한국보육지원학회지 (Korean Journal of Childcare and Education)

  • 제9권1호
  • /
  • Pages.51-79
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 1738-9496(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2508-4208(eISSN)
한국보육지원학회 (Korean Association of ChildCare & Educatioin)
권호 표지

노동권.부모권 관점에서 본 영국과 스웨덴의 일-가족양립정책

UK and Sweden Work-Family Policy on Work.Care Citizenship

  • 김나연 (서울제일대학원대학교 사회복지전공)
  • 발행 : 2013.02.28
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구는 노동권 부모권 관점의 일-가족양립정책을 통해서 여성이 노동자로서 어떻게 복지국가에 통합되어 가는지를 살펴보기 위함이었다. 일-가족양립정책의 노동권과 부모권이 국가차원에서 어떻게 구성되는지는, 돌봄을 둘러싼 젠더체계를 중심으로 돌봄의 사회화방식(탈가족화 탈상품화 가족화 상품화전략)을 통해서 살펴보았다. 실제로 영국과 스웨덴은 돌봄의 젠더체계를 기본으로 돌봄의 책임주체가 다르게 상정되면서, 돌봄의 사회화도 다른 성격으로 발전하였고, 이것이 여성과 남성의 노동권과 부모권에 주는 함의도 다른 결과를 가져온다는 것을 보여주었다. 특히 그 사회에서 여성을 노동자로 보는가, 혹은 돌봄자(carer)로 보는가는 돌봄의 사회화가 어떻게 발전되는가에 있어 중요한 출발점이었다. 돌봄이 사적문제로 한정되는 영국은 당연히 일과 가족의 양립문제는 개인과 시장이 풀어야 할 문제로 가치가 축소되었다. 스웨덴 사례는 돌봄의 사회적 가치가 합의된 상태에서 탈상품화를 통한 남성의 가족화와 탈가족화를 동반한 여성의 상품화 전략만이 실질적인 노동권과 부모권을 획득하는 수단이 될 수 있음을 보여주고 있다.

This study was done to find out how women acquire their work citizenship through work-family reconciliation policies from the point of view of labour right and care right. This study investigated how labour right and care right, established by work-family reconciliation policies, are organized on a national level through the methods of socialization of the care such as the strategies of familization, de-familization, commodication and decommodication because paid labour and unpaid care work can be concretely embodied by such strategies. Actually in the care systems in the UK and Sweden, gender roles related to the responsibility for care was assumed differently. For that reason, the socialization of the care in these countries have been developed in a different way. And different results have been created from the two different countries in labour rights and care righst of man and women. The matter whether a society regards a woman as a laborer or caregiver especially has been an important starting point for the way in which social sharing of care develops. Work-family reconciliation policies stated in this study are very important factors. We can understand that care is not simply a duty of a man or a woman but an important human desire, which has to be granted to both a man and a woman as one of their own individual rights.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 강희경(2007). 탈상품화 개념에 대한 비판적 검토. 가족과 문화, 19(1), 1-27.
  2. 김영순(2006). 블레어정부 이후 영국 여성 사회권의 권리자격변화-보육지원제도를 통해 본 노동자로서의 사회권을 중심으로. 한국정치학회보, 32(1), 171-192.
  3. 김영란(2002). 성인지적 관점에서 본 사회권의 재정립에 관한 연구. 경제와 사회, 54, 187-208.
  4. 김혜금(2010). 보육시설의 질에 대한 어머니와 보육시설장의 인식 비교, 한국보육지원학지, 6(2), 135-154.
  5. 김혜원 외(2007). OECD 주요국의 여성고용정책연구: 영국.캐나다.스웨덴.덴마크. 한국노동연구원.
  6. 류연규(2005). 복지국가의 탈가족화와 출산율의 관계에 대한 비교 연구. 서울대 박사학위논문
  7. 윤홍식(2006). OECD 21개국의 부모권과 노동권 보장수준을 통해 본 가족정책의 비교연구: 부모휴가와 아동보육시설 관련정책을 중심으로, 한국사회복지학, 58(3), 341-370.
  8. 윤홍식(2007). 노르딕 4개국 가족정책의 보편성과 상이성: 아동보육과 돌봄관련 휴가정책을중심으로. 한국사회복지학, 59(2), 327-354.
  9. Baker, M., & D. Tippin.(1999). Poverty, social assistance, and the employability of mothers. restructuring welfare states. Toronto, University of Toronto Press.
  10. Bergqvis, C., & Nyberg, A.(2002). Welfare state restructuring and child care in Sweden. InS. Michel and R. Mahon(ed.), Child care policy at the crossroads: Gender and welfare restructuring, Routledge. pp. 288-307.
  11. Boje T, P, & Leira, A.(2000). Gender, welfare state and the market. Routledge.
  12. Crompton, R.(2001). Gender restructuring, employment and caring. Oxford University Press.
  13. Daguerre, A., & Taylor-Gooby, P.(2003). Adaptation to labour market change in France and the UK: Convergence or parallel tracks? Social Policy and Administration, 37(6), 625-638. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9515.00362
  14. Daly, M.(1994). Comparing welfare state: Towards a gender friendly Approach, In D. Sainsbury, Gendering welfare state, London: Sage.
  15. Ellingsaeter, A., & Leira, A.(2006). Politicising parenthood in Scandinavia-gender relation in welfare state. Policy Press.
  16. Esping-Andersen, G.(1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  17. Esping-Andersen, G.(1999). Social foundatation of post-industrial economies. Oxford: University Press.
  18. Esping-Andersen, G.(2002). Towards the good society, once again? In G. Esping-Andersen, D. Gallie, A. Hemerijck and J. Myles(ed.), Why we need a new welfare state, Oxford University Press.
  19. Finch. N.(2003). Welfare policy and employment in the context of family change. Third reportfor the project, Family Policy in the UK.
  20. Fraser, N.(2000). After the family wage: A postindustrial thought experience. In B. Hobson (ed.), Gender and ctizenship in transition, Oxford University Press.
  21. Gauthier, A.(1996). The state and the family: A comparative analysis of family policies in Industrialized countries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  22. Gornick, Janet C.(1999). Gender equality in the labour market: Women's employment and earnings. Luxemburg Income Study Working Paper no.206
  23. Gornick . J., & Meyers, M.(2003). Families that work policies for reconciling parenthood and employment. Russell Sage Foundation.
  24. Korpi, Walter.(2000). Faces of inequality: Gender, class, and patterns of inequalities in different types of welfare states, Social Politics, 7, 127-191. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/7.2.127
  25. Leira, A.(2002). Working parents and the welfare state-family change and policy reform in Scandinavia. Cambridge University Press.
  26. Lewis, J., & I. Ostner.(1991). Gender and the evolution of european social polices, center for european Studies. Harvard University.
  27. Lewis, J.(1992). Gender and the development of welfare regime? Journal of European Social Policy, 2(3), 159-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/095892879200200301
  28. Lewis, J.(2003). Developing early years childcare in England, 1997-2002: The choices for (working) mothers, Social Policy and Administration, 37(3), 219-238. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9515.00335
  29. Lewis, J.(2006). Employment and care: the policy problem, gender equality and the issue of choice, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis. 8(2), 103-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876980600682014
  30. Lister, R.(2002.) The responsible citizen: creating a new welfare contract Western welfare in decline: Globalization and women's poverty. University of Pennsylvania Press.
  31. Mahon, R.(2002). Gender and welfare state restructuring: Through the lens of child care. In Michel, S. & R. Mahon (eds.), Child care policy at the crossroads: Gender and welfare state restructuring, Routledge. pp. 1-27.
  32. Morgan, Kimbery. J.(2006). Working mothers and the welfare state: Religion and the politics of work-family policies in Western Europe and the United States. Stanford University Press.
  33. OECD. (2005). Babies and bosses: Reconciling work and family life, 4, 89-127.
  34. OECD. (2001). Social expenditure database.
  35. OECD. (2012). Family database.
  36. Olsen, G. M.(2002). The politics of the welfare state; Canada, Sweden and the US. Oxford University Press.
  37. Pascall, G.(1997). Women and the family in the British welfare state: The Thatcher/Major legacy, Social Policy & Administration, 3(3), 290-305.
  38. Perrons, D.(2004). Equity and representation in the new economy. In J. Kelly and P. Willman(ed.), Union Organization and Activity Leverhulme, Roultledge. pp. 51-72.
  39. Pfau-Effinger, B.(1998). Change of family policies in the socio-cultural context of european societies, Comparative Social Research, 18, 135-159.
  40. Pfau-Effinger, B.(1999). The modernization of family and motherhood in Western Europe. In R. Crompton(ed), Restructuring gender relations and employment: The decline of the male breadwinner , Oxford University Press. pp. 60-79.
  41. Ruggies, R.(1984). The state and working women: A comparative study of Britain and Sweden. Princeton University Press.
  42. Sainsbury, D.(1994). Gendering welfare state. London: Polity.
  43. Sainsbury, D.(1996). Gender, equality and welfare state. Cambridge University Press.
  44. Sainsbury, D.(1999). Gender, policy regimes, and policies, In Sainsbury(ed.), Gender and welfare state regimes, Oxford University.
  45. Simm, B.(2000). Gender and citizenship politics and agency in France, Britain and Denmark. Cambridge University Press.
  46. Statistics Sweden.(2004). Statistical yearbook of Sweden. Stockholm.
  47. Stratigaki. M.(2004). The cooptation of gender concepts in EU policies: The case of reconciliation of work and family, Social Politics, 11, 30-56. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxh025
  48. Taylor-Gooby. & Larsen.(2004). The UK- a test case for the liberal welfare state?. In New risk, new welfare, Oxford University Press.
  49. Williams. F.(2004). Rethinking families. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.
  50. Williams. F.(2005). New labour's family policy', In M. Powell, L. Bauld & K. Clarke(ed.), Social Policy Review, 17, 289-302.
  51. Wincott, d.(2006). Paradoxes of new labour social policy: Toward universal child care in Europe's most liberal welfare regime? Social Politics, 30, 286-312.
  52. Woods, D. R.(2006). Focusing on care: Family policy and problems of analysis. Working paper, 30. 5-34.