Abstract
This study analysed work types of Chinese bibliographical records based on FRBR model to identify how many useful data there are in bibliographical records and how much difference in usefulness there is according to themes. For the purposes, the study randomly extracted samples of 2,200 Chinese books with 100 cases of 22 kinds from "Chinese Library Classification" through National Library of China's OPAC, targeting Chinese books collected by the National Library of China to analyse the work types of Chinese bibliographical records and their usefulness in application of the FRBR model according to themes and data types. The results are summarized as follows: Firstly, in applying the FRBR model for Chinese bibliographical records, 18.6% was considered as useful works for which simple work was added to complex work. Secondly, although it is a fact that usefulness is higher as bibliographical relations are more complex, only works by famous people collected in 'Marxism-Leninism'(A) and some classics and modern masterpieces collected in 'Literature'(I) have diverse versions of works such as sequels, revision, reproduction, adaptation, and critical books. However, if criticism, review, explanation and bibliographical introduction are included in specific subjects of 'Military'(E), 'Language and Words'(H), 'Literature'(I) and 'Comprehensive Book'(Z), it was clear that their usefulness is relatively high.
이 연구는 FRBR 모형의 저작개념에 의한 중국어 서지레코드의 저작유형을 분석하였으며, 중국국가도서관의 OPAC을 통해 "중국도서관분류법(中國圖書館分類法)" 22개 주류마다 100건씩 총 2,200건의 중국어 서지레코드를 무작위 추출하여 FRBR 모형의 저작유형별로 출현빈도를 조사하였다. 분석결과 중국어 서지레코드에 있어 FRBR 모형을 적용할 경우 유용할 것으로 예상되는 저작은 '단순저작'과 '복잡저작'을 합산한 18.6%로 나타났다. 서지적 관계가 일반적으로 복잡할수록 FRBR 모형의 유용성이 높다는 것이 사실이지만, 한 저작에 후속, 개정, 복제, 각색, 비평서 등과 같은 다양한 저작유형을 갖고 있는 저작은 주로 '마르크스-레닌주의'(A)에 소장된 여러 위인의 저작물과 '문학'(I)에 소장된 일부 고전작품, 현대명작 등에 한정되어 있다. 또한 FRBR 모형의 저작개념을 비평 등으로 확대 적용하려면 '군사'(E), '언어, 문자'(H), '문학'(I)과 '종합적 자료'(Z) 등에 우선적으로 적용하는 것이 보다 효과적인 것으로 나타났다.