthesis through the nutrient sensing pathway. We observed a dramatic increase in hepatic lipid accumulation, cellular TG content, and TG incorporation of fatty acids and glucose in gut microbiota-producing t10,c12 CLA-treated HepG2 cells. Through careful dissection of the lipogenic pathways, we showed enhanced expression of SREBP1, which is a key transcription factor in lipid synthesis pathways. The most notable finding of the present study was that CLA induced the activation of the nutrient sensing mTOR/S6K/S6 pathway in HepG2 cells. Taken together, our study underscores the critical role of gut microbiota-associated CLA in hepatic steatosis on the liver following digestion/absorption in the gut and identifies the mTOR/SREBP1 pathway as a major contributor to this pathology.

References

  1. Azain MJ, Hausman DB, Sisk MB, Flatt WP, Jewell DE. 2000. Dietary conjugated linoleic acid reduces rat adipose tissue cell size rather than cell number. J. Nutr. 130: 1548-1554.
  2. Bissonauth V, Chouinard Y, Marin J, Leblanc N, Richard D, Jacques H. 2006. The effects of t10,c12 CLA isomer compared with c9,t11 CLA isomer on lipid metabolism and body composition in hamsters. J. Nutr. Biochem. 17: 597-603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutbio.2005.10.010
  3. Blankson H, Stakkestad JA, Fagertun H, Thom E, Wadstein J, Gudmundsen O. 2000. Conjugated linoleic acid reduces body fat mass in overweight and obese humans. J. Nutr. 130: 2943-2948.
  4. Bligh EG, Dyer WJ. 1959. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 37: 911-917. https://doi.org/10.1139/o59-099
  5. Brown JM, Boysen MS, Jensen SS, Morrison RF, Storkson J, Lea-Currie R, et al. 2003. Isomer-specific regulation of metabolism and PPARγ signaling by CLA in human preadipocytes. J. Lipid Res. 44: 1287-1300. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.M300001-JLR200
  6. Choi Y, Kim YC, Han YB, Park Y, Pariza MW, Ntambi JM. 2000. The trans-10,cis-12 isomer of conjugated linoleic acid downregulates stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 gene expression in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. J. Nutr. 130: 1920-1924.
  7. Chung S, Brown JM, Sandberg MB, McIntosh M. 2005. Trans-10,cis-12 CLA increases adipocyte lipolysis and alters lipid droplet-associated proteins: role of mTOR and ERK signaling. J. Lipid Res. 46: 885-895. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.M400476-JLR200
  8. Clement L, Poirier H, Niot I, Bocher V, Guerre-Millo M, Krief S, et al. 2002. Dietary trans-10,cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid induces hyperinsulinemia and fatty liver in the mouse. J. Lipid Res. 43: 1400-1409. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.M20008-JLR200
  9. Corl BA, Barbano DM, Bauman DE. 2003. Cis-9,trans-11 CLA derived endogenously from trans-11 18:1 reduces cancer risk in rats. J. Nutr. 133: 2893-2900.
  10. Dalle Pezze P, Sonntag AG, Thien A, Prentzell MT, Gödel M, Fischer S, et al. 2012. A dynamic network model of mTOR signaling reveals TSC-independent mTORC2 regulation. Sci. Signal. 5: 25.
  11. Degrace P, Demizieux L, Gresti J, Chardigny JM, Sébédio JL, Clouet P. 2004. Hepatic steatosis is not due to impaired fatty acid oxidation capacities in C57BL/6J mice fed the conjugated trans-10,cis-12-isomer of linoleic acid. J. Nutr. 134: 861-867.
  12. Druart C, Neyrinck AM, Dewulf EM, De Backer FC, Possemiers S, Van de Wiele T, et al. 2013. Implication of fermentable carbohydrates targeting the gut microbiota on conjugated linoleic acid production in high-fat-fed mice. Br. J. Nutr. 18: 1-14.
  13. Du M, Ahn DU. 2003. Dietary CLA affects lipid metabolism in broiler chicks. Lipids 38: 505-511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11745-003-1091-z
  14. Ferramosca A, Savy V, Conte L, Colombo S, Einerhand AW, Zara V. 2006. Conjugated linoleic acid and hepatic lipogenesis in mouse: role of the mitochondrial citrate carrier. J. Lipid Res. 47: 1994-2003. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.M600138-JLR200
  15. Go G, Wu GY, Silvey DT, Choi S, Li XL, Smith SB. 2012. Lipid metabolism in pigs fed supplemental conjugated linoleic acid and/or dietary arginine. Amino Acids 43: 1713- 1726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-012-1255-5
  16. Gregoire FM, Smas CM, Sul HS. 1998. Understanding adipocyte differentiation. Physiol. Rev. 78: 783-809.
  17. Hagiwara A, Cornu M, Cybulski N, Polak P, Betz C, Trapani F, et al. 2012. Hepatic mTORC2 activates glycolysis and lipogenesis through Akt, glucokinase, and SREBP1c. Cell Metab. 15: 725-738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2012.03.015
  18. Ide T. 2005. Interaction of fish oil and conjugated linoleic acid in affecting hepatic activity of lipogenic enzymes and gene expression in liver and adipose tissue. Diabetes 54: 412-423. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.54.2.412
  19. Kang K, Liu W, Albright KJ, Park Y, Pariza MW. 2003. Trans- 10,cis-12 CLA inhibits differentiation of 3T3-L1 adipocytes and decreases PPAR$\gamma$ expression. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 303: 795-799. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-291X(03)00413-3
  20. Kelley DS, Warren JM, Simon VA, Bartolini G, Mackey BE, Erickson KL. 2002. Similar effects of c9,t11-CLA and t10,c12- CLA on immune cell functions in mice. Lipids 37: 725-728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11745-002-0954-7
  21. Kepler CR, Hirons KP, McNeill JJ, Tove SB. 1966. Intermediates and products of the biohydrogenation of linoleic acid by Butyrinvibrio fibrisolvens. J. Biol. Chem. 241: 1350-1354.
  22. Kim EJ, Holthuizen PE, Park HS, Ha YL, Jung KC, Park JH. 2002. Trans-10,cis-12-conjugated linoleic acid inhibits Caco-2 colon cancer cell growth. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 283: G357-G367.
  23. Laplante M, Sabatini DM. 2009. An emerging role of mTOR in lipid biosynthesis. Curr. Biol. 19: R1046-R1052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.09.058
  24. Li J, Viswanadha S, Loor JJ. 2012. Hepatic metabolic, inflammatory, and stress-related gene expression in growing mice consuming a low dose of trans-10,cis-12-conjugated linoleic acid. J. Lipids 2012: 571281.
  25. Martorell P, Llopis S, Gonzalez N, Montón F, Ortiz P, Genoves S, et al. 2012. Caenorhabditis elegans as a model to study the effectiveness and metabolic targets of dietary supplements used for obesity treatment: the specific case of a conjugated linoleic acid mixture (Tonalin). J. Agric. Food Chem. 60: 11071-11079. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf3031138
  26. Miller A, McGrath E, Stanton C, Devery R. 2003. Vaccenic acid (t11-18 : 1) is converted to c9,t11-CLA in MCF-7 and SW480 cancer cells. Lipids 38: 623-632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11745-003-1107-8
  27. Pariza MW, Ha YL. 1990. Newly recognized anticarcinogenic fatty acids. Basic Life Sci. 52: 167-170.
  28. Pariza MW, Ha YL, Benjamin H, Sword JT, Grüter A, Chin SF, et al. 1991. F ormation a nd a ction of a nticarcinogenic fatty acids. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 289: 269-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2626-5_19
  29. Rasooly R, Kelley DS, Greg J, Mackey BE. 2007. Dietary trans-10,cis-12-conjugated linoleic acid reduces the expression of fatty acid oxidation and drug detoxification enzymes in mouse liver. Br. J. Nutr. 97: 58-66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114507257745
  30. Romero P, Rez GA, Inoue R, Ushida K, Yajima T. 2013. A rapid method of screening lactic acid bacterial strains for conjugated linoleic acid production. Biosci Biotechnol. Biochem. 77: 648-650.
  31. Smith SB, Lunt DK, Chung KY, Choi CB, Tume RK, Zembayashi M. 2006. Adiposity, fatty acid composition, and delta-9 desaturase activity during growth in beef cattle. Anim. Sci. 77: 478-486.
  32. Song HJ, Grant I, Rotondo D, Mohede I, Sattar N, Heys SD, et al. 2005. Effect of CLA supplementation on immune function in young healthy volunteers. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 59: 508-517. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602102
  33. Su ND, Liu XW, Kim MR, Jeong TS, Sok DE. 2003. Protective action of CLA against oxidative inactivation of paraoxonase 1, an antioxidant enzyme. Lipids 38: 615-622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11745-003-1106-9
  34. Szymczyk B, Pisulewski P, Szczurek W, Hanczakowski P. 2000. The effects of feeding conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) on rat growth performance, serum lipoproteins and subsequent lipid composition of selected rat tissues. J. Sci. Food Agric. 80: 1553-1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0010(200008)80:10<1553::AID-JSFA650>3.0.CO;2-Z
  35. Takahashi Y, Kushiro M, Shinohara K, Ide T. 2003. Activity and mRNA levels of enzymes involved in hepatic fatty acid synthesis and oxidation in mice fed conjugated linoleic acid. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1631: 265-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-1981(03)00038-6
  36. Vyas D, Kadegowda AK, Erdman RA. 2012. Dietary conjugated linoleic acid and hepatic steatosis: speciesspecific effects on liver and adipose lipid metabolism and gene expression. J. Nutr. Metab. 2012: 932928.
  37. Yecies JL, Manning BD. 2011. Transcriptional control of cellular metabolism by mTOR signaling. Cancer Res. 71: 2815-2820. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-4158
  38. Yecies JL, Zhang HH, Menon S, Liu S, Yecies D, Lipovsky AI, et al. 2011. Akt stimulates hepatic SREBP1c and lipogenesis through parallel mTORC1-dependent and independent pathways. Cell Metab. 14: 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2011.06.002
  39. Yuan M, Pino E, Wu L, Kacergis M, Soukas AA. 2012. Identification of Akt-independent regulation of hepatic lipogenesis by mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) complex 2. J. Biol. Chem. 287: 29579-29588. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.386854

Cited by

  1. The Role and Influence of Gut Microbiota in Pathogenesis and Management of Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome vol.5, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2014.00047
  2. Conjugated Linoleic Acid: Potential Health Benefits as a Functional Food Ingredient vol.7, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-food-041715-033028
  3. Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) influences muscle metabolism via stimulating mitochondrial biogenesis signaling in adult‐onset inactivity induced obese mice vol.118, pp.9, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.201500220
  4. Conjugated linoleic acid rat pretreatment reduces renal damage in ischemia/reperfusion injury: Unraveling antiapoptotic mechanisms and regulation of phosphorylated mammalian target of rapamycin vol.60, pp.12, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201600112
  5. Gut Microbiota Modulation and Its Relationship with Obesity Using Prebiotic Fibers and Probiotics: A Review vol.8, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00563
  6. Metabolically distinct weight loss by 10,12 CLA and caloric restriction highlight the importance of subcutaneous white adipose tissue for glucose homeostasis in mice vol.12, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172912
  7. Implication of trans -11, trans -13 conjugated linoleic acid in the development of hepatic steatosis vol.13, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192447
  8. Effects of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) on fat accumulation, activity, and proteomics analysis in Caenorhabditis elegans vol.249, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.01.017
  9. Can Gut Microbiota Composition Predict Response to Dietary Treatments? vol.11, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11051134
  10. Proteasome activity and expression of mammalian target of rapamycin signaling factors in skeletal muscle of dairy cows supplemented with conjugated linoleic acids during early lactation vol.103, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-17244