Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine (대한물리의학회지)

The Korean Society of Physical Medicine (대한물리의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Motor Performance and P300 during Serial Task Performance according to the Type of Cue

시열과제 수행 시 신호형태에 따른 운동수행력과 P300 분석

  • Lee, Myoung-Hee (Department of Physical Therapy, Kyungsung University) ;
  • Kim, Myung-Chul (Department of Physical Therapy, Eulji University) ;
  • Park, Ju-Tae (Department of Electronics & Information Engineering, Yeungnam College of Science & Technology)
  • 이명희 (경성대학교 이과대학 물리치료학과) ;
  • 김명철 (을지대학교 물리치료학과) ;
  • 박주태 (영남이공대학교 전자정보계열)
  • Received : 2013.05.04
  • Accepted : 2013.05.23
  • Published : 2013.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE: The study was designed to investigate the effects of visual, auditory, and visuoauditory cues on simple Serial Task Performance in heaithy adults. METHODS: Sixty-three right-handed heaithy adults without history of neurological dysfunction were participated. A modified version of the Serial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) using five blocks of perceptual motor sequences was administered. The blocked paradigm consisted of the five blocks with randomly repeated 8 digit sequences with 5 repetition. Three types of sensory cue were employed: visual cue, auditory cue and visuoauditory cue. All subjects were assigned to press the matched botton as quickly and accurately as possible, when one of 8 stimulations was presented(one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight). The reaction time, accuracy, and P300 latency were measured during serial task performance. The mean reaction time(ms), accuracy(%), and P300 latency(ms) were compared between three types of cue using ANOVA. RESULTS: The reaction time to auditory cue was significantly longer than visual and visuoauditory cues(p<.001). And accuracy to auditory cue was significantly lower than visual and visuoauditory cues(p<.001). All P300 latency(at Fz, Cz, Pz) were significantly longer than to visual and visuoauditory cues(p<.05). CONCLUSION: It is suggested that type of cues influence in choice reaction. These data may helpful in designing not only effective motor learning training programs for healthy persons but also reeducation programs for patients with neurological dysfunction.

Keywords

References

  1. Adler SS, Beckers D, Buck M. PNF in Practice: An Illustrated Guide. Germany. Springer. 2008.
  2. Ahn HJ. Selective Attention of Emotionally Disturbed Children. The Korean Journal of Rehabilitation Psychology. 2000;8(1):239-54.
  3. Akamatsu T, Fukuyama H, Kawamata T. The effects of visual, auditory, and mixed cues on choice reaction in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Sci. 2008;269(1-2):118-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2008.01.002
  4. Anderer P, Saletu B, Semlitsch HV, et al. Non-invasive localization of P300 sources in normal aging and age-associated memory impairment. Neurobiol Aging. 2003;24(3):463-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-4580(02)00058-1
  5. Arias P, Cudeiro J. Effects of rhythmic sensory stimulation (auditory, visual) on gait in Parkinson's disease patients. Exp Brain Res. 2008;186(4):589-601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-1263-y
  6. Bae SS, Choi IS, Kim SS. A Stratege of Treatment Approach in the Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation. Journal of the Korean Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Association. 2004;2(1):49-57.
  7. Chuma T, Faruque Reza M, Ikoma K, et al. Motor learning of hands with auditory cue in patients with Parkinson''s disease. J Neural Transm. 2006;113(2):175-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-005-0314-4
  8. Curran T, Friedman WJ. ERP old/new effects at different retention intervals in recency discrimination tasks. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004;18(2):107-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.09.006
  9. Curran T. Effects of attention and confidence on the hypothesized ERP correlates of recollection and familiarity. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(8):1088-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.12.011
  10. Duncan CC, Mirsky AF, Lovelace CT, et al. Assessment of the attention impairment in absence epilepsy: comparison of visual and auditory P300. Int J Psychophysiol. 2009;73(2):118-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.03.005
  11. Fabiani M, Karis D, Donchin E. Effects of mnemonic strategy manipulation in a Von Restorff paradigm. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990;75(2):22-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(90)90149-E
  12. Goldshtrom Y, Knorr G, Goldshtrom I. Rhythmic exercises in rehabilitation of TBI patients: A case report. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2010;14(4):336-45 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2009.06.002
  13. Hagen GF, Gatherwright JR, Lopez BA et al. P3a from visual stimuli: Task difficulty effects. Int J Psychophysiol. 2006;59(1):8-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.08.003
  14. Han DW, Kim SJ. The Effects of Auditory Contextual Interference on Learning in a Golf swing. Korean Society of Sport Psychology. 2008;19(2):1-15.
  15. Han DW. The Effects of Observation with Visual and Auditory Information of Learning in a Sequential Timing. Korean Society of Sport Psychology. 2008;19(3):221-32.
  16. Han JT. Effects of Auditory Cue AFO on Spatio-temporal Gait Parameters in Hemiplegia. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2011;6(2): 127-33.
  17. Hashimoto K, Higuchi K, Nakayama Y, et al. Ability for basic movement as an early predictor of functioning related to activities of daily living in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21(4):353-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968306297870
  18. Hemayattalab R, Rostami LR. Effects of frequency of feedback on the learning of motor skill in individuals with cerebral palsy. Res Dev Disabil. 2010;31(1):212-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2009.09.002
  19. Holcomb PJ, Coffey SA, Neville HJ. Visual and auditory sentence processing: A developmental analysis using event-related brain potentials. Dev Neuropsychol. 1992;8(2-3):203-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565649209540525
  20. Hsieh S. The lateralized readiness potential and P300 of stimulus-set switching, Int J Psychophysiol. 2006;60(3):284-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.07.011
  21. Jarvilehto T. What is motor learning? Kaivo Thomson, Finland. 2006.
  22. Jiang Y, Norman KE. Effects of visual and auditory cues on gait initiation in people with Parkinson's disease. Clin Rehabil, 2006;20(1):36-45. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215506cr925oa
  23. Johnson R. Event-related potential insights into the neurobiology of memory systems. Handbook of neuropsychology. USA. Elsevier Science Ltd. 1995;135-63.
  24. Kim HD. Effect of auditory cues on gait initiation in patients with parkinson's disease: a preliminary study, Physical Therapy Korea. 2007;14(4):44-9.
  25. Kim JG. The Effects of Brain Wave Self - Regulation Biofeedback Training on Learning in a Golf - Putting Task and EEG Alteration. Korean Society of Sport Psychology. 2001;12(1):1-13.
  26. Kolev V, Falkenstein M, Yordanova J. Motor-response generation as a source of aging-related behavioural slowing in choice-reaction tasks. Neurobiol Aging. 2006;27(11):1719-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.09.027
  27. Kunihara T, Tscholl D, Langer FH. Cognitive brain function after hypothermic circulatory arrest assessed by cognitive P300 evoked potentials. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;32(3):507-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.06.006
  28. Lee DS. Study on the Korean Human Brain Mapping, Seoul University, Ministry of Science and Technology. 2006.
  29. Lee HK. Effects of Forms of KR and Post-KR Intervals on Motor Learning in Children, The Korean Journal of Growth and Development. 2006;14(2):95-103.
  30. Luu P, Tucker DM, Stripling R. Neural mechanisms for learning actions in context. Brain Res. 2007;7(1179): 89-105.
  31. Masters RS, Maxwell JP, Eves FF. Marginally perceptible outcome feedback, motor learning and implicit processes. Conscious Cogn. 2009;18(3):639-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2009.03.004
  32. McDowell K, Kerick SE, Santa Maria DL, et al. Aging, physical activity, and cognitive processing: an examination of P300. Neurobiol Aging. 2003;24(4):597-606. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-4580(02)00131-8
  33. Mousavi SY, Low R, Sweller J. Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. J Educ Psychol. 1995;87:319-34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.2.319
  34. Paller KA, Kutas M. Brain potentials during memory retrieval provide neurophysiological support for the distinction between conscious recollection and priming. J Cogn Neurosci. 1992;4:375-91. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1992.4.4.375
  35. Shelton J, Kumar GP. Comparison between Auditory and Visual Simple Reaction Times. Neurosci Med. 2010;1(1):30-2. https://doi.org/10.4236/nm.2010.11004
  36. Shim JY, Lee DH, Jang JG. The Effects of The Frequency of KR and The Complexity of Task on Motor Learning. Korean Society For The Study Of Physical Education. 2004;9(3):69-79.
  37. Sidaway B, Anderson J, Danielson G, et al. Effects of long-term gait training using visual cues in an individual with Parkinson disease. Phys Ther. 2006;86(2):186-94.
  38. Simmons AL. Effect of Practice Variability and Distribution of Practice on Musicians' Performance of a Procedural Skill. University of Taxas at Austin. USA. 2007.
  39. Tsauo JY, Leu WS, Chen YT, et al. Effects on function and quality of life of postoperative home-based physical therapy for patients with hip fracture. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(10):1953-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2005.04.020
  40. Waehrens EE, Fisher AG. Improving quality of ADL performance after rehabilitation among people with acquired brain injury. Scand J Occup Ther. 2007;14(4):250-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038120601182974
  41. Webster KE, Colrain IM, Davenport PW. P300 from inspiratory occlusion reflects orienting but not startle. Biol Psychol. 2004;66(1):21-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2003.08.002
  42. Yagi Y, Coburn KL, Estes KM, et al. Effects of aerobic exercise and gender on visual and auditory P300, reaction time, and accuracy. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1999;80(5):402-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004210050611