The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Guided bone regeneration using demineralized allogenic bone matrix with calcium sulfate: case series

  • Kim, Young-Kyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Ji-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Su-Gwan (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Lim, Seung-Chul (Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Chosun University)
  • Received : 2012.10.31
  • Accepted : 2013.04.23
  • Published : 2013.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. The purpose of this case series was to evaluate the effect of guided bone regeneration using demineralized allogenic bone matrix with calcium sulfate. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Guided bone regeneration using Demineralized Allogenic Bone Matrix with Calcium Sulfate ($AlloMatrix^{TM}$, Wright. USA) was performed at the time of implant placement from February 2010 to April 2010. At the time of the second surgery, clinical evaluation of bone healing and histologic evaluation were performed. The study included 10 patients, and 23 implants were placed. The extent of bony defects around implants was determined by measuring the horizontal and vertical bone defects using a periodontal probe from the mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual sides and calculating the mean and standard deviation of these measurements. Wedge-shaped tissue samples were obtained from 3 patients and histologic examination was performed. RESULTS. In clinical evaluation, it was observed that horizontal bone defects were completely healed with new bones, and in the vertical bone defect area, 15.1% of the original defect area remained. In 3 patients, histological tests were performed, and 16.7-41.7% new bone formation was confirmed. Bone graft materials slowly underwent resorption over time. CONCLUSION. $AlloMatrix^{TM}$ is an allograft material that can be readily manipulated. It does not require the use of barrier membranes, and good bone regeneration can be achieved with time.

Keywords

References

  1. Urist MR, Strates BS. Bone morphogenetic protein. J Dent Res 1971;50:1392-1406. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345710500060601
  2. Han B, Tang B, Nimni ME. Quantitative and sensitive in vitro assay for osteoinductive activity of demineralized bone matrix. J Orthop Res 2003;21:648-654. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-0266(03)00005-6
  3. Schwartz Z, Mellonig JT, Carnes DL Jr, de la Fontaine J, Cochran DL, Dean DD, Boyan BD. Ability of commercial demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft to induce new bone formation. J Periodontol 1996;67:918-926. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1996.67.9.918
  4. Takikawa S, Bauer TW, Kambic H, Togawa D. Comparative evaluation of the osteoinductivity of two formulations of human demineralized bone matrix. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;65:37-42.
  5. Ziran B, Cheung S, Smith W, Westerheide K. Comparative efficacy of 2 different demineralized bone matrix allografts in treating long-bone nonunions in heavy tobacco smokers. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2005;34:329-332.
  6. Traianedes K, Russell JL, Edwards JT, Stubbs HA, Shanahan IR, Knaack D. Donor age and gender effects on osteoinductivity of demineralized bone matrix. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004;70:21-29.
  7. Zhang M, Powers RM Jr, Wolfinbarger L Jr. A quantitative assessment of osteoinductivity of human demineralized bone matrix. J Periodontol 1997;68:1076-1084. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1997.68.11.1076
  8. Kim YK, Kim SG, Lee BG. Bone Graft and Implant. Vol. 1. Bone biology and bone graft material. Seoul, Korea, Daehan Narae Pub Co; 2007. p. 140-142.
  9. Wilkins RM, Kelly CM, Giusti DE. Bioassayed demineralized bone matrix and calcium sulfate: use in bone-grafting procedures. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1999;88:180-185.
  10. Adkisson HD, Strauss-Schoenberger J, Gillis M, Wilkins R, Jackson M, Hruska KA. Rapid quantitative bioassay of osteoinduction. J Orthop Res 2000 18:503-511. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100180326
  11. Cheung S, Westerheide K, Ziran B. Efficacy of contained metaphyseal and periarticular defects treated with two different demineralized bone matrix allografts. Int Orthop 2003; 27:56-59.
  12. Gitelis S, Piasecki P, Turner T, Haggard W, Charters J, Urban R. Use of a calcium sulfate-based bone graft substitute for benign bone lesions. Ortho pedics 2001;24:162-166.
  13. Turner TM, Urban RM, Gitelis S, Kuo KN, Andersson GB. Radiographic and histologic assessment of calcium sulfate in experimental animal models and clinical use as a resorbable bone-graft substitute, a bone-graft expander, and a method for local antibiotic delivery. One institution's experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83A:8-18.
  14. Kelly CM, Wilkins RM, Gitelis S, Hartjen C, Watson JT, Kim PT. The use of a surgical grade calcium sulfate as a bone graft substitute: results of a multicenter trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;382:42-50. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200101000-00008
  15. Carpenter JF, Pikal MJ, Chang BS, Randolph TW. Rational design of stable lyophilized protein formulations: some practical advice. Pharm Res 1997;14:969-975. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012180707283

Cited by

  1. Recent Developments of Functional Scaffolds for Craniomaxillofacial Bone Tissue Engineering Applications vol.2013, pp.1537-744X, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/863157
  2. Bilayered construct for simultaneous regeneration of alveolar bone and periodontal ligament vol.104, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33480
  3. Autogenous fresh demineralized tooth graft prepared at chairside for dental implant vol.37, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-015-0009-1
  4. Characterization and antimicrobial efficacy of Portland cement impregnated with silver nanoparticles vol.9, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.3.217
  5. Calcium sulfate induced versus PMMA-induced membrane in a critical-sized femoral defect in a rat model vol.8, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17430-x
  6. Influence of biodegradable polymer membrane on new bone formation and biodegradation of biphasic bone substitutes: an animal mandibular defect model study vol.42, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-020-00280-5
  7. Integration of Dental Implants in Conjunction with EDTA-Conditioned Dentin Grafts: An Experimental Study vol.9, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/dj9060063
  8. Assessment of α-calcium sulfate hemihydrate/nanocellulose composite bone graft material for bone healing in a rabbit femoral condyle model vol.11, pp.9, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1166/mex.2021.2060